Message ID | 20240902160828.1092891-1-ojeda@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] kbuild: pahole-version: improve overall checking and error messages | expand |
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 6:09 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote: > > +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." > + echo >&2 "***" > + exit 1 > +fi We may not want to print a warning in this case if this case/setup is too common, though. Cheers, Miguel
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 06:08:28PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > Like patch "rust: suppress error messages from > CONFIG_{RUSTC,BINDGEN}_VERSION_TEXT" [1], do not assume the file existing > and being executable implies executing it will succeed. > > Instead, bail out if executing it fails for any reason, as well as if > the program does not print to standard output what we are expecting from > `pahole --version`. The script needs to ensure that it always returns > an integer, since its output will go into a Kconfig `int`-type symbol. > > In addition, check whether the program exists first, and provide > error messages for each error condition, similar to how it is done in > e.g. `scripts/rust_is_available.sh`. > > For instance, currently `pahole` may be built for another architecture > or may be a program we do not expect that fails: > > $ echo 'bad' > bad-pahole > $ chmod u+x bad-pahole > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > ./bad-pahole: 1: bad: not found > init/Kconfig:112: syntax error > init/Kconfig:112: invalid statement > > With this applied, we get instead: > > *** > *** Running './bad-pahole' to check the pahole version failed with > *** code 127. pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Similarly, `pahole` currently may be a program that returns successfully, > but that does not print the version that we would expect: > > $ echo 'echo' > bad-pahole > $ chmod u+x bad-pahole > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > init/Kconfig:114: syntax error > init/Kconfig:114: invalid statement > > With this applied, we get instead: > > *** > *** pahole './bad-pahole' returned an unexpected version output. > *** pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Finally, with this applied, if the program does not exist, we get: > > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > *** > *** pahole './bad-pahole' could not be found. pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240727140302.1806011-1-masahiroy@kernel.org/ [1] > Co-developed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> > --- > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240728125527.690726-1-ojeda@kernel.org/ > v2: > > Reworked to catch successful programs that may not output what we expect from > pahole as well as to do the checking step-by-step (for better error messages). > > I didn't change the regular expression to reduce the changes (except adding > `p`) -- it can be improved separately. > > Also, please note that I added Nicolas as co-author since he proposed part of > the solution, but he has not formally signed off yet. thanks, no objections. > scripts/pahole-version.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/pahole-version.sh b/scripts/pahole-version.sh > index f8a32ab93ad1..cdb80a3d6e4f 100755 > --- a/scripts/pahole-version.sh > +++ b/scripts/pahole-version.sh > @@ -5,9 +5,33 @@ > # > # Prints pahole's version in a 3-digit form, such as 119 for v1.19. > > -if [ ! -x "$(command -v "$@")" ]; then > - echo 0 > +set -e > +trap "echo 0; exit 1" EXIT > + > +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." shellcheck likes to have '$*' instead of '$@', but I can't think of a set of arguments which might cause problems. > + echo >&2 "***" > + exit 1 > +fi > + > +output=$("$@" --version 2>/dev/null) || code=$? > +if [ -n "$code" ]; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** Running '$@' to check the pahole version failed with" > + echo >&2 "*** code $code. pahole will not be used." > + echo >&2 "***" > + exit 1 > +fi > + > +output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/p') I'd rather like to have output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9][0-9])/\1\2/p') here (thus, explicitly check against a two number subversion), so that we can detect also versions like 1.100 or 2.1 and bail out. Kind regards, Nicolas
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 6:09 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then > > + echo >&2 "***" > > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." > > + echo >&2 "***" > > + exit 1 > > +fi > > We may not want to print a warning in this case if this case/setup is > too common, though. yes, I think it's a good idea to skip to remove this one. Kind regards, Nicolas
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:49 PM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> wrote: > > thanks, no objections. Thanks for taking a look! > I'd rather like to have > > output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9][0-9])/\1\2/p') > > here (thus, explicitly check against a two number subversion), so that > we can detect also versions like 1.100 or 2.1 and bail out. So I didn't change that here to avoid more changes in the same commit, but happy to do that if preferred. However, do we want to make it too strict? i.e. I don't think it is very unexpected to get v1.100 or v2.1 -- it may not be what current `pahole` does or ever do, but I am not sure we gain much by being so strict. (Similarly, for the ^..$ suggestion, it could be that `pahole` decides to to something like `pahole v1.25`, i.e. `name version`, like other programs). Either way, I am happy -- I doubt `pahole` changes too much, and if it does, we can change this too. Cheers, Miguel
