Message ID | 20210622001503.47541-1-ecstaticmorse@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | HID: amd_sfh: Minor DMA mapping bugfixes | expand |
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Dylan MacKenzie wrote: > While preparing to investigate > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212615, I read through the amd_sfh > driver and saw two (unrelated) bugs in the logic that sets the DMA mask. > Ultimately these are harmless, but they should probably get fixed. > > FYI, this is my first time submitting a kernel patch. If I've done something > wrong in formatting this email, it is likely due to incompetence rather than > malice. > > Dylan MacKenzie (2): > HID: amd_sfh: Set correct DMA mask > HID: amd_sfh: Continue if fallback DMA mask is accepted > > drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Nehal, Sandeep, could you please provide your Ack to this series? Thanks,
[ dropping Sandeep, CCing Basavaraj ] On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Dylan MacKenzie wrote: > > > While preparing to investigate > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212615, I read through the amd_sfh > > driver and saw two (unrelated) bugs in the logic that sets the DMA mask. > > Ultimately these are harmless, but they should probably get fixed. > > > > FYI, this is my first time submitting a kernel patch. If I've done something > > wrong in formatting this email, it is likely due to incompetence rather than > > malice. > > > > Dylan MacKenzie (2): > > HID: amd_sfh: Set correct DMA mask > > HID: amd_sfh: Continue if fallback DMA mask is accepted > > > > drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Nehal, Sandeep, could you please provide your Ack to this series? Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > >
On 7/28/2021 3:03 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > [CAUTION: External Email] > > [ dropping Sandeep, CCing Basavaraj ] > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Dylan MacKenzie wrote: >> >>> While preparing to investigate >>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D212615&data=04%7C01%7Cbasavaraj.natikar%40amd.com%7C2dff45d8dc964dbc5b1c08d951aab806%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637630615935776199%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hGpNFpr6BjVg8dvfUTNF8Td1SOdtN5T8c2WACGAZWUo%3D&reserved=0, I read through the amd_sfh >>> driver and saw two (unrelated) bugs in the logic that sets the DMA mask. >>> Ultimately these are harmless, but they should probably get fixed. >>> >>> FYI, this is my first time submitting a kernel patch. If I've done something >>> wrong in formatting this email, it is likely due to incompetence rather than >>> malice. >>> >>> Dylan MacKenzie (2): >>> HID: amd_sfh: Set correct DMA mask >>> HID: amd_sfh: Continue if fallback DMA mask is accepted >>> >>> drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 8 ++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> Nehal, Sandeep, could you please provide your Ack to this series? Thanks, I think, you can merge both of them together as it addresses a single problem. can you please respin a v2 with the changes something like this? privdata->mmio = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[2]; pci_set_master(pdev); - rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); + + rc = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); if (rc) { - rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); - return rc; + rc = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); + if (rc) { + pci_err(pdev, "Failed to set DMA mask"); + return rc; } } Thanks, Basavaraj