Message ID | 1438042086-9827-1-git-send-email-aduggan@synaptics.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Jiri Kosina |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote: > On at least one platform the kernel prints a warning on resume saying > "Unbalanced IRQ 37 wake disable". This is because enable_irq_wake in the > suspend function is failing. This patch checks to see if the call to > enable_irq_wake succeeded before calling disable_irq_wake. While this looks okay, I'm wondering if this can also be fixed from the irq chip side by setting IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to .flags, given that the driver does not provide such function? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 07/28/2015 04:33 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote: >> On at least one platform the kernel prints a warning on resume saying >> "Unbalanced IRQ 37 wake disable". This is because enable_irq_wake in the >> suspend function is failing. This patch checks to see if the call to >> enable_irq_wake succeeded before calling disable_irq_wake. > While this looks okay, I'm wondering if this can also be fixed from the > irq chip side by setting IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to .flags, given that the > driver does not provide such function? Yes, setting IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE does fix the problem. After looking into it a bit more it turns out commit 5613570 already fixed the issue. My test system was running an older kernel which didn't include it. Applying 5613570 fixed this particular issue. Thanks for pointing that out, now I have a better understanding of why enable_irq_wake was failing in this instance. For this patch, I think it is still a good idea to check the return code of enable_irq_wake. In theory, an irqchip which does have a irq_set_wake callback set could return an error. I can update the commit comment, add a warning, and submit a v2. Thanks, Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c index 9ed69b5..1605fbe 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ struct i2c_hid { int irq; struct i2c_hid_platform_data pdata; + + bool irq_wake_enabled; }; static int __i2c_hid_command(struct i2c_client *client, @@ -1096,8 +1098,8 @@ static int i2c_hid_suspend(struct device *dev) ret = hid->driver->suspend(hid, PMSG_SUSPEND); disable_irq(ihid->irq); - if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) - enable_irq_wake(ihid->irq); + if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev) && !enable_irq_wake(ihid->irq)) + ihid->irq_wake_enabled = true; /* Save some power */ i2c_hid_set_power(client, I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP); @@ -1117,8 +1119,10 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev) if (ret) return ret; - if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) + if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev) && ihid->irq_wake_enabled) { disable_irq_wake(ihid->irq); + ihid->irq_wake_enabled = false; + } if (hid->driver && hid->driver->reset_resume) { ret = hid->driver->reset_resume(hid);
On at least one platform the kernel prints a warning on resume saying "Unbalanced IRQ 37 wake disable". This is because enable_irq_wake in the suspend function is failing. This patch checks to see if the call to enable_irq_wake succeeded before calling disable_irq_wake. Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com> --- This patch based on Jiri's for-4.3/i2c-hid and needs Gabriele Mazzotta's patch which moves where the HID driver's suspend callback call to apply cleanly. drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)