diff mbox series

[1/1] mm: change inlined allocation helpers to account at the call site

Message ID 20240404165404.3805498-1-surenb@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/1] mm: change inlined allocation helpers to account at the call site | expand

Commit Message

Suren Baghdasaryan April 4, 2024, 4:54 p.m. UTC
Inlined functions which perform allocations are directly charged for
the allocations they perform. In most cases these functions are just
specialized allocation wrappers used from multiple places to allocate
objects of a specific type. It would be more useful to do the accounting
at their call sites instead. Instrument these helpers to do accounting
at the call site. Simple inlined allocation wrappers are converted
directly into macros. More complex allocators or allocators with
documentation are converted into _noprof versions and allocation hooks
are added. This allows memory allocation profiling mechanism to charge
allocations to the callers of these functions.

Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
---
Note: since this patch touches many files, get_maintainer.pl generates a
huge list. I trimmed it, leaving only maintainers and lists.

 drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h           |  5 ++--
 fs/nfs/iostat.h                         |  5 +---
 include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h       | 19 +++++---------
 include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h           | 35 +++++++++++++++----------
 include/crypto/hash.h                   |  7 ++---
 include/crypto/internal/acompress.h     |  5 ++--
 include/crypto/skcipher.h               |  7 ++---
 include/linux/bpf.h                     | 33 ++++++-----------------
 include/linux/bpfptr.h                  |  5 ++--
 include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h         |  5 +---
 include/linux/hid_bpf.h                 |  5 +---
 include/linux/jbd2.h                    | 10 ++-----
 include/linux/mm.h                      |  5 ++--
 include/linux/mm_types.h                |  5 ++--
 include/linux/percpu.h                  |  3 +++
 include/linux/ptr_ring.h                | 28 +++++++++++---------
 include/linux/skb_array.h               | 19 ++++++++------
 include/linux/skbuff.h                  | 20 ++++++--------
 include/linux/skmsg.h                   |  7 ++---
 include/linux/slab.h                    |  5 ++++
 include/linux/sockptr.h                 | 10 ++++---
 include/net/netlabel.h                  | 16 ++++++-----
 include/net/netlink.h                   |  5 ++--
 include/net/request_sock.h              |  5 ++--
 include/net/tcx.h                       |  5 ++--
 net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss_internal.h |  6 +++--
 26 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)


base-commit: e04f729678f630b7304f9a8d5d22819fe589681a

Comments

Matthew Wilcox April 4, 2024, 5:04 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> @@ -86,10 +86,7 @@ dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
>   *
>   * Returns a new struct dma_fence_chain object or NULL on failure.
>   */
> -static inline struct dma_fence_chain *dma_fence_chain_alloc(void)
> -{
> -	return kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL);
> -};
> +#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()	kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL)

You've removed some typesafety here.  Before, if I wrote:

	struct page *page = dma_fence_chain_alloc();

the compiler would warn me that I've done something stupid.  Now it
can't tell.  Suggest perhaps:

#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()						  \
	(struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), \
						GFP_KERNEL)

but maybe there's a better way of doing that.  There are a few other
occurrences of the same problem in this monster patch.

> +++ b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> @@ -149,10 +149,7 @@ static inline int hid_bpf_connect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) { return 0; }
>  static inline void hid_bpf_disconnect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) {}
>  static inline void hid_bpf_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hid) {}
>  static inline void hid_bpf_device_init(struct hid_device *hid) {}
> -static inline u8 *call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *size)
> -{
> -	return kmemdup(rdesc, *size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -}
> +#define call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(_hdev, _rdesc, _size) kmemdup(_rdesc, *(_size), GFP_KERNEL)

here

> -static inline handle_t *jbd2_alloc_handle(gfp_t gfp_flags)
> -{
> -	return kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, gfp_flags);
> -}
> +#define jbd2_alloc_handle(_gfp_flags)	kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, _gfp_flags)

here

> +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> @@ -410,11 +410,8 @@ void sk_psock_stop_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
>  int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
>  			 struct sk_msg *msg);
>  
> -static inline struct sk_psock_link *sk_psock_init_link(void)
> -{
> -	return kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link),
> -		       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> -}
> +#define sk_psock_init_link()	\
> +		kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN)

here

... I kind of gave up at this point.  You'll want to audit for yourself
anyway ;-)
Suren Baghdasaryan April 4, 2024, 5:08 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:04 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> > @@ -86,10 +86,7 @@ dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
> >   *
> >   * Returns a new struct dma_fence_chain object or NULL on failure.
> >   */
> > -static inline struct dma_fence_chain *dma_fence_chain_alloc(void)
> > -{
> > -     return kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -};
> > +#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()      kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL)
>
> You've removed some typesafety here.  Before, if I wrote:
>
>         struct page *page = dma_fence_chain_alloc();
>
> the compiler would warn me that I've done something stupid.  Now it
> can't tell.  Suggest perhaps:
>
> #define dma_fence_chain_alloc()                                           \
>         (struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), \
>                                                 GFP_KERNEL)
>
> but maybe there's a better way of doing that.  There are a few other
> occurrences of the same problem in this monster patch.

Got your point.

>
> > +++ b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> > @@ -149,10 +149,7 @@ static inline int hid_bpf_connect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) { return 0; }
> >  static inline void hid_bpf_disconnect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) {}
> >  static inline void hid_bpf_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hid) {}
> >  static inline void hid_bpf_device_init(struct hid_device *hid) {}
> > -static inline u8 *call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *size)
> > -{
> > -     return kmemdup(rdesc, *size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -}
> > +#define call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(_hdev, _rdesc, _size) kmemdup(_rdesc, *(_size), GFP_KERNEL)
>
> here
>
> > -static inline handle_t *jbd2_alloc_handle(gfp_t gfp_flags)
> > -{
> > -     return kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, gfp_flags);
> > -}
> > +#define jbd2_alloc_handle(_gfp_flags)        kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, _gfp_flags)
>
> here
>
> > +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> > @@ -410,11 +410,8 @@ void sk_psock_stop_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
> >  int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
> >                        struct sk_msg *msg);
> >
> > -static inline struct sk_psock_link *sk_psock_init_link(void)
> > -{
> > -     return kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link),
> > -                    GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > -}
> > +#define sk_psock_init_link() \
> > +             kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN)
>
> here
>
> ... I kind of gave up at this point.  You'll want to audit for yourself
> anyway ;-)

