diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,3/4] tsm: Map RTMRs to TCG TPM PCRs

Message ID 20240128212532.2754325-4-sameo@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series tsm: Runtime measurement registers ABI | expand

Commit Message

Samuel Ortiz Jan. 28, 2024, 9:25 p.m. UTC
Many user space and internal kernel subsystems (e.g. the Linux IMA)
expect a Root of Trust for Storage (RTS) that allows for extending
and reading measurement registers that are compatible with the TCG TPM
PCRs layout, e.g. a TPM. In order to allow those components to
alternatively use a platform TSM as their RTS, a TVM could map the
available RTMRs to one or more TCG TPM PCRs. Once configured, those PCR
to RTMR mappings give the kernel TSM layer all the necessary information
to be a RTS for e.g. the Linux IMA or any other components that expects
a TCG compliant TPM PCRs layout.

TPM PCR mappings are statically configured through the TSM provider
capabilities. A TSM backend defines its number of RTMRs, and for each
one of them can define a bitmask of TCG TPM PCR it maps to. As they are
TSM backend specific, those mappings are to some extend architecture
specific. Each architecture is free to decide and choose how it builds
it, e.g. by requesting an EFI firmware when it supports the EFI_CC
protocol.

The tsm-configfs rtmrs/<rtmrN>tcg_map describes these static mappings.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm | 14 +++++
 drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c                | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)

Comments

Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Jan. 28, 2024, 10:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/28/24 1:25 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Many user space and internal kernel subsystems (e.g. the Linux IMA)
> expect a Root of Trust for Storage (RTS) that allows for extending
> and reading measurement registers that are compatible with the TCG TPM
> PCRs layout, e.g. a TPM. In order to allow those components to
> alternatively use a platform TSM as their RTS, a TVM could map the
> available RTMRs to one or more TCG TPM PCRs. Once configured, those PCR
> to RTMR mappings give the kernel TSM layer all the necessary information
> to be a RTS for e.g. the Linux IMA or any other components that expects
> a TCG compliant TPM PCRs layout.

Why expose the mapping to user space? IMO, the goal should be
to let user space application work without any changes. So we should
try to hide this conversion in kernel and let userspace code to use
PCR as usual.

