From patchwork Wed Jan 9 22:11:00 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefan Berger X-Patchwork-Id: 10754947 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01A213B4 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EB12965C for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A66B4296A2; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4897A2968E for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727620AbfAIWLR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:11:17 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33784 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727578AbfAIWLO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:11:14 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x09M9nso100238 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:11:13 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pws7vgres-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:11:12 -0500 Received: from localhost by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:12 -0000 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.19) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:10 -0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x09MB9ho20578446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:09 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A69ABE71E; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CA7BE70F; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:11:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Stefan Berger To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Berger Subject: [PATCH 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:11:00 -0500 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 In-Reply-To: <20190109221103.1897677-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20190109221103.1897677-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010922-0016-0000-0000-000009725C20 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010375; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000274; SDB=6.01144159; UDB=6.00595717; IPR=6.00924421; MB=3.00025056; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-09 22:11:11 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010922-0017-0000-0000-000041B5FFF1 Message-Id: <20190109221103.1897677-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-09_11:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901090176 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP TPM PPI 1.3 introduces a function revision 2 for some functions. So, rename the existing TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c index 90b69aeadc99..68cab248ca23 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ #include #include "tpm.h" -#define TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID 1 +#define TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 1 #define TPM_PPI_FN_VERSION 1 #define TPM_PPI_FN_SUBREQ 2 #define TPM_PPI_FN_GETREQ 3 @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_request(struct device *dev, struct tpm_chip *chip = to_tpm_chip(dev); obj = tpm_eval_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, TPM_PPI_FN_GETREQ, - ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, NULL, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID); + ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, NULL, TPM_PPI_REVISION_1); if (!obj) return -ENXIO; @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_store_ppi_request(struct device *dev, * version 1.1 */ if (acpi_check_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, - TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID, 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_SUBREQ2)) + TPM_PPI_REVISION_1, 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_SUBREQ2)) func = TPM_PPI_FN_SUBREQ2; /* @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_store_ppi_request(struct device *dev, } obj = tpm_eval_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, func, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, - &argv4, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID); + &argv4, TPM_PPI_REVISION_1); if (!obj) { return -ENXIO; } else { @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_transition_action(struct device *dev, if (strcmp(chip->ppi_version, "1.2") < 0) obj = &tmp; obj = tpm_eval_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, TPM_PPI_FN_GETACT, - ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, obj, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID); + ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, obj, TPM_PPI_REVISION_1); if (!obj) { return -ENXIO; } else { @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_response(struct device *dev, struct tpm_chip *chip = to_tpm_chip(dev); obj = tpm_eval_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, TPM_PPI_FN_GETRSP, - ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, NULL, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID); + ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, NULL, TPM_PPI_REVISION_1); if (!obj) return -ENXIO; @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static ssize_t show_ppi_operations(acpi_handle dev_handle, char *buf, u32 start, "User not required", }; - if (!acpi_check_dsm(dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID, + if (!acpi_check_dsm(dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, TPM_PPI_REVISION_1, 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_GETOPR)) return -EPERM; @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static ssize_t show_ppi_operations(acpi_handle dev_handle, char *buf, u32 start, tmp.integer.value = i; obj = tpm_eval_dsm(dev_handle, TPM_PPI_FN_GETOPR, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &argv, - TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID); + TPM_PPI_REVISION_1); if (!obj) { return -ENOMEM; } else { @@ -338,12 +338,12 @@ void tpm_add_ppi(struct tpm_chip *chip) return; if (!acpi_check_dsm(chip->acpi_dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, - TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID, 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_VERSION)) + TPM_PPI_REVISION_1, 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_VERSION)) return; /* Cache PPI version string. */ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(chip->acpi_dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, - TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID, TPM_PPI_FN_VERSION, + TPM_PPI_REVISION_1, TPM_PPI_FN_VERSION, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_STRING); if (obj) { strlcpy(chip->ppi_version, obj->string.pointer,