diff mbox series

[-next] tpm: ibmvtpm: Correct the return value in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()

Message ID 20220318060201.50488-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [-next] tpm: ibmvtpm: Correct the return value in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() | expand

Commit Message

xiujianfeng March 18, 2022, 6:02 a.m. UTC
Currently it returns zero when CRQ response timed out, it should return
an error code instead.

Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Stefan Berger March 18, 2022, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On 3/18/22 02:02, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> Currently it returns zero when CRQ response timed out, it should return
> an error code instead.
> 
> Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index 3af4c07a9342..d3989b257f42 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
>   	if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq,
>   				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
>   				HZ)) {
> +		rc = -ENODEV;
>   		dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
>   		goto init_irq_cleanup;
>   	}
Jarkko Sakkinen March 20, 2022, 9:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 02:02:01PM +0800, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> Currently it returns zero when CRQ response timed out, it should return
> an error code instead.
> 
> Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index 3af4c07a9342..d3989b257f42 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
>  	if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq,
>  				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
>  				HZ)) {
> +		rc = -ENODEV;
>  		dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
>  		goto init_irq_cleanup;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

This will require reviewed by from someone who knows this driver
better.

BR, Jarkko
Jarkko Sakkinen March 20, 2022, 9:23 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 09:54:46AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/18/22 02:02, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> > Currently it returns zero when CRQ response timed out, it should return
> > an error code instead.
> > 
> > Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you, I applied this.

BR, Jarkko
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 3af4c07a9342..d3989b257f42 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -681,6 +681,7 @@  static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
 	if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq,
 				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
 				HZ)) {
+		rc = -ENODEV;
 		dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
 		goto init_irq_cleanup;
 	}