From patchwork Mon Oct 12 20:19:12 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Casey Schaufler X-Patchwork-Id: 11833763 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6CA92C for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0692087E for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b="Pc9tYWRA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728931AbgJLUbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:31:39 -0400 Received: from sonic317-38.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.184.49]:44083 "EHLO sonic317-38.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726597AbgJLUbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:31:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1602534697; bh=vVAwaQ/x03aXipfIdVlCB2SBwQLx1UNVfpY6RXv3qZ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=Pc9tYWRAlvME8qtnyltz/AqSPABvz/cDwxKYPw8kwB7IOdu8umCda06deP3zlpPuhpMUIgx/2gpcSG7rOrb9eIn+XwpypWGyjsE1ra2AP3+SlxDyiDOgNkft9+fNEdMJdMBa3fXdwi8PZj+KquPFlpAhDCQkdLWo274JIkyWP3W7GDl532SIl0naUmGlvVNCNJUY2JfkHz7vbtN6+1uBgS55HwFE/6DMABGte3QKscmB5IoajRaFK/5bOULnKxm+zc88h9KCqpvW3R7k/XpiTSTgvn/8FXrrRpkSkBDF/n3WIrjKMzOjt2mzz79RnFS0snIIZzCE5apuj42EhMDFKA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1602534697; bh=R75PYXL/sAM/xyEKvnQl5fepkY9TJQkter2761hJsaJ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=GhtJdaEjNXpDGmjpdmcfD22nvpVjX8368B02aFepthkFoRLd2N88aGWeJikQTRZ7qMCDZDRVxfmaY9DXz+bilkziYG7vhoblDWgQmW2CCe0PMJ9gOtvFsfjcMau6Vs7XHbLh0PRgx5gWyrufMP8NedfqyNlQuLAVmsg1//P9cfq7B1EKNR53nq5Oqk/J5z9GzGkNO+S/WCKxCeLfb+BdWwkdX0ilnsN3pupXFuO4aGhu1JlrpJssjGrptXkjTYSCq1HbLtLLDn0wRvZFqBipcc3k136r9upFMiGpxhVyXp9+ovTmM1THu0fyzUwAZrGMqBxQta9kuUszS2ZvdoaOYw== X-YMail-OSG: k.jWv80VM1mf84CacHQDk7W1D0pmZf6RiZlEggr6XCmP.PW8laIEqNGQgIuibLx cJ9DKSJDjKcTmS5_rZRcM6AF8YNHjze470.zbcvl7PM_brtQty7Xd1rKVg0gZIWbcDQgcqRF.xiG ZlzK41uaW.XkspJpa664WzemOXm4FaAbcpmSLfVbfuRoy4Zkn0QmxgTH9YkS9zz9pKMSi5K6whYC ZBB6m4w_RzBW2SIlO9Ncd_15u.Wz0ISSr6kT_vZt327mh_szW2o3l_yW0sKhtbxgYLuiXxcYn32W B_5u3ii8w26wewVnUcSz_gfQztoI86Vc440CIxJrow1Lvk06xWtl7zTX5UHCr7EycqrjI.OjQNzN RzHZmQDeFvTXSVUV4IXbOVkz7qk2MmGM17mz6xuZiBJ5c.Y.LA9eBM9sZy9pBpbqVVxG7MWQ27MI yskEP9CVdgJinFTkIdHPKqNYUKSK6YwDVZPVGiIhRQla3RD6wLP7WqFLnUhtr0gORS1ah.OLYdvr aTDWlWtYxlFb0umA1.3w4merDs5bzd0_4GXwmovHyCFK211qLIUnlwWGgK.CuLX4Cha3B1hbUgb7 UnWrpLvW_8XQ_r8lW9NGzwDq8UhHAbBzy5yu0ySuJFLeGA3gS8tElY4JpP3rn_pfnLU7w.Z3VxgV UodDf2j1vPauUGJ0aUBtoDy77431eW7_UJyLblJrwKtfjANT8IUsmKpZv54_AuikwsdpbXcEuAM7 P.A_ERi3vDZL0.Q7Q2HPA6gdF1CCjWI2Jhzj.7ZTelxsirJUY_NQ3malZonpMcJrh5FPFAUnQJE2 hy86g7vfPlYUtMGDCzdczKoFU8tIXN7DnoDnKtGoToS32RFJ1TS5LeLv4yTjZh2f2Jusx1WLErxg Ijfk0bERDhtWc84vVZcb1uDdM8i.ufs9vACaxwiPfyOUxrreuwYJFDs3NpIHs0Yi0vVRHWLqmlV7 8zcWdGs54ysjG8t6veJbV6yynsD.s57so50Igk0RdGSClEh_Mb5PiXXDiFAVoFgE5T8SQ8pM82.w 6tIVz5hIET7rYTL42qb2lbMI7kGXKSuO.zcqVHzZEKR_UJIpR71jYV9sfEBAVVCyii9Zhk9bNRgV AgePI5P6aD7B01u.yiBGXvgpZH_6Hb5OtQ6fcA7lWbqpT9DC.3XngCFrvfbFBODhO.c.RUfvhH9R Nj7._yD30uEuUI39fOt4zzQbh8AXAhTVTJsu21E26r8G9_OI_K8XRj2z0Nj5OYse0qPuie6WUHkL BSxQW9SH7eXKT94tl4jxA0he5GLkEhowcIj4oUvqO2BE23a5wWwShwsPwgmnKwPg5IfRgFl2cReX DKWgdqVB_YX0oM2qEbbPv2JTrR1KqYBUFL31rEU_unfx6sTyekKFeVzhs0FG0yGlL34CDYUOXrGA Rf7sB3ap2qxtES1zU9Kypef8TNx9H2epBn9LZIKufCZWPRPvsHD8i3qdEE52OO2BKpwSCw_D7pFm mn_Nud7i7FTioTIKlLWPPff0UeeZTH7toPjH9Jwe0NPwuQXg2a_BKXuH3cIxpPW7C16YncQt1i5K 0AvdSvFpAIsz.9XrtAVfqxHhWNVN7ZWNBD3vcOWXnsOwRHAzZXzE70zA- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic317.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:31:37 +0000 Received: by smtp423.