Yes, I'll go over it and will make the required changes. Thanks for
looking into it!
Suren.
Suren Baghdasaryan April 4, 2024, 10:17 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:08 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:04 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> > > @@ -86,10 +86,7 @@ dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > >   *
> > >   * Returns a new struct dma_fence_chain object or NULL on failure.
> > >   */
> > > -static inline struct dma_fence_chain *dma_fence_chain_alloc(void)
> > > -{
> > > -     return kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > -};
> > > +#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()      kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL)
> >
> > You've removed some typesafety here.  Before, if I wrote:
> >
> >         struct page *page = dma_fence_chain_alloc();
> >
> > the compiler would warn me that I've done something stupid.  Now it
> > can't tell.  Suggest perhaps:
> >
> > #define dma_fence_chain_alloc()                                           \
> >         (struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), \
> >                                                 GFP_KERNEL)
> >
> > but maybe there's a better way of doing that.  There are a few other
> > occurrences of the same problem in this monster patch.
>
> Got your point.

Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:

WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
#425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
+ ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
GFP_KERNEL))

I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
expected type)?

>
> >
> > > +++ b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> > > @@ -149,10 +149,7 @@ static inline int hid_bpf_connect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) { return 0; }
> > >  static inline void hid_bpf_disconnect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) {}
> > >  static inline void hid_bpf_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hid) {}
> > >  static inline void hid_bpf_device_init(struct hid_device *hid) {}
> > > -static inline u8 *call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *size)
> > > -{
> > > -     return kmemdup(rdesc, *size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > -}
> > > +#define call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(_hdev, _rdesc, _size) kmemdup(_rdesc, *(_size), GFP_KERNEL)
> >
> > here
> >
> > > -static inline handle_t *jbd2_alloc_handle(gfp_t gfp_flags)
> > > -{
> > > -     return kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, gfp_flags);
> > > -}
> > > +#define jbd2_alloc_handle(_gfp_flags)        kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, _gfp_flags)
> >
> > here
> >
> > > +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> > > @@ -410,11 +410,8 @@ void sk_psock_stop_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
> > >  int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
> > >                        struct sk_msg *msg);
> > >
> > > -static inline struct sk_psock_link *sk_psock_init_link(void)
> > > -{
> > > -     return kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link),
> > > -                    GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > > -}
> > > +#define sk_psock_init_link() \
> > > +             kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN)
> >
> > here
> >
> > ... I kind of gave up at this point.  You'll want to audit for yourself
> > anyway ;-)
>
> Yes, I'll go over it and will make the required changes. Thanks for
> looking into it!
> Suren.
Kent Overstreet April 4, 2024, 10:28 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:08 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:04 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> > > > @@ -86,10 +86,7 @@ dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > > >   *
> > > >   * Returns a new struct dma_fence_chain object or NULL on failure.
> > > >   */
> > > > -static inline struct dma_fence_chain *dma_fence_chain_alloc(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -     return kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > -};
> > > > +#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()      kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL)
> > >
> > > You've removed some typesafety here.  Before, if I wrote:
> > >
> > >         struct page *page = dma_fence_chain_alloc();
> > >
> > > the compiler would warn me that I've done something stupid.  Now it
> > > can't tell.  Suggest perhaps:
> > >
> > > #define dma_fence_chain_alloc()                                           \
> > >         (struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), \
> > >                                                 GFP_KERNEL)
> > >
> > > but maybe there's a better way of doing that.  There are a few other
> > > occurrences of the same problem in this monster patch.
> >
> > Got your point.
> 
> Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> 
> WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> GFP_KERNEL))
> 
> I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> expected type)?

Correct, it's not hiding bugs in this case, it's adding type safety.

checkpatch is definitely not authoritative, you really have to use your
own judgement with it
Matthew Wilcox April 4, 2024, 10:33 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> 
> WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> GFP_KERNEL))
> 
> I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> expected type)?

I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.

I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
Kent Overstreet April 4, 2024, 10:38 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > 
> > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > GFP_KERNEL))
> > 
> > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > expected type)?
> 
> I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> 
> I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.

Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
Andrew Morton April 4, 2024, 10:41 p.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > 
> > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > 
> > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > expected type)?
> > 
> > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > 
> > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> 
> Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.

I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
reasoning here.
Kent Overstreet April 4, 2024, 11 p.m. UTC | #8
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > 
> > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > 
> > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > expected type)?
> > > 
> > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > 
> > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > 
> > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> 
> I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> reasoning here.

I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
than hot takes.

But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
question.

Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
that harder.

Additionally: the alloc_hooks() macro is for more than this. It's also
for more usable fault injection - remember every thread we have where
people are begging for every allocation to be __GFP_NOFAIL - "oh, error
paths are hard to test, let's just get rid of them" - never mind that
actually do have to have error paths - but _per callsite_ selectable
fault injection will actually make it practical to test memory error
paths.

And Kees working on stuff that'll make use of the alloc_hooks() macro
for segregating kmem_caches.

This is all stuff that I've explained before; let's please dial back on
the whining - or I'll just bookmark this for next time...
Suren Baghdasaryan April 4, 2024, 11:16 p.m. UTC | #9
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:01 PM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > >
> > > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > > expected type)?
> > > >
> > > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > >
> > > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > >
> > > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> >
> > I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> > reasoning here.
>
> I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
> you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
> than hot takes.
>
> But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
> fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
> then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
> free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
> question.
>
> Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
> callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
> that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
> not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
> allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
> numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
> that harder.
>
> Additionally: the alloc_hooks() macro is for more than this. It's also
> for more usable fault injection - remember every thread we have where
> people are begging for every allocation to be __GFP_NOFAIL - "oh, error
> paths are hard to test, let's just get rid of them" - never mind that
> actually do have to have error paths - but _per callsite_ selectable
> fault injection will actually make it practical to test memory error
> paths.
>
> And Kees working on stuff that'll make use of the alloc_hooks() macro
> for segregating kmem_caches.

Yeah, that pretty much summarizes it. Note that we don't have to make
the conversions in this patch and accounting will still work but then
all allocations from different callers will be accounted to the helper
function and that's less useful than accounting at the call site.
It's a sizable churn but the conversions are straight-forward and we
do get accurate, performant and easy to use memory accounting.

