| Message ID | 20240404151713.3493098-2-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enable more warnings by default | expand |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > The -Wextra option controls a number of different warnings that differ > slightly by compiler version. Some are useful in general, others are > better left at W=1 or higher. Based on earlier work, the ones that > should be disabled by default are left for the higher warning levels > already, and a lot of the useful ones have no remaining output when > enabled. > > Move the -Wextra option up into the set of default-enabled warnings > and just rely on the individual ones getting disabled as needed. > > The -Wunused warning was always grouped with this, so turn it on > by default as well, except for the -Wunused-parameter warning that > really has no value at all for the kernel since many interfaces > have intentionally unused arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> I have not done any LLVM builds with this change but if this is going to be in -next for a little bit, we should be able to get any regressions handled quickly. I am in favor of more warnings but I am a little nervous this will make compiler upgrades (or tracking their mainline) even more difficult. I do not have a feeling for how often warnings are added to -Wall and -Wextra so this may be unfounded but the kernel's -Werror use complicates this in my opinion. I can engage with the clang folks to try and be given a heads up when a warning is going to be added to -Wextra, it would be good to have someone do something similar for GCC, so that those upgrades do not cause something like this change to be rolled back. It is easy enough to back out of this if necessary though, so: Acked-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > --- > scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn > index c5af566e911a..c247552c192c 100644 > --- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn > @@ -82,12 +82,14 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Werror=designated-init) > # Warn if there is an enum types mismatch > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wenum-conversion) > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wextra > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wunused > + > # > # W=1 - warnings which may be relevant and do not occur too often > # > ifneq ($(findstring 1, $(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN)),) > > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -Wrestrict) > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-format-attribute > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wold-style-definition > @@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ else > > # The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-sign-compare > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-parameter > > endif > > -- > 2.39.2 >
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, at 18:25, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > I have not done any LLVM builds with this change but if this is going to > be in -next for a little bit, we should be able to get any regressions > handled quickly. > > I am in favor of more warnings but I am a little nervous this will make > compiler upgrades (or tracking their mainline) even more difficult. I do > not have a feeling for how often warnings are added to -Wall and -Wextra > so this may be unfounded but the kernel's -Werror use complicates this > in my opinion. I can engage with the clang folks to try and be given a > heads up when a warning is going to be added to -Wextra, it would be > good to have someone do something similar for GCC, so that those > upgrades do not cause something like this change to be rolled back. My impression is that most new warnings get added to -Wall rather than -Wextra anyway. If they are added to -Wextra, it's still easy enough to turn them off individually unless W=1 is set. > It is easy enough to back out of this if necessary though, so: > > Acked-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Thanks! Arnd
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn index c5af566e911a..c247552c192c 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn +++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn @@ -82,12 +82,14 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Werror=designated-init) # Warn if there is an enum types mismatch KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wenum-conversion) +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wextra +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wunused + # # W=1 - warnings which may be relevant and do not occur too often # ifneq ($(findstring 1, $(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN)),) -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -Wrestrict) KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-format-attribute KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wold-style-definition @@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ else # The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-sign-compare +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-parameter endif