Message ID | 20241108154258.21411-1-przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | iio: magnetometer: fix if () scoped_guard() formatting | expand |
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:41:27 +0100 Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> wrote: > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > > Add mising braces after an if condition that contains scoped_guard(). > > This style is both preferred and necessary here, to fix warning after > scoped_guard() change in commit fcc22ac5baf0 ("cleanup: Adjust > scoped_guard() macros to avoid potential warning") to have if-else inside > of the macro. Current (no braces) use in af8133j_set_scale() yields > the following warnings: > af8133j.c:315:12: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' [-Wdangling-else] > af8133j.c:316:3: warning: add explicit braces to avoid dangling else [-Wdangling-else] > > Fixes: fcc22ac5baf0 ("cleanup: Adjust scoped_guard() macros to avoid potential warning") > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409270848.tTpyEAR7-lkp@intel.com/ > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Signed-off-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > --- > I have forgot to add this patch prior to the cited Fixes: commit, > so Stephen Rothwell had to reinvent it, in order to fix linux-next. > original posting by Stephen Rothwell: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241028165336.7b46ce25@canb.auug.org.au/ > --- > drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c > index d81d89af6283..acd291f3e792 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c > @@ -312,10 +312,11 @@ static int af8133j_set_scale(struct af8133j_data *data, > * When suspended, just store the new range to data->range to be > * applied later during power up. > */ > - if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) > + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) { I thought I replied to say don't do it this way. Ah well probably went astray as I was having some email issues yesterday. guard(mutex)(&data->mutex); ret = regmap_write... > scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mutex) > ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, > AF8133J_REG_RANGE, range); > + } > > pm_runtime_enable(dev); >
diff --git a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c index d81d89af6283..acd291f3e792 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c +++ b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c @@ -312,10 +312,11 @@ static int af8133j_set_scale(struct af8133j_data *data, * When suspended, just store the new range to data->range to be * applied later during power up. */ - if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) { scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mutex) ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, AF8133J_REG_RANGE, range); + } pm_runtime_enable(dev);