>
> This is all stuff that I've explained before; let's please dial back on
> the whining - or I'll just bookmark this for next time...
Jan Kara April 5, 2024, 9:53 a.m. UTC | #10
On Thu 04-04-24 16:16:15, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:01 PM Kent Overstreet
> <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > > > expected type)?
> > > > >
> > > > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > > >
> > > > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > > >
> > > > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > > > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> > >
> > > I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> > > reasoning here.
> >
> > I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
> > you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
> > than hot takes.
> >
> > But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
> > fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
> > then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
> > free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
> > question.
> >
> > Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
> > callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
> > that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
> > not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
> > allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
> > numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
> > that harder.
> >
> > Additionally: the alloc_hooks() macro is for more than this. It's also
> > for more usable fault injection - remember every thread we have where
> > people are begging for every allocation to be __GFP_NOFAIL - "oh, error
> > paths are hard to test, let's just get rid of them" - never mind that
> > actually do have to have error paths - but _per callsite_ selectable
> > fault injection will actually make it practical to test memory error
> > paths.
> >
> > And Kees working on stuff that'll make use of the alloc_hooks() macro
> > for segregating kmem_caches.
> 
> Yeah, that pretty much summarizes it. Note that we don't have to make
> the conversions in this patch and accounting will still work but then
> all allocations from different callers will be accounted to the helper
> function and that's less useful than accounting at the call site.
> It's a sizable churn but the conversions are straight-forward and we
> do get accurate, performant and easy to use memory accounting.

OK, fair enough. I guess I can live with the allocation macros in jbd2 if
type safety is preserved. But please provide a short summary of why we need
these macros (e.g. instead of RET_IP approach) in the changelog (or at
least a link to some email explaining this if the explanation would get too
long). Because I was wondering about the same as Andrew (and yes, this is
because I wasn't really following the huge discussion last time).

								Honza
Matthew Wilcox April 5, 2024, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #11
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:00:51PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > > 
> > > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > 
> > > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > > expected type)?
> > > > 
> > > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > > 
> > > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > > 
> > > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> > 
> > I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> > reasoning here.
> 
> I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
> you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
> than hot takes.

Well, /proc/vmallocinfo exists, and has existed since 2008, so this is
slightly more than a "hot take".

> But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
> fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
> then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
> free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
> question.

And yet vmalloc doesn't do that.

> Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
> callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
> that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
> not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
> allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
> numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
> that harder.

I'm not convinced that _THIS_IP_ is less precise than a codetag.  They
do essentially the same thing, except that codetags embed the source
location in the file while _THIS_IP_ requires a tool like faddr2line
to decode kernel_clone+0xc0/0x430 into a file + line number.

> This is all stuff that I've explained before; let's please dial back on
> the whining - or I'll just bookmark this for next time...

Please stop mischaracterising serious thoughtful criticism as whining.
I don't understand what value codetags bring over using _THIS_IP_ and
_RET_IP_ and you need to explain that.
Suren Baghdasaryan April 5, 2024, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #12
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:53 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu 04-04-24 16:16:15, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:01 PM Kent Overstreet
> > <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > > > > expected type)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > > > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > > > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > > > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > > > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > > > >
> > > > > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > > > > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> > > >
> > > > I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> > > > reasoning here.
> > >
> > > I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
> > > you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
> > > than hot takes.
> > >
> > > But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
> > > fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
> > > then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
> > > free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
> > > question.
> > >
> > > Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
> > > callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
> > > that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
> > > not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
> > > allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
> > > numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
> > > that harder.
> > >
> > > Additionally: the alloc_hooks() macro is for more than this. It's also
> > > for more usable fault injection - remember every thread we have where
> > > people are begging for every allocation to be __GFP_NOFAIL - "oh, error
> > > paths are hard to test, let's just get rid of them" - never mind that
> > > actually do have to have error paths - but _per callsite_ selectable
> > > fault injection will actually make it practical to test memory error
> > > paths.
> > >
> > > And Kees working on stuff that'll make use of the alloc_hooks() macro
> > > for segregating kmem_caches.
> >
> > Yeah, that pretty much summarizes it. Note that we don't have to make
> > the conversions in this patch and accounting will still work but then
> > all allocations from different callers will be accounted to the helper
> > function and that's less useful than accounting at the call site.
> > It's a sizable churn but the conversions are straight-forward and we
> > do get accurate, performant and easy to use memory accounting.
>
> OK, fair enough. I guess I can live with the allocation macros in jbd2 if
> type safety is preserved. But please provide a short summary of why we need
> these macros (e.g. instead of RET_IP approach) in the changelog (or at
> least a link to some email explaining this if the explanation would get too
> long). Because I was wondering about the same as Andrew (and yes, this is
> because I wasn't really following the huge discussion last time).

Ack. I'll write up the explanation or if there is a good one already
in our previous discussion will add a link to it. Thanks!

>
>                                                                 Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
Suren Baghdasaryan April 5, 2024, 1:53 p.m. UTC | #13
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:44 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:00:51PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:41:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:38:39 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:17:43PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > > Ironically, checkpatch generates warnings for these type casts:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WARNING: unnecessary cast may hide bugs, see
> > > > > > http://c-faq.com/malloc/mallocnocast.html
> > > > > > #425: FILE: include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h:90:
> > > > > > + ((struct dma_fence_chain *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain),
> > > > > > GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess I can safely ignore them in this case (since we cast to the
> > > > > > expected type)?
> > > > >
> > > > > I find ignoring checkpatch to be a solid move 99% of the time.
> > > > >
> > > > > I really don't like the codetags.  This is so much churn, and it could
> > > > > all be avoided by just passing in _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ depending on
> > > > > whether we wanted to profile this function or its caller.  vmalloc
> > > > > has done it this way since 2008 (OK, using __builtin_return_address())
> > > > > and lockdep has used _THIS_IP_ / _RET_IP_ since 2006.
> > > >
> > > > Except you can't. We've been over this; using that approach for tracing
> > > > is one thing, using it for actual accounting isn't workable.
> > >
> > > I missed that.  There have been many emails.  Please remind us of the
> > > reasoning here.
> >
> > I think it's on the other people claiming 'oh this would be so easy if
> > you just do it this other way' to put up some code - or at least more
> > than hot takes.
>
> Well, /proc/vmallocinfo exists, and has existed since 2008, so this is
> slightly more than a "hot take".
>
> > But, since you asked - one of the main goals of this patchset was to be
> > fast enough to run in production, and if you do it by return address
> > then you've added at minimum a hash table lookup to every allocate and
> > free; if you do that, running it in production is completely out of the
> > question.
>
> And yet vmalloc doesn't do that.
>
> > Besides that - the issues with annotating and tracking the correct
> > callsite really don't go away, they just shift around a bit. It's true
> > that the return address approach would be easier initially, but that's
> > not all we're concerned with; we're concerned with making sure
> > allocations get accounted to the _correct_ callsite so that we're giving
> > numbers that you can trust, and by making things less explicit you make
> > that harder.
>
> I'm not convinced that _THIS_IP_ is less precise than a codetag.  They
> do essentially the same thing, except that codetags embed the source
> location in the file while _THIS_IP_ requires a tool like faddr2line
> to decode kernel_clone+0xc0/0x430 into a file + line number.
>
> > This is all stuff that I've explained before; let's please dial back on
> > the whining - or I'll just bookmark this for next time...
>
> Please stop mischaracterising serious thoughtful criticism as whining.
> I don't understand what value codetags bring over using _THIS_IP_ and
> _RET_IP_ and you need to explain that.

