diff mbox

hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores

Message ID 20161003094503.GC9131@amd (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Pavel Machek Oct. 3, 2016, 9:45 a.m. UTC
On Mon 2016-10-03 10:16:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> u8 (and friends) can be used directly in kernel sources (not kernel
> headers).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Zero day bot warned me that this is not quiet correct.

This would be needed on top. Is there interest in fixed patch?

Comments

Benjamin Tissoires Oct. 7, 2016, 4:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Oct 03 2016 or thereabouts, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-10-03 10:16:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > u8 (and friends) can be used directly in kernel sources (not kernel
> > headers).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> 
> Zero day bot warned me that this is not quiet correct.
> 
> This would be needed on top. Is there interest in fixed patch?

Having both __ and not __ in the same driver would be a little bit
weird. So I'd say we just continue with the existing code. Thanks for
the submission BTW!

Cheers,
Benjamin

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
> index cd208ca..be659ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ union delcom_packet {
>  		u8 cmd;
>  	} rx;
>  	struct {
> -		le16 family_code;
> -		le16 security_code;
> +		__le16 family_code;
> +		__le16 security_code;
>  		u8 fw_version;
>  	} fw;
>  };
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Heiner Kallweit Oct. 7, 2016, 6:46 p.m. UTC | #2
Am 07.10.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:
> On Oct 03 2016 or thereabouts, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Mon 2016-10-03 10:16:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>
>>> u8 (and friends) can be used directly in kernel sources (not kernel
>>> headers).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
>>
>> Zero day bot warned me that this is not quiet correct.
>>
>> This would be needed on top. Is there interest in fixed patch?
> 
> Having both __ and not __ in the same driver would be a little bit
> weird. So I'd say we just continue with the existing code. Thanks for
> the submission BTW!
> 
Reason for me to choose the __ types here was that hid_hw_raw_request
defines the buffer argument as "__u8 *buf" and I wanted to be in line
with that.

> Cheers,
> Benjamin
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> index cd208ca..be659ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ union delcom_packet {
>>  		u8 cmd;
>>  	} rx;
>>  	struct {
>> -		le16 family_code;
>> -		le16 security_code;
>> +		__le16 family_code;
>> +		__le16 security_code;
>>  		u8 fw_version;
>>  	} fw;
>>  };
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
index cd208ca..be659ca 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@  union delcom_packet {
 		u8 cmd;
 	} rx;
 	struct {
-		le16 family_code;
-		le16 security_code;
+		__le16 family_code;
+		__le16 security_code;
 		u8 fw_version;
 	} fw;
 };