| Message ID | 20240131104851.2311358-4-john.g.garry@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce uts_release | expand |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 +0000 John Garry wrote: > Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't > need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing. > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Yes, please! Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
On 31/01/2024 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 +0000 John Garry wrote: >> Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't >> need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing. >> >> Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.g.garry@oracle.com> > Yes, please! > > Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski<kuba@kernel.org> Cheers BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok: --------8<--------- net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version The version is same as the default, as don't bother. Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team.c b/drivers/net/team/team.c index f575f225d417..0a44bbdcfb7b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/team/team.c +++ b/drivers/net/team/team.c @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ #include <net/genetlink.h> #include <net/netlink.h> #include <net/sch_generic.h> -#include <generated/utsrelease.h> #include <linux/if_team.h> #define DRV_NAME "team" @@ -2074,7 +2073,6 @@ static void team_ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *drvinfo) { strscpy(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(drvinfo->driver)); - strscpy(drvinfo->version, UTS_RELEASE, sizeof(drvinfo->version)); } -------->8--------- right? John
Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 01:57:16PM CET, john.g.garry@oracle.com wrote: >On 31/01/2024 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 +0000 John Garry wrote: >> > Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't >> > need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.g.garry@oracle.com> >> Yes, please! >> >> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski<kuba@kernel.org> > >Cheers > >BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok: > >--------8<--------- > > net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version > > The version is same as the default, as don't bother. > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> > >diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team.c b/drivers/net/team/team.c >index f575f225d417..0a44bbdcfb7b 100644 >--- a/drivers/net/team/team.c >+++ b/drivers/net/team/team.c >@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ >#include <net/genetlink.h> >#include <net/netlink.h> >#include <net/sch_generic.h> >-#include <generated/utsrelease.h> >#include <linux/if_team.h> > >#define DRV_NAME "team" >@@ -2074,7 +2073,6 @@ static void team_ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct >net_device *dev, > struct ethtool_drvinfo *drvinfo) >{ > strscpy(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(drvinfo->driver)); >- strscpy(drvinfo->version, UTS_RELEASE, sizeof(drvinfo->version)); Yeah. I don't see why should anyone care about this "version"... Let's remove it. >} > >-------->8--------- > >right? > >John > > > > >
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:20:23 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote: > >BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok: > > > >--------8<--------- > > > > net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version Yup, just to be clear - you can send this independently from the series, tag is as [PATCH net-next] we'll take it via the networking tree. I'm not sure which tree the other patches will go thru..
On 01/02/2024 16:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:20:23 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok: >>> >>> --------8<--------- >>> >>> net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version > > Yup, just to be clear - you can send this independently from the series, Sure, and I think rocker and staging/octeon also have this unnecessary code also. > tag is as > > [PATCH net-next] ah, yes > > we'll take it via the networking tree. Thanks. I assume Greg - the staging maintainer - would take the octeon patch. > I'm not sure which tree the other > patches will go thru.. I think that the best thing to do is get a minimal set in for 6.9 and then merge the rest in the next cycle. I've got about 22 patches in total now, but I think that there will be more. We'll see who can pick up the first set when I send it officially. Thanks, John
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c index 7519b0818b91..81d052505f67 100644 --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h> #include <net/flow_offload.h> #include <linux/ethtool_netlink.h> -#include <generated/utsrelease.h> +#include <linux/utsname.h> #include "common.h" /* State held across locks and calls for commands which have devlink fallback */ @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_devlink_compat *rsp) struct device *parent = dev->dev.parent; rsp->info.cmd = ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO; - strscpy(rsp->info.version, UTS_RELEASE, sizeof(rsp->info.version)); + strscpy(rsp->info.version, uts_release, sizeof(rsp->info.version)); if (ops->get_drvinfo) { ops->get_drvinfo(dev, &rsp->info); if (!rsp->info.bus_info[0] && parent)
Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing. Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> --- net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)