The conceptual difference between codetag and _THIS_IP_/_RET_IP_ is
that codetag injects counters at the call site, so you don't need to
spend time finding the appropriate counter to operate on during
allocation.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h
index f482aab420f7..52575ba9a141 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu.h
@@ -134,13 +134,14 @@  static inline int get_pci_sbdf_id(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	return PCI_SEG_DEVID_TO_SBDF(seg, devid);
 }
 
-static inline void *alloc_pgtable_page(int nid, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline void *alloc_pgtable_page_noprof(int nid, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct page *page;
 
-	page = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
+	page = alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid, gfp | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
 	return page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
 }
+#define alloc_pgtable_page(...)	alloc_hooks(alloc_pgtable_page_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /*
  * This must be called after device probe completes. During probe
diff --git a/fs/nfs/iostat.h b/fs/nfs/iostat.h
index 5aa776b5a3e7..b17a9eb9b148 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/iostat.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/iostat.h
@@ -46,10 +46,7 @@  static inline void nfs_add_stats(const struct inode *inode,
 	nfs_add_server_stats(NFS_SERVER(inode), stat, addend);
 }
 
-static inline struct nfs_iostats __percpu *nfs_alloc_iostats(void)
-{
-	return alloc_percpu(struct nfs_iostats);
-}
+#define nfs_alloc_iostats()	alloc_percpu(struct nfs_iostats)
 
 static inline void nfs_free_iostats(struct nfs_iostats __percpu *stats)
 {
diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h
index 600d4e2641da..62cac266a1c8 100644
--- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h
+++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h
@@ -47,26 +47,19 @@  acpi_status acpi_os_terminate(void);
  * However, boot has  (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
  * to quiet __might_sleep() in kmalloc() and resume does not.
  */
-static inline void *acpi_os_allocate(acpi_size size)
-{
-	return kmalloc(size, irqs_disabled()? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
-}
+#define acpi_os_allocate(_size)	\
+		kmalloc(_size, irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL)
 
-static inline void *acpi_os_allocate_zeroed(acpi_size size)
-{
-	return kzalloc(size, irqs_disabled()? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
-}
+#define acpi_os_allocate_zeroed(_size)	\
+		kzalloc(_size, irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL)
 
 static inline void acpi_os_free(void *memory)
 {
 	kfree(memory);
 }
 
-static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
-{
-	return kmem_cache_zalloc(cache,
-				 irqs_disabled()? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
-}
+#define acpi_os_acquire_object(_cache)	\
+		kmem_cache_zalloc(_cache, irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL)
 
 static inline acpi_thread_id acpi_os_get_thread_id(void)
 {
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
index 879e5f8aa5e9..7c48f5fbf8aa 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
@@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ 
  *
  * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pte_t *__pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline pte_t *__pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	struct ptdesc *ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL &
+	struct ptdesc *ptdesc = pagetable_alloc_noprof(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL &
 			~__GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
 
 	if (!ptdesc)
 		return NULL;
 	return ptdesc_address(ptdesc);
 }
+#define __pte_alloc_one_kernel(...)	alloc_hooks(__pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ALLOC_ONE_KERNEL
 /**
@@ -33,10 +34,11 @@  static inline pte_t *__pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
  *
  * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return __pte_alloc_one_kernel(mm);
+	return __pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(mm);
 }
+#define pte_alloc_one_kernel(...)	alloc_hooks(pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 #endif
 
 /**
@@ -61,11 +63,11 @@  static inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
  *
  * Return: `struct page` referencing the ptdesc or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pgtable_t __pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline pgtable_t __pte_alloc_one_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
 
-	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(gfp, 0);
+	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc_noprof(gfp, 0);
 	if (!ptdesc)
 		return NULL;
 	if (!pagetable_pte_ctor(ptdesc)) {
@@ -75,6 +77,7 @@  static inline pgtable_t __pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
 
 	return ptdesc_page(ptdesc);
 }
+#define __pte_alloc_one(...)	alloc_hooks(__pte_alloc_one_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ALLOC_ONE
 /**
@@ -85,10 +88,11 @@  static inline pgtable_t __pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
  *
  * Return: `struct page` referencing the ptdesc or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline pgtable_t pte_alloc_one_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return __pte_alloc_one(mm, GFP_PGTABLE_USER);
+	return __pte_alloc_one_noprof(mm, GFP_PGTABLE_USER);
 }
+#define pte_alloc_one(...)	alloc_hooks(pte_alloc_one_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -124,14 +128,14 @@  static inline void pte_free(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *pte_page)
  *
  * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
 	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_USER;
 
 	if (mm == &init_mm)
 		gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL;
-	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(gfp, 0);
+	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc_noprof(gfp, 0);
 	if (!ptdesc)
 		return NULL;
 	if (!pagetable_pmd_ctor(ptdesc)) {
@@ -140,6 +144,7 @@  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 	}
 	return ptdesc_address(ptdesc);
 }
+#define pmd_alloc_one(...)	alloc_hooks(pmd_alloc_one_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 #endif
 
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMD_FREE
@@ -157,7 +162,7 @@  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
 
 #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3
 
-static inline pud_t *__pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+static inline pud_t *__pud_alloc_one_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_USER;
 	struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
@@ -166,13 +171,14 @@  static inline pud_t *__pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 		gfp = GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL;
 	gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
 
