From patchwork Tue Jan 2 17:04:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 13509204 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [96.44.175.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7292F15491; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="cQrdOwxz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1704215769; bh=IXTaYPhs+Z47ZssITLiRDv+1XDVv5UgqtsfBBLD02kI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cQrdOwxzULmhwGE59v8s103OrFtgumr0KGZzAzrtou5aBAmFnVmw/pZpUPKqqs58F R8f+XuXgMglkYG1lsdBwZQesIzXQ+jyNLjd4p21cumSMvij8LUL0a5DbmB9Up7+Dbj 3wyY51H+y5og8RnY3QIZIO62CHHet5V42ZAQwewI= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6103C12868A4; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:16:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3m-peuLcmc5V; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:16:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from lingrow.int.hansenpartnership.com (unknown [153.66.160.227]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873171286695; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:16:08 -0500 (EST) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [PATCH v6 18/20] KEYS: trusted: Add session encryption protection to the seal/unseal path Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:04:06 -0500 Message-Id: <20240102170408.21969-19-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20240102170408.21969-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20240102170408.21969-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 If some entity is snooping the TPM bus, the can see the data going in to be sealed and the data coming out as it is unsealed. Add parameter and response encryption to these cases to ensure that no secrets are leaked even if the bus is snooped. As part of doing this conversion it was discovered that policy sessions can't work with HMAC protected authority because of missing pieces (the tpm Nonce). I've added code to work the same way as before, which will result in potential authority exposure (while still adding security for the command and the returned blob), and a fixme to redo the API to get rid of this security hole. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- v2: fix unseal with policy and password v3: fix session memory leak --- security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index 97b1dfca2dba..dfeec06301ce 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -253,26 +253,26 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, if (rc) return rc; + rc = tpm2_start_auth_session(chip); + if (rc) + goto out_put; + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_CREATE); if (rc) { - tpm_put_ops(chip); - return rc; + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); + goto out_put; } rc = tpm_buf_init_sized(&sized); if (rc) { tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); - tpm_put_ops(chip); - return rc; + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); + goto out_put; } - tpm_buf_reset(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_CREATE); - tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, options->keyhandle); - tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, TPM2_RS_PW, - NULL /* nonce */, 0, - 0 /* session_attributes */, - options->keyauth /* hmac */, - TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); + tpm_buf_append_name(chip, &buf, options->keyhandle, NULL); + tpm_buf_append_hmac_session(chip, &buf, TPM2_SA_DECRYPT, + options->keyauth, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); /* sensitive */ tpm_buf_append_u16(&sized, options->blobauth_len); @@ -314,10 +314,13 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, if (buf.flags & TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW) { rc = -E2BIG; + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); goto out; } + tpm_buf_fill_hmac_session(chip, &buf); rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 4, "sealing data"); + rc = tpm_buf_check_hmac_response(chip, &buf, rc); if (rc) goto out; @@ -348,6 +351,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, else payload->blob_len = blob_len; +out_put: tpm_put_ops(chip); return rc; } @@ -417,25 +421,31 @@ static int tpm2_load_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, if (blob_len > payload->blob_len) return -E2BIG; - rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_LOAD); + rc = tpm2_start_auth_session(chip); if (rc) return rc; - tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, options->keyhandle); - tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, TPM2_RS_PW, - NULL /* nonce */, 0, - 0 /* session_attributes */, - options->keyauth /* hmac */, - TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_LOAD); + if (rc) { + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); + return rc; + } + + tpm_buf_append_name(chip, &buf, options->keyhandle, NULL); + tpm_buf_append_hmac_session(chip, &buf, 0, options->keyauth, + TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); tpm_buf_append(&buf, blob, blob_len); if (buf.flags & TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW) { rc = -E2BIG; + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); goto out; } + tpm_buf_fill_hmac_session(chip, &buf); rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 4, "loading blob"); + rc = tpm_buf_check_hmac_response(chip, &buf, rc); if (!rc) *blob_handle = be32_to_cpup( (__be32 *) &buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE]); @@ -473,20 +483,44 @@ static int tpm2_unseal_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *data; int rc; - rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_UNSEAL); + rc = tpm2_start_auth_session(chip); if (rc) return rc; - tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, blob_handle); - tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, - options->policyhandle ? - options->policyhandle : TPM2_RS_PW, - NULL /* nonce */, 0, - TPM2_SA_CONTINUE_SESSION, - options->blobauth /* hmac */, - options->blobauth_len); + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_UNSEAL); + if (rc) { + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); + return rc; + } + + tpm_buf_append_name(chip, &buf, blob_handle, NULL); + + if (!options->policyhandle) { + tpm_buf_append_hmac_session(chip, &buf, TPM2_SA_ENCRYPT, + options->blobauth, + options->blobauth_len); + } else { + /* + * FIXME: The policy session was generated outside the + * kernel so we don't known the nonce and thus can't + * calculate a HMAC on it. Therefore, the user can + * only really use TPM2_PolicyPassword and we must + * send down the plain text password, which could be + * intercepted. We can still encrypt the returned + * key, but that's small comfort since the interposer + * could repeat our actions with the exfiltrated + * password. + */ + tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, options->policyhandle, + NULL /* nonce */, 0, 0, + options->blobauth, options->blobauth_len); + tpm_buf_append_hmac_session_opt(chip, &buf, TPM2_SA_ENCRYPT, + NULL, 0); + } + tpm_buf_fill_hmac_session(chip, &buf); rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 6, "unsealing"); + rc = tpm_buf_check_hmac_response(chip, &buf, rc); if (rc > 0) rc = -EPERM;