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 80af1f7df6ec7b1180c84c54494b7bc1; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:31:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v21 11/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:19:12 -0700 Message-Id: <20201012201924.71463-12-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20201012201924.71463-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20201012201924.71463-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy() call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: John Johansen Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 11 +++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 10 ++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 6 ++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 35 +++++++++++---------------- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 16 ++++++------ 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index d7fe1d5ee8c9..81b00d07490f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS */ /* LIM API function definitions */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, @@ -280,8 +280,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring); void ima_init_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 4f39fb93f278..e83fa1c32843 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy. * @inode: pointer to the inode associated with the object being validated * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -183,16 +183,16 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask. * */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, + return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc, keyring); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index a782d8094984..5d821527d7e9 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func) return 0; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding the .secid[0] */ - return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], func, - mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, - NULL); + return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &blob, func, mask, + IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL); } static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 97b26c425ac5..4031590b91a6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr, + action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc, NULL); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -386,8 +386,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -426,8 +425,7 @@ int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot) security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file); - /* scaffolding */ - action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], 0, + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), &blob, 0, MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, 0); /* Is the mmap'ed file in policy? */ @@ -466,16 +464,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -493,8 +489,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -675,9 +670,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -775,9 +769,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, */ if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - 0, func, &pcr, &template, keyring); + action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), &blob, 0, func, + &pcr, &template, keyring); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 8218f68e7b96..0dd5730b265d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * @rule: a pointer to a rule * @inode: a pointer to an inode * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation - * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: the lsm data of the task to be validated * @func: LIM hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @keyring: keyring name to check in policy for KEY_CHECK func @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, const char *keyring) { @@ -519,8 +519,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, secid); - rc = ima_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata, rule->lsm[i].type, + rc = ima_filter_rule_match(blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, rule->lsm[i].rules); default: @@ -562,7 +561,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -577,8 +576,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *keyring) { @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask, + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, blob, func, mask, keyring)) continue;