Message ID | 6250192.e2TqKytQZN@kreacher (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: New helper for warning messages and replacing ACPI_EXCEPTION() | expand |
On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:42:29 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Use acpi_evaluation_failure_warn() introduced previously instead of > the ACPICA-specific ACPI_EXCEPTION() macro to log warning messages > regarding ACPI object evaluation failures and drop the > ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition only used by the ACPICA message > printing macro. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c > @@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ > #define ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME "acpi-als" > #define ACPI_ALS_NOTIFY_ILLUMINANCE 0x80 > > -ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi-als"); > - > /* > * So far, there's only one channel in here, but the specification for > * ACPI0008 says there can be more to what the block can report. Like > @@ -91,7 +89,7 @@ static int acpi_als_read_value(struct ac > &temp_val); > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Error reading ALS %s", prop)); > + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(als->device->handle, prop, status); > return -EIO; > } > > > >
Index: linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c @@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ #define ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME "acpi-als" #define ACPI_ALS_NOTIFY_ILLUMINANCE 0x80 -ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi-als"); - /* * So far, there's only one channel in here, but the specification for * ACPI0008 says there can be more to what the block can report. Like @@ -91,7 +89,7 @@ static int acpi_als_read_value(struct ac &temp_val); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Error reading ALS %s", prop)); + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(als->device->handle, prop, status); return -EIO; }