diff mbox series

Input: goodix - Fix missing IRQF_ONESHOT as only threaded handler

Message ID 20210416031747.28504-1-zhuguangqing83@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Input: goodix - Fix missing IRQF_ONESHOT as only threaded handler | expand

Commit Message

guangqing zhu April 16, 2021, 3:17 a.m. UTC
From: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>

Coccinelle noticed:
drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c:497:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no
primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT

Signed-off-by: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski April 16, 2021, 8:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 05:18, <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
>
> Coccinelle noticed:
> drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c:497:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no
> primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Did you test it? There are several patches like this all over the tree
so it looks like "let's fix everything from Coccinelle" because you
ignored at least in some of the cases that the handler is not the
default primary one. I am not saying that the change is bad, but
rather it looks automated and needs more consideration.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Dmitry Torokhov April 25, 2021, 5:30 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:47:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 05:18, <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
> >
> > Coccinelle noticed:
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c:497:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no
> > primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Did you test it? There are several patches like this all over the tree
> so it looks like "let's fix everything from Coccinelle" because you
> ignored at least in some of the cases that the handler is not the
> default primary one. I am not saying that the change is bad, but
> rather it looks automated and needs more consideration.

At least the subject is bad because IRQF_ONESHOT is not missing, it is
simply set up elsewhere, the patch itself is a noop. I do not see a
reason to take this.

Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
index c682b028f0a2..725d01e01328 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
@@ -496,7 +496,8 @@  static int goodix_request_irq(struct goodix_ts_data *ts)
 {
 	return devm_request_threaded_irq(&ts->client->dev, ts->client->irq,
 					 NULL, goodix_ts_irq_handler,
-					 ts->irq_flags, ts->client->name, ts);
+					 ts->irq_flags | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					 ts->client->name, ts);
 }
 
 static int goodix_check_cfg_8(struct goodix_ts_data *ts, const u8 *cfg, int len)
@@ -1158,7 +1159,7 @@  static int goodix_configure_dev(struct goodix_ts_data *ts)
 		return error;
 	}
 
-	ts->irq_flags = goodix_irq_flags[ts->int_trigger_type] | IRQF_ONESHOT;
+	ts->irq_flags = goodix_irq_flags[ts->int_trigger_type];
 	error = goodix_request_irq(ts);
 	if (error) {
 		dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "request IRQ failed: %d\n", error);