-	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(gfp, 0);
+	ptdesc = pagetable_alloc_noprof(gfp, 0);
 	if (!ptdesc)
 		return NULL;
 
 	pagetable_pud_ctor(ptdesc);
 	return ptdesc_address(ptdesc);
 }
+#define __pud_alloc_one(...)	alloc_hooks(__pud_alloc_one_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PUD_ALLOC_ONE
 /**
@@ -184,10 +190,11 @@  static inline pud_t *__pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
  *
  * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
  */
-static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
-	return __pud_alloc_one(mm, addr);
+	return __pud_alloc_one_noprof(mm, addr);
 }
+#define pud_alloc_one(...)	alloc_hooks(pud_alloc_one_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 #endif
 
 static inline void __pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud)
diff --git a/include/crypto/hash.h b/include/crypto/hash.h
index 5d61f576cfc8..e5181cc9b7c5 100644
--- a/include/crypto/hash.h
+++ b/include/crypto/hash.h
@@ -578,19 +578,20 @@  static inline void ahash_request_set_tfm(struct ahash_request *req,
  *
  * Return: allocated request handle in case of success, or NULL if out of memory
  */
-static inline struct ahash_request *ahash_request_alloc(
+static inline struct ahash_request *ahash_request_alloc_noprof(
 	struct crypto_ahash *tfm, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct ahash_request *req;
 
-	req = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ahash_request) +
-		      crypto_ahash_reqsize(tfm), gfp);
+	req = kmalloc_noprof(sizeof(struct ahash_request) +
+			     crypto_ahash_reqsize(tfm), gfp);
 
 	if (likely(req))
 		ahash_request_set_tfm(req, tfm);
 
 	return req;
 }
+#define ahash_request_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(ahash_request_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * ahash_request_free() - zeroize and free the request data structure
diff --git a/include/crypto/internal/acompress.h b/include/crypto/internal/acompress.h
index 4ac46bafba9d..2a67793f52ad 100644
--- a/include/crypto/internal/acompress.h
+++ b/include/crypto/internal/acompress.h
@@ -69,15 +69,16 @@  static inline void acomp_request_complete(struct acomp_req *req,
 	crypto_request_complete(&req->base, err);
 }
 
-static inline struct acomp_req *__acomp_request_alloc(struct crypto_acomp *tfm)
+static inline struct acomp_req *__acomp_request_alloc_noprof(struct crypto_acomp *tfm)
 {
 	struct acomp_req *req;
 
-	req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + crypto_acomp_reqsize(tfm), GFP_KERNEL);
+	req = kzalloc_noprof(sizeof(*req) + crypto_acomp_reqsize(tfm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (likely(req))
 		acomp_request_set_tfm(req, tfm);
 	return req;
 }
+#define __acomp_request_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(__acomp_request_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void __acomp_request_free(struct acomp_req *req)
 {
diff --git a/include/crypto/skcipher.h b/include/crypto/skcipher.h
index c8857d7bdb37..6c5330e316b0 100644
--- a/include/crypto/skcipher.h
+++ b/include/crypto/skcipher.h
@@ -861,19 +861,20 @@  static inline struct skcipher_request *skcipher_request_cast(
  *
  * Return: allocated request handle in case of success, or NULL if out of memory
  */
-static inline struct skcipher_request *skcipher_request_alloc(
+static inline struct skcipher_request *skcipher_request_alloc_noprof(
 	struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct skcipher_request *req;
 
-	req = kmalloc(sizeof(struct skcipher_request) +
-		      crypto_skcipher_reqsize(tfm), gfp);
+	req = kmalloc_noprof(sizeof(struct skcipher_request) +
+			     crypto_skcipher_reqsize(tfm), gfp);
 
 	if (likely(req))
 		skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, tfm);
 
 	return req;
 }
+#define skcipher_request_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(skcipher_request_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * skcipher_request_free() - zeroize and free request data structure
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 4f20f62f9d63..a63fa48ab80d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2230,31 +2230,14 @@  void *bpf_map_kvcalloc(struct bpf_map *map, size_t n, size_t size,
 void __percpu *bpf_map_alloc_percpu(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t size,
 				    size_t align, gfp_t flags);
 #else
-static inline void *
-bpf_map_kmalloc_node(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t size, gfp_t flags,
-		     int node)
-{
-	return kmalloc_node(size, flags, node);
-}
-
-static inline void *
-bpf_map_kzalloc(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
-{
-	return kzalloc(size, flags);
-}
-
-static inline void *
-bpf_map_kvcalloc(struct bpf_map *map, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
-{
-	return kvcalloc(n, size, flags);
-}
-
-static inline void __percpu *
-bpf_map_alloc_percpu(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t size, size_t align,
-		     gfp_t flags)
-{
-	return __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, align, flags);
-}
+#define bpf_map_kmalloc_node(_map, _size, _flags, _node)	\
+		kmalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node)
+#define bpf_map_kzalloc(_map, _size, _flags)			\
+		kzalloc(_size, _flags)
+#define bpf_map_kvcalloc(_map, _n, _size, _flags)		\
+		kvcalloc(_n, _size, _flags)
+#define bpf_map_alloc_percpu(_map, _size, _align, _flags)	\
+		__alloc_percpu_gfp(_size, _align, _flags)
 #endif
 
 static inline int
diff --git a/include/linux/bpfptr.h b/include/linux/bpfptr.h
index 79b2f78eec1a..1af241525a17 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpfptr.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpfptr.h
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@  static inline int copy_to_bpfptr_offset(bpfptr_t dst, size_t offset,
 	return copy_to_sockptr_offset((sockptr_t) dst, offset, src, size);
 }
 
-static inline void *kvmemdup_bpfptr(bpfptr_t src, size_t len)
+static inline void *kvmemdup_bpfptr_noprof(bpfptr_t src, size_t len)
 {
-	void *p = kvmalloc(len, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	void *p = kvmalloc_noprof(len, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
 
 	if (!p)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@  static inline void *kvmemdup_bpfptr(bpfptr_t src, size_t len)
 	}
 	return p;
 }
+#define kvmemdup_bpfptr(...)	alloc_hooks(kvmemdup_bpfptr_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline long strncpy_from_bpfptr(char *dst, bpfptr_t src, size_t count)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
index 4bdf0b96da28..6020dfd4498d 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
@@ -86,10 +86,7 @@  dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
  *
  * Returns a new struct dma_fence_chain object or NULL on failure.
  */
-static inline struct dma_fence_chain *dma_fence_chain_alloc(void)
-{
-	return kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL);
-};
+#define dma_fence_chain_alloc()	kmalloc(sizeof(struct dma_fence_chain), GFP_KERNEL)
 
