diff mbox

input: edt-ft5x06: fixed a macro coding style issue

Message ID 20141209063456.GA15121@ubuntu (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Asaf Vertz Dec. 9, 2014, 6:34 a.m. UTC
Fixed a coding style error, macros with complex values should be
enclosed in parentheses.

Signed-off-by: Asaf Vertz <asaf.vertz@tandemg.com>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Joe Perches Dec. 9, 2014, 6:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 08:34 +0200, Asaf Vertz wrote:
> Fixed a coding style error, macros with complex values should be
> enclosed in parentheses.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
[]
> @@ -849,10 +849,11 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
> +#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) { \
>  	if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&		\
>  	    pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)		\
> -		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name)
> +		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);	\
> +}

Any time you see a naked if (foo) bar in a macro
prefer to use a do while (0) like;

#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg)					\
do {									\
	if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&		\
	    pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)		\
		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);	\
while (0)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Asaf Vertz Dec. 9, 2014, 7:51 a.m. UTC | #2
On 12/09/2014 08:44 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 08:34 +0200, Asaf Vertz wrote:
>> Fixed a coding style error, macros with complex values should be
>> enclosed in parentheses.
>>  
>> -#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
>> +#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) { \
>>  	if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&		\
>>  	    pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)		\
>> -		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name)
>> +		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);	\
>> +}
> 
> Any time you see a naked if (foo) bar in a macro
> prefer to use a do while (0) like;
> 
> #define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg)					\
> do {									\
> 	if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&		\
> 	    pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)		\
> 		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);	\
> while (0)
> 

thanks for the input, I will update and resend it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
index ee3434f..6db9253 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
@@ -849,10 +849,11 @@  static int edt_ft5x06_ts_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
+#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) { \
 	if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&		\
 	    pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)		\
-		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name)
+		edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);	\
+}
 
 #define EDT_GET_PROP(name, reg) {				\
 	u32 val;						\