>
> TPM PCR mappings are statically configured through the TSM provider
> capabilities. A TSM backend defines its number of RTMRs, and for each
> one of them can define a bitmask of TCG TPM PCR it maps to. As they are
> TSM backend specific, those mappings are to some extend architecture
> specific. Each architecture is free to decide and choose how it builds
> it, e.g. by requesting an EFI firmware when it supports the EFI_CC
> protocol.
>
> The tsm-configfs rtmrs/<rtmrN>tcg_map describes these static mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm | 14 +++++
>  drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c                | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> index 590e103a9bcd..5d20a872475e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> @@ -91,3 +91,17 @@ Description:
>                  can be mapped to a hardware RTMR by writing into its index
>                  attribute. The TSM provider will then map the configfs entry to
>                  its corresponding hardware register.
> +
> +What:		/sys/kernel/config/tsm/rtmrs/$name/tcg_map
> +Date:		January, 2024
> +KernelVersion:	v6.8
> +Contact:	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
> +Description:
> +		(RO) A representation of the architecturally defined mapping
> +		between this RTMR and one or more TCG TPM PCRs [1]. When using
> +		a TSM as Root of Trust for Storage (RTS), TCG TPM PCRs
> +		associated semantics and indexes can be used when RTMRs are
> +		logically mapped to TPM PCRs.
> +
> +		[1]: TCG PC Client Specific Platform Firmware Profile Specification
> +		https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/pc-client-specific-platform-firmware-profile-specification/
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> index bb9ed2d2accc..d03cf5173bc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,46 @@ static const struct config_item_type tsm_reports_type = {
>  	.ct_group_ops = &tsm_report_group_ops,
>  };
>  
> +static int tsm_rtmr_build_tcg_map(const struct tsm_provider *tsm,
> +				const struct tsm_rtmr_state *rtmr_state,
> +				u32 rtmr_idx)
> +{
> +	const struct tsm_ops *ops;
> +	unsigned long pcr_mask;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&tsm_rwsem);
> +
> +	ops = tsm->ops;
> +	if (!ops)
> +		return -ENOTTY;
> +
> +	if (!ops->capabilities.rtmrs)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	pcr_mask = ops->capabilities.rtmrs[rtmr_idx].tcg_pcr_mask;
> +
> +	/* Check that the PCR mask is valid  */
> +	for (i = 0; i < TPM2_PLATFORM_PCR; i++) {
> +		if (!(pcr_mask & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* If another RTMR maps to this PCR, the mask is discarded */
> +		if (tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] &&
> +			tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] != rtmr_state)
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < TPM2_PLATFORM_PCR; i++) {
> +		if (!(pcr_mask & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] = rtmr_state;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_store(struct config_item *cfg,
>  				    const char *buf, size_t len)
>  {
> @@ -449,6 +489,10 @@ static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_store(struct config_item *cfg,
>  	if (tsm_rtmrs->rtmrs[val])
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	rc = tsm_rtmr_build_tcg_map(&provider, rtmr_state, val);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
>  	rtmr_state->index = val;
>  	rtmr_state->alg = ops->capabilities.rtmrs[val].hash_alg;
>  
> @@ -472,8 +516,38 @@ static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_show(struct config_item *cfg,
>  }
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR(tsm_rtmr_, index);
>  
> +static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_tcg_map_show(struct config_item *cfg,
> +				     char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct tsm_rtmr_state *rtmr_state = to_tsm_rtmr_state(cfg);
> +	unsigned int nr_pcrs = ARRAY_SIZE(tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map), i;
> +	unsigned long *pcr_mask;
> +	ssize_t len;
> +
> +	/* Build a bitmap mask of all PCRs that this RTMR covers */
> +	pcr_mask = bitmap_zalloc(nr_pcrs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pcr_mask)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	guard(rwsem_read)(&tsm_rwsem);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_pcrs; i++) {
> +		if (tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] != rtmr_state)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		__set_bit(i, pcr_mask);
> +	}
> +
> +	len = bitmap_print_list_to_buf(buf, pcr_mask, nr_pcrs, 0,
> +				       nr_pcrs * 3 /* 2 ASCII digits and one comma */);
> +	bitmap_free(pcr_mask);
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(tsm_rtmr_, tcg_map);
> +
>  static struct configfs_attribute *tsm_rtmr_attrs[] = {
>  	&tsm_rtmr_attr_index,
> +	&tsm_rtmr_attr_tcg_map,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>
James Bottomley Feb. 2, 2024, 6:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 14:44 -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> 
> On 1/28/24 1:25 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Many user space and internal kernel subsystems (e.g. the Linux IMA)
> > expect a Root of Trust for Storage (RTS) that allows for extending
> > and reading measurement registers that are compatible with the TCG
> > TPM PCRs layout, e.g. a TPM. In order to allow those components to
> > alternatively use a platform TSM as their RTS, a TVM could map the
> > available RTMRs to one or more TCG TPM PCRs. Once configured, those
> > PCR to RTMR mappings give the kernel TSM layer all the necessary
> > information to be a RTS for e.g. the Linux IMA or any other
> > components that expects a TCG compliant TPM PCRs layout.
> 
> Why expose the mapping to user space? IMO, the goal should be
> to let user space application work without any changes. So we should
> try to hide this conversion in kernel and let userspace code to use
> PCR as usual.

There's also the question about use case: if we're going to measure
into RTMRs as though they were PCRs, they will need to collect the
kernel measurements as well, which means the mapping will have to be
fixed in early boot when the first TPM measurement is done.