 /**
  * dma_fence_chain_free
diff --git a/include/linux/hid_bpf.h b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
index 7118ac28d468..58111d3229f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
@@ -149,10 +149,7 @@  static inline int hid_bpf_connect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) { return 0; }
 static inline void hid_bpf_disconnect_device(struct hid_device *hdev) {}
 static inline void hid_bpf_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hid) {}
 static inline void hid_bpf_device_init(struct hid_device *hid) {}
-static inline u8 *call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *size)
-{
-	return kmemdup(rdesc, *size, GFP_KERNEL);
-}
+#define call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(_hdev, _rdesc, _size) kmemdup(_rdesc, *(_size), GFP_KERNEL)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_HID_BPF */
 
diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
index 971f3e826e15..4f2835e1dd2c 100644
--- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
+++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
@@ -1586,10 +1586,7 @@  void jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(struct journal_head *jh);
  */
 extern struct kmem_cache *jbd2_handle_cache;
 
-static inline handle_t *jbd2_alloc_handle(gfp_t gfp_flags)
-{
-	return kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, gfp_flags);
-}
+#define jbd2_alloc_handle(_gfp_flags)	kmem_cache_zalloc(jbd2_handle_cache, _gfp_flags)
 
 static inline void jbd2_free_handle(handle_t *handle)
 {
@@ -1602,10 +1599,7 @@  static inline void jbd2_free_handle(handle_t *handle)
  */
 extern struct kmem_cache *jbd2_inode_cache;
 
-static inline struct jbd2_inode *jbd2_alloc_inode(gfp_t gfp_flags)
-{
-	return kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_inode_cache, gfp_flags);
-}
+#define jbd2_alloc_inode(_gfp_flags)	kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_inode_cache, _gfp_flags)
 
 static inline void jbd2_free_inode(struct jbd2_inode *jinode)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index bc0cd34a8042..fcf1c579e220 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2884,12 +2884,13 @@  static inline bool pagetable_is_reserved(struct ptdesc *pt)
  *
  * Return: The ptdesc describing the allocated page tables.
  */
-static inline struct ptdesc *pagetable_alloc(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order)
+static inline struct ptdesc *pagetable_alloc_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order)
 {
-	struct page *page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_COMP, order);
+	struct page *page = alloc_pages_noprof(gfp | __GFP_COMP, order);
 
 	return page_ptdesc(page);
 }
+#define pagetable_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(pagetable_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * pagetable_free - Free pagetables
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 4260c595a79d..fa0d6995706f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1166,14 +1166,15 @@  static inline void mm_init_cid(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	cpumask_clear(mm_cidmask(mm));
 }
 
-static inline int mm_alloc_cid(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static inline int mm_alloc_cid_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	mm->pcpu_cid = alloc_percpu(struct mm_cid);
+	mm->pcpu_cid = alloc_percpu_noprof(struct mm_cid);
 	if (!mm->pcpu_cid)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	mm_init_cid(mm);
 	return 0;
 }
+#define mm_alloc_cid(...)	alloc_hooks(mm_alloc_cid_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void mm_destroy_cid(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
index e54921c79c9a..a790afba9386 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
@@ -151,6 +151,9 @@  extern size_t pcpu_alloc_size(void __percpu *__pdata);
 #define alloc_percpu(type)						\
 	(typeof(type) __percpu *)__alloc_percpu(sizeof(type),		\
 						__alignof__(type))
+#define alloc_percpu_noprof(type)					\
+	((typeof(type) __percpu *)pcpu_alloc_noprof(sizeof(type),	\
+					__alignof__(type), false, GFP_KERNEL))
 
 extern void free_percpu(void __percpu *__pdata);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 808f9d3ee546..fd037c127bb0 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -464,11 +464,11 @@  static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_bh(struct ptr_ring *r,
 /* Not all gfp_t flags (besides GFP_KERNEL) are allowed. See
  * documentation for vmalloc for which of them are legal.
  */
-static inline void **__ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline void **__ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc_noprof(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(void *))
 		return NULL;
-	return kvmalloc_array(size, sizeof(void *), gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return kvmalloc_array_noprof(size, sizeof(void *), gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
 }
 
 static inline void __ptr_ring_set_size(struct ptr_ring *r, int size)
@@ -484,9 +484,9 @@  static inline void __ptr_ring_set_size(struct ptr_ring *r, int size)
 		r->batch = 1;
 }
 
-static inline int ptr_ring_init(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline int ptr_ring_init_noprof(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	r->queue = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(size, gfp);
+	r->queue = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc_noprof(size, gfp);
 	if (!r->queue)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@  static inline int ptr_ring_init(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#define ptr_ring_init(...)	alloc_hooks(ptr_ring_init_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /*
  * Return entries into ring. Destroy entries that don't fit.
@@ -587,11 +588,11 @@  static inline void **__ptr_ring_swap_queue(struct ptr_ring *r, void **queue,
  * In particular if you consume ring in interrupt or BH context, you must
  * disable interrupts/BH when doing so.
  */
-static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp,
+static inline int ptr_ring_resize_noprof(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp,
 				  void (*destroy)(void *))
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	void **queue = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(size, gfp);
+	void **queue = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc_noprof(size, gfp);
 	void **old;
 
 	if (!queue)
@@ -609,6 +610,7 @@  static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp,
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#define ptr_ring_resize(...)	alloc_hooks(ptr_ring_resize_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /*
  * Note: producer lock is nested within consumer lock, so if you
@@ -616,21 +618,21 @@  static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp,
  * In particular if you consume ring in interrupt or BH context, you must
  * disable interrupts/BH when doing so.
  */
-static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings,
-					   unsigned int nrings,
-					   int size,
-					   gfp_t gfp, void (*destroy)(void *))
+static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple_noprof(struct ptr_ring **rings,
+						  unsigned int nrings,
+						  int size,
+						  gfp_t gfp, void (*destroy)(void *))
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	void ***queues;
 	int i;
 
