From patchwork Tue Oct 9 17:30:35 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nayna X-Patchwork-Id: 10633041 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A03112B for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CF12818A for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 64A0E289A9; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:34:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D607D2818A for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727402AbeJJAw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:52:26 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:42624 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbeJJAw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:52:26 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w99HU7RS080504 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:34:22 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2n0xcvf198-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 13:34:22 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:34:20 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:34:16 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w99HYFki63570132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:34:15 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88765204F; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:33:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from swastik.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.195.38.245]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D035204E; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:33:43 +0100 (BST) From: Nayna Jain To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jforbes@redhat.com, seth.forshee@canonical.com, pjones@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Nayna Jain Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] ima: refactor ima_init_policy() Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 23:00:35 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: <20181009173037.32630-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20181009173037.32630-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18100917-0020-0000-0000-000002D1B51B X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18100917-0021-0000-0000-0000212021E8 Message-Id: <20181009173037.32630-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-10-09_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810090169 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Nayna Jain This patch removes the code duplication in ima_init_policy() by defining a new function named add_rules(). The new function adds the rules to the initial IMA policy, the custom policy or both based on the policy mask (IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY, IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY). Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 8c9499867c91..1e30d09a56db 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE, enum policy_types { ORIGINAL_TCB = 1, DEFAULT_TCB }; +enum policy_rule_list { IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY = 1, IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY }; + struct ima_rule_entry { struct list_head list; int action; @@ -473,6 +475,32 @@ static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func) return 0; } +static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count, + enum policy_rule_list policy_rule) +{ + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + struct ima_rule_entry *entry; + + if (policy_rule & IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY) + list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &ima_default_rules); + + if (policy_rule & IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY) { + entry = kmemdup(&entries[i], sizeof(*entry), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!entry) + continue; + + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules); + } + if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) + temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func); + if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK) + temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY; + } +} + /** * ima_init_policy - initialize the default measure rules. * @@ -481,28 +509,23 @@ static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func) */ void __init ima_init_policy(void) { - int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries, secure_boot_entries; - - /* if !ima_policy set entries = 0 so we load NO default rules */ - measure_entries = ima_policy ? ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules) : 0; - appraise_entries = ima_use_appraise_tcb ? - ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules) : 0; - secure_boot_entries = ima_use_secure_boot ? - ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules) : 0; + int build_appraise_entries; - for (i = 0; i < measure_entries; i++) - list_add_tail(&dont_measure_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); + /* if !ima_policy, we load NO default rules */ + if (ima_policy) + add_rules(dont_measure_rules, ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); switch (ima_policy) { case ORIGINAL_TCB: - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(original_measurement_rules); i++) - list_add_tail(&original_measurement_rules[i].list, - &ima_default_rules); + add_rules(original_measurement_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(original_measurement_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); break; case DEFAULT_TCB: - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules); i++) - list_add_tail(&default_measurement_rules[i].list, - &ima_default_rules); + add_rules(default_measurement_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); default: break; } @@ -511,38 +534,30 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) * Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file * signatures, prior to any other appraise rules. */ - for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) { - list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); - temp_ima_appraise |= - ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func); - } + if (ima_use_secure_boot) + add_rules(secure_boot_rules, ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); /* * Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures * for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise - * rules. + * rules. As the secure boot rules includes all of the build time + * rules, include either one or the other set of rules, but not both. */ - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) { - struct ima_rule_entry *entry; - - if (!secure_boot_entries) - list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list, - &ima_default_rules); - - entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (entry) - list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules); - build_ima_appraise |= - ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func); + build_appraise_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); + if (build_appraise_entries) { + if (ima_use_secure_boot) + add_rules(build_appraise_rules, build_appraise_entries, + IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY); + else + add_rules(build_appraise_rules, build_appraise_entries, + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY | IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY); } - for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) { - list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list, - &ima_default_rules); - if (default_appraise_rules[i].func == POLICY_CHECK) - temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY; - } + if (ima_use_appraise_tcb) + add_rules(default_appraise_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); ima_rules = &ima_default_rules; ima_update_policy_flag();