James
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
index 590e103a9bcd..5d20a872475e 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
@@ -91,3 +91,17 @@  Description:
                 can be mapped to a hardware RTMR by writing into its index
                 attribute. The TSM provider will then map the configfs entry to
                 its corresponding hardware register.
+
+What:		/sys/kernel/config/tsm/rtmrs/$name/tcg_map
+Date:		January, 2024
+KernelVersion:	v6.8
+Contact:	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
+Description:
+		(RO) A representation of the architecturally defined mapping
+		between this RTMR and one or more TCG TPM PCRs [1]. When using
+		a TSM as Root of Trust for Storage (RTS), TCG TPM PCRs
+		associated semantics and indexes can be used when RTMRs are
+		logically mapped to TPM PCRs.
+
+		[1]: TCG PC Client Specific Platform Firmware Profile Specification
+		https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/pc-client-specific-platform-firmware-profile-specification/
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
index bb9ed2d2accc..d03cf5173bc9 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
@@ -419,6 +419,46 @@  static const struct config_item_type tsm_reports_type = {
 	.ct_group_ops = &tsm_report_group_ops,
 };
 
+static int tsm_rtmr_build_tcg_map(const struct tsm_provider *tsm,
+				const struct tsm_rtmr_state *rtmr_state,
+				u32 rtmr_idx)
+{
+	const struct tsm_ops *ops;
+	unsigned long pcr_mask;
+	int i;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&tsm_rwsem);
+
+	ops = tsm->ops;
+	if (!ops)
+		return -ENOTTY;
+
+	if (!ops->capabilities.rtmrs)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	pcr_mask = ops->capabilities.rtmrs[rtmr_idx].tcg_pcr_mask;
+
+	/* Check that the PCR mask is valid  */
+	for (i = 0; i < TPM2_PLATFORM_PCR; i++) {
+		if (!(pcr_mask & BIT(i)))
+			continue;
+
+		/* If another RTMR maps to this PCR, the mask is discarded */
+		if (tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] &&
+			tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] != rtmr_state)
+			return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TPM2_PLATFORM_PCR; i++) {
+		if (!(pcr_mask & BIT(i)))
+			continue;
+
+		tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] = rtmr_state;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_store(struct config_item *cfg,
 				    const char *buf, size_t len)
 {
@@ -449,6 +489,10 @@  static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_store(struct config_item *cfg,
 	if (tsm_rtmrs->rtmrs[val])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	rc = tsm_rtmr_build_tcg_map(&provider, rtmr_state, val);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
 	rtmr_state->index = val;
 	rtmr_state->alg = ops->capabilities.rtmrs[val].hash_alg;
 
@@ -472,8 +516,38 @@  static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_index_show(struct config_item *cfg,
 }
 CONFIGFS_ATTR(tsm_rtmr_, index);
 
+static ssize_t tsm_rtmr_tcg_map_show(struct config_item *cfg,
+				     char *buf)
+{
+	struct tsm_rtmr_state *rtmr_state = to_tsm_rtmr_state(cfg);
+	unsigned int nr_pcrs = ARRAY_SIZE(tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map), i;
+	unsigned long *pcr_mask;
+	ssize_t len;
+
+	/* Build a bitmap mask of all PCRs that this RTMR covers */
+	pcr_mask = bitmap_zalloc(nr_pcrs, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pcr_mask)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	guard(rwsem_read)(&tsm_rwsem);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_pcrs; i++) {
+		if (tsm_rtmrs->tcg_map[i] != rtmr_state)
+			continue;
+
+		__set_bit(i, pcr_mask);
+	}
+
+	len = bitmap_print_list_to_buf(buf, pcr_mask, nr_pcrs, 0,
+				       nr_pcrs * 3 /* 2 ASCII digits and one comma */);
+	bitmap_free(pcr_mask);
+
+	return len;
+}
+CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(tsm_rtmr_, tcg_map);
+
 static struct configfs_attribute *tsm_rtmr_attrs[] = {
 	&tsm_rtmr_attr_index,
+	&tsm_rtmr_attr_tcg_map,
 	NULL,
 };