-	queues = kmalloc_array(nrings, sizeof(*queues), gfp);
+	queues = kmalloc_array_noprof(nrings, sizeof(*queues), gfp);
 	if (!queues)
 		goto noqueues;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nrings; ++i) {
-		queues[i] = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(size, gfp);
+		queues[i] = __ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc_noprof(size, gfp);
 		if (!queues[i])
 			goto nomem;
 	}
@@ -660,6 +662,8 @@  static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings,
 noqueues:
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
+#define ptr_ring_resize_multiple(...) \
+		alloc_hooks(ptr_ring_resize_multiple_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void ptr_ring_cleanup(struct ptr_ring *r, void (*destroy)(void *))
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/skb_array.h b/include/linux/skb_array.h
index e2d45b7cb619..926496c9cc9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/skb_array.h
+++ b/include/linux/skb_array.h
@@ -177,10 +177,11 @@  static inline int skb_array_peek_len_any(struct skb_array *a)
 	return PTR_RING_PEEK_CALL_ANY(&a->ring, __skb_array_len_with_tag);
 }
 
-static inline int skb_array_init(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline int skb_array_init_noprof(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	return ptr_ring_init(&a->ring, size, gfp);
+	return ptr_ring_init_noprof(&a->ring, size, gfp);
 }
+#define skb_array_init(...)	alloc_hooks(skb_array_init_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static void __skb_array_destroy_skb(void *ptr)
 {
@@ -198,15 +199,17 @@  static inline int skb_array_resize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp)
 	return ptr_ring_resize(&a->ring, size, gfp, __skb_array_destroy_skb);
 }
 
-static inline int skb_array_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings,
-					    int nrings, unsigned int size,
-					    gfp_t gfp)
+static inline int skb_array_resize_multiple_noprof(struct skb_array **rings,
+						   int nrings, unsigned int size,
+						   gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_array, ring));
-	return ptr_ring_resize_multiple((struct ptr_ring **)rings,
-					nrings, size, gfp,
-					__skb_array_destroy_skb);
+	return ptr_ring_resize_multiple_noprof((struct ptr_ring **)rings,
+					       nrings, size, gfp,
+					       __skb_array_destroy_skb);
 }
+#define skb_array_resize_multiple(...)	\
+		alloc_hooks(skb_array_resize_multiple_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void skb_array_cleanup(struct skb_array *a)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 9d24aec064e8..b72920c9887b 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -3371,7 +3371,7 @@  void __napi_kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum skb_drop_reason reason);
  *
  * %NULL is returned if there is no free memory.
 */
-static inline struct page *__dev_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask,
+static inline struct page *__dev_alloc_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp_mask,
 					     unsigned int order)
 {
 	/* This piece of code contains several assumptions.
@@ -3384,13 +3384,11 @@  static inline struct page *__dev_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	 */
 	gfp_mask |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_MEMALLOC;
 
-	return alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, order);
+	return alloc_pages_node_noprof(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, order);
 }
+#define __dev_alloc_pages(...)	alloc_hooks(__dev_alloc_pages_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
-static inline struct page *dev_alloc_pages(unsigned int order)
-{
-	return __dev_alloc_pages(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN, order);
-}
+#define dev_alloc_pages(_order) __dev_alloc_pages(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN, _order)
 
 /**
  * __dev_alloc_page - allocate a page for network Rx
@@ -3400,15 +3398,13 @@  static inline struct page *dev_alloc_pages(unsigned int order)
  *
  * %NULL is returned if there is no free memory.
  */
-static inline struct page *__dev_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+static inline struct page *__dev_alloc_page_noprof(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-	return __dev_alloc_pages(gfp_mask, 0);
+	return __dev_alloc_pages_noprof(gfp_mask, 0);
 }
+#define __dev_alloc_page(...)	alloc_hooks(__dev_alloc_page_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
-static inline struct page *dev_alloc_page(void)
-{
-	return dev_alloc_pages(0);
-}
+#define dev_alloc_page()	dev_alloc_pages(0)
 
 /**
  * dev_page_is_reusable - check whether a page can be reused for network Rx
diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index e65ec3fd2799..b3d95c15f45c 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -410,11 +410,8 @@  void sk_psock_stop_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
 int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
 			 struct sk_msg *msg);
 
-static inline struct sk_psock_link *sk_psock_init_link(void)
-{
-	return kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link),
-		       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
-}
+#define sk_psock_init_link()	\
+		kzalloc(sizeof(struct sk_psock_link), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN)
 
 static inline void sk_psock_free_link(struct sk_psock_link *link)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index c0be1cd03cf6..4cc37ef22aae 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -744,6 +744,9 @@  void *kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node,
  */
 #define kmalloc_track_caller(...)		kmalloc_node_track_caller(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
 
+#define kmalloc_track_caller_noprof(...)	\
+		kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_)
+
 static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *kmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags,
 							  int node)
 {
@@ -781,6 +784,7 @@  extern void *kvmalloc_node_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_si
 #define kvmalloc_node(...)			alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 #define kvmalloc(_size, _flags)			kvmalloc_node(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
+#define kvmalloc_noprof(_size, _flags)		kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
 #define kvzalloc(_size, _flags)			kvmalloc(_size, _flags|__GFP_ZERO)
 
 #define kvzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node)	kvmalloc_node(_size, _flags|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
@@ -797,6 +801,7 @@  static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *kvmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t si
 
 #define kvmalloc_array(...)			alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_array_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 #define kvcalloc(_n, _size, _flags)		kvmalloc_array(_n, _size, _flags|__GFP_ZERO)
+#define kvcalloc_noprof(_n, _size, _flags)	kvmalloc_array_noprof(_n, _size, _flags|__GFP_ZERO)
 
 extern void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t oldsize, size_t newsize, gfp_t flags)
 		      __realloc_size(3);
diff --git a/include/linux/sockptr.h b/include/linux/sockptr.h
index 307961b41541..ba703b22e7d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/sockptr.h
+++ b/include/linux/sockptr.h
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@  static inline int copy_to_sockptr(sockptr_t dst, const void *src, size_t size)
 	return copy_to_sockptr_offset(dst, 0, src, size);
 }
 
