From patchwork Tue Nov 7 10:37:09 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 10046311 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8108360360 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604A02A0B2 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 54EB62A0CB; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD47E2A0BA for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757333AbdKGKqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 05:46:55 -0500 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([194.213.3.17]:39785 "EHLO lhrrgout.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752862AbdKGKqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 05:46:51 -0500 Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DZI57694; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:46:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.204.65.254) by smtpsuk.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:46:17 +0000 From: Roberto Sassu To: CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v2 14/15] ima: add support for appraisal with digest lists Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:37:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20171107103710.10883-15-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20171107103710.10883-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20171107103710.10883-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.254] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.5A018F19.01DE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: de1a654781673b3fffb89b3a3d5e594c Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Appraisal verification consists on comparing the calculated digest of an accessed file with the value of the security.ima extended attribute. With digest lists, appraisal verification succeeds if the calculated digest is included in a list. Since the digital signature of each digest list is verified, it is not possible to allow access of unauthorized files. For mutable files, IMA writes the current digest to security.ima so that next file accesses are allowed even if the files have been modified. For immutable files, IMA writes security.ima only if also additional extended attributes should be protected by EVM. Otherwise, security.ima would be redundant, as digest lists provide reference values. When IMA writes security.ima, EVM calculates the HMAC based on the current value of protected extended attributes. Without file signatures, initial extended attribute values will not checked until digest lists include them. When extended attribute values are available, IMA will check them as the same as the digest, and will not write security.ima for immutable files if values are provided for all extended attributes protected by EVM. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 +++-- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 6 +++-- security/integrity/integrity.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index ddd0e1e7e99b..5f8e0740a33e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -261,7 +261,8 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len, int opened); + int xattr_len, int opened, + struct ima_digest *found_digest); int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); void ima_update_xattr(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file); enum integrity_status ima_get_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, @@ -277,7 +278,8 @@ static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len, int opened) + int xattr_len, int opened, + struct ima_digest *found_digest) { return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 1b2236e637ff..fd03a0278fba 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -201,17 +201,27 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len, int opened) + int xattr_len, int opened, + struct ima_digest *found_digest) { static const char op[] = "appraise_data"; char *cause = "unknown"; struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file); struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; - int rc = xattr_len, hash_start = 0; + struct evm_ima_xattr_data digest_list_value; + char *list_metadata = XATTR_NAME_IMA; + int rc = xattr_len, hash_start = 0, cache_flags_disabled = 0; if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) - return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; + return found_digest ? INTEGRITY_PASS : INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; + + if (found_digest && (!rc || rc == -ENODATA)) { + digest_list_value.type = found_digest->is_mutable ? + IMA_DIGEST_LIST_MUTABLE : IMA_DIGEST_LIST_IMMUTABLE; + xattr_value = &digest_list_value; + rc = sizeof(*xattr_value); + } if (rc <= 0) { if (rc && rc != -ENODATA) @@ -228,6 +238,9 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, goto out; } + if (xattr_value == &digest_list_value) + goto no_evm_check; + status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value, rc, iint); if ((status != INTEGRITY_PASS) && (status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN)) { if ((status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) @@ -237,13 +250,17 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, cause = "invalid-HMAC"; goto out; } + +no_evm_check: switch (xattr_value->type) { case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG: /* first byte contains algorithm id */ hash_start = 1; /* fall through */ case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: - if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + if (found_digest && !found_digest->is_mutable) + iint->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG; + else if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { cause = "IMA-signature-required"; status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; break; @@ -280,6 +297,25 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } break; + case IMA_DIGEST_LIST_MUTABLE: + if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + cause = "IMA-signature-required"; + status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + if (ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint) == -EROFS) + cache_flags_disabled = 1; + + status = INTEGRITY_PASS; + break; + case IMA_DIGEST_LIST_IMMUTABLE: + iint->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG; + if (!evm_set_includes_protected_xattrs(&list_metadata, 1)) + if (ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint) == -EROFS) + cache_flags_disabled = 1; + + status = INTEGRITY_PASS; + break; default: status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; cause = "unknown-ima-data"; @@ -302,7 +338,8 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode, filename, op, cause, rc, 0); } else { - ima_cache_flags(iint, func); + if (!cache_flags_disabled) + ima_cache_flags(iint, func); } ima_set_cache_status(iint, func, status); return status; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index d58199c8435c..a6cd414b46e3 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -270,7 +270,8 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size, action &= ~action_done; iint->flags |= (action_done << 1); - if (!(digest_lookup & IMA_APPRAISE)) + if (!(digest_lookup & IMA_APPRAISE) || + opened & FILE_CREATED) found_digest = NULL; if (digest_lookup & IMA_MEASURE) iint->measured_pcrs |= (0x1 << pcr); @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size, if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len, opened); + xattr_value, xattr_len, opened, + found_digest); if (action & IMA_MEASURE) ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname, xattr_value, xattr_len, pcr); diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index b46461a5f43f..f6b3c15dc57f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum evm_ima_xattr_type { EVM_XATTR_HMAC, EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG, IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG, + IMA_DIGEST_LIST_MUTABLE, + IMA_DIGEST_LIST_IMMUTABLE, IMA_XATTR_LAST };