-static inline void *memdup_sockptr(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
+static inline void *memdup_sockptr_noprof(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
 {
-	void *p = kmalloc_track_caller(len, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	void *p = kmalloc_track_caller_noprof(len, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
 
 	if (!p)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -104,10 +104,11 @@  static inline void *memdup_sockptr(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
 	}
 	return p;
 }
+#define memdup_sockptr(...)	alloc_hooks(memdup_sockptr_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
-static inline void *memdup_sockptr_nul(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
+static inline void *memdup_sockptr_nul_noprof(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
 {
-	char *p = kmalloc_track_caller(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	char *p = kmalloc_track_caller_noprof(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!p)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@  static inline void *memdup_sockptr_nul(sockptr_t src, size_t len)
 	p[len] = '\0';
 	return p;
 }
+#define memdup_sockptr_nul(...)	alloc_hooks(memdup_sockptr_nul_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline long strncpy_from_sockptr(char *dst, sockptr_t src, size_t count)
 {
diff --git a/include/net/netlabel.h b/include/net/netlabel.h
index f3ab0b8a4b18..c31bd96dafdb 100644
--- a/include/net/netlabel.h
+++ b/include/net/netlabel.h
@@ -274,15 +274,17 @@  struct netlbl_calipso_ops {
  * on success, NULL on failure.
  *
  */
-static inline struct netlbl_lsm_cache *netlbl_secattr_cache_alloc(gfp_t flags)
+static inline struct netlbl_lsm_cache *netlbl_secattr_cache_alloc_noprof(gfp_t flags)
 {
 	struct netlbl_lsm_cache *cache;
 
-	cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), flags);
+	cache = kzalloc_noprof(sizeof(*cache), flags);
 	if (cache)
 		refcount_set(&cache->refcount, 1);
 	return cache;
 }
+#define netlbl_secattr_cache_alloc(...)	\
+		alloc_hooks(netlbl_secattr_cache_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * netlbl_secattr_cache_free - Frees a netlbl_lsm_cache struct
@@ -311,10 +313,11 @@  static inline void netlbl_secattr_cache_free(struct netlbl_lsm_cache *cache)
  * on failure.
  *
  */
-static inline struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *netlbl_catmap_alloc(gfp_t flags)
+static inline struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *netlbl_catmap_alloc_noprof(gfp_t flags)
 {
-	return kzalloc(sizeof(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap), flags);
+	return kzalloc_noprof(sizeof(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap), flags);
 }
+#define netlbl_catmap_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(netlbl_catmap_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * netlbl_catmap_free - Free a LSM secattr catmap
@@ -376,10 +379,11 @@  static inline void netlbl_secattr_destroy(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *secattr)
  * pointer on success, or NULL on failure.
  *
  */
-static inline struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *netlbl_secattr_alloc(gfp_t flags)
+static inline struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *netlbl_secattr_alloc_noprof(gfp_t flags)
 {
-	return kzalloc(sizeof(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr), flags);
+	return kzalloc_noprof(sizeof(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr), flags);
 }
+#define netlbl_secattr_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(netlbl_secattr_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * netlbl_secattr_free - Frees a netlbl_lsm_secattr struct
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index c19ff921b661..972b5484fa6f 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -1891,10 +1891,11 @@  static inline struct nla_bitfield32 nla_get_bitfield32(const struct nlattr *nla)
  * @src: netlink attribute to duplicate from
  * @gfp: GFP mask
  */
-static inline void *nla_memdup(const struct nlattr *src, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline void *nla_memdup_noprof(const struct nlattr *src, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	return kmemdup(nla_data(src), nla_len(src), gfp);
+	return kmemdup_noprof(nla_data(src), nla_len(src), gfp);
 }
+#define nla_memdup(...)	alloc_hooks(nla_memdup_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 /**
  * nla_nest_start_noflag - Start a new level of nested attributes
diff --git a/include/net/request_sock.h b/include/net/request_sock.h
index 004e651e6067..29495c331d20 100644
--- a/include/net/request_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/request_sock.h
@@ -127,12 +127,12 @@  static inline struct sock *skb_steal_sock(struct sk_buff *skb,
 }
 
 static inline struct request_sock *
-reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops, struct sock *sk_listener,
+reqsk_alloc_noprof(const struct request_sock_ops *ops, struct sock *sk_listener,
 	    bool attach_listener)
 {
 	struct request_sock *req;
 
-	req = kmem_cache_alloc(ops->slab, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	req = kmem_cache_alloc_noprof(ops->slab, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!req)
 		return NULL;
 	req->rsk_listener = NULL;
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@  reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops, struct sock *sk_listener,
 
 	return req;
 }
+#define reqsk_alloc(...)	alloc_hooks(reqsk_alloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void __reqsk_free(struct request_sock *req)
 {
diff --git a/include/net/tcx.h b/include/net/tcx.h
index 04be9377785d..72a3e75e539f 100644
--- a/include/net/tcx.h
+++ b/include/net/tcx.h
@@ -75,9 +75,9 @@  tcx_entry_fetch(struct net_device *dev, bool ingress)
 		return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->tcx_egress);
 }
 
-static inline struct bpf_mprog_entry *tcx_entry_create(void)
+static inline struct bpf_mprog_entry *tcx_entry_create_noprof(void)
 {
-	struct tcx_entry *tcx = kzalloc(sizeof(*tcx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	struct tcx_entry *tcx = kzalloc_noprof(sizeof(*tcx), GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (tcx) {
 		bpf_mprog_bundle_init(&tcx->bundle);
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@  static inline struct bpf_mprog_entry *tcx_entry_create(void)
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+#define tcx_entry_create(...)	alloc_hooks(tcx_entry_create_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void tcx_entry_free(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
 {
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss_internal.h b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss_internal.h
index c53b329092d4..4ebc1b7043d9 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss_internal.h
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss_internal.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@  simple_get_bytes(const void *p, const void *end, void *res, size_t len)
 }
 
 static inline const void *
-simple_get_netobj(const void *p, const void *end, struct xdr_netobj *dest)
+simple_get_netobj_noprof(const void *p, const void *end, struct xdr_netobj *dest)
 {
 	const void *q;
 	unsigned int len;
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@  simple_get_netobj(const void *p, const void *end, struct xdr_netobj *dest)
 	if (unlikely(q > end || q < p))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
 	if (len) {
-		dest->data = kmemdup(p, len, GFP_KERNEL);
+		dest->data = kmemdup_noprof(p, len, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (unlikely(dest->data == NULL))
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	} else
@@ -43,3 +43,5 @@  simple_get_netobj(const void *p, const void *end, struct xdr_netobj *dest)
 	dest->len = len;
 	return q;
 }
+
+#define simple_get_netobj(...)	alloc_hooks(simple_get_netobj_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))