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:09 AM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote: > > Like patch "rust: suppress error messages from > CONFIG_{RUSTC,BINDGEN}_VERSION_TEXT" [1], Better to point the commit instead of the patch in ML. Like commit 5ce86c6c8613 ("rust: suppress error messages from CONFIG_{RUSTC,BINDGEN}_VERSION_TEXT"), > do not assume the file existing > and being executable implies executing it will succeed. > > Instead, bail out if executing it fails for any reason, as well as if > the program does not print to standard output what we are expecting from > `pahole --version`. The script needs to ensure that it always returns > an integer, since its output will go into a Kconfig `int`-type symbol. > > In addition, check whether the program exists first, and provide > error messages for each error condition, similar to how it is done in > e.g. `scripts/rust_is_available.sh`. > > For instance, currently `pahole` may be built for another architecture > or may be a program we do not expect that fails: > > $ echo 'bad' > bad-pahole > $ chmod u+x bad-pahole > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > ./bad-pahole: 1: bad: not found > init/Kconfig:112: syntax error > init/Kconfig:112: invalid statement > > With this applied, we get instead: > > *** > *** Running './bad-pahole' to check the pahole version failed with > *** code 127. pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Similarly, `pahole` currently may be a program that returns successfully, > but that does not print the version that we would expect: > > $ echo 'echo' > bad-pahole > $ chmod u+x bad-pahole > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > init/Kconfig:114: syntax error > init/Kconfig:114: invalid statement > > With this applied, we get instead: > > *** > *** pahole './bad-pahole' returned an unexpected version output. > *** pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Finally, with this applied, if the program does not exist, we get: > > $ make PAHOLE=./bad-pahole defconfig > ... > *** > *** pahole './bad-pahole' could not be found. pahole will not be used. > *** > ... > $ grep CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION .config > CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION=0 > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240727140302.1806011-1-masahiroy@kernel.org/ [1] > Co-developed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> > --- > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240728125527.690726-1-ojeda@kernel.org/ > v2: > > Reworked to catch successful programs that may not output what we expect from > pahole as well as to do the checking step-by-step (for better error messages). > > I didn't change the regular expression to reduce the changes (except adding > `p`) -- it can be improved separately. > > Also, please note that I added Nicolas as co-author since he proposed part of > the solution, but he has not formally signed off yet. > > scripts/pahole-version.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/pahole-version.sh b/scripts/pahole-version.sh > index f8a32ab93ad1..cdb80a3d6e4f 100755 > --- a/scripts/pahole-version.sh > +++ b/scripts/pahole-version.sh > @@ -5,9 +5,33 @@ > # > # Prints pahole's version in a 3-digit form, such as 119 for v1.19. > > -if [ ! -x "$(command -v "$@")" ]; then > - echo 0 > +set -e > +trap "echo 0; exit 1" EXIT > + > +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." > + echo >&2 "***" > + exit 1 > +fi > + > +output=$("$@" --version 2>/dev/null) || code=$? > +if [ -n "$code" ]; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** Running '$@' to check the pahole version failed with" > + echo >&2 "*** code $code. pahole will not be used." > + echo >&2 "***" > + exit 1 > +fi > + > +output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/p') > +if [ -z "${output}" ]; then > + echo >&2 "***" > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' returned an unexpected version output." > + echo >&2 "*** pahole will not be used." > + echo >&2 "***" > exit 1 > fi > > -"$@" --version | sed -E 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/' > +echo "${output}" > +trap EXIT > > base-commit: 431c1646e1f86b949fa3685efc50b660a364c2b6 > -- > 2.46.0
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:13 AM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 6:09 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then > > + echo >&2 "***" > > + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." > > + echo >&2 "***" > > + exit 1 > > +fi > > We may not want to print a warning in this case if this case/setup is > too common, though. I am fine with your color (in case someone wants to run it manually?) as long as stderr is suppressed in Kconfig. default $(shell,$(srctree)/scripts/pahole-version.sh $(PAHOLE) 2>/dev/null) scripts/rust_is_available.sh is very verbose, but we are not annoyed while running Kconfig because the $(success ) macro suppressed stderr.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:15 AM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:49 PM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> wrote: > > > > thanks, no objections. > > Thanks for taking a look! > > > I'd rather like to have > > > > output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9][0-9])/\1\2/p') > > > > here (thus, explicitly check against a two number subversion), so that > > we can detect also versions like 1.100 or 2.1 and bail out. > > So I didn't change that here to avoid more changes in the same commit, > but happy to do that if preferred. > > However, do we want to make it too strict? i.e. I don't think it is > very unexpected to get v1.100 or v2.1 -- it may not be what current > `pahole` does or ever do, but I am not sure we gain much by being so > strict. I am not sure whether pahole never releases v2.0 $ echo v2.0 | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/p' 20 Not a syntax error, but the version comparison will not work correctly. > > (Similarly, for the ^..$ suggestion, it could be that `pahole` decides > to to something like `pahole v1.25`, i.e. `name version`, like other > programs). > > Either way, I am happy -- I doubt `pahole` changes too much, and if it > does, we can change this too. > > Cheers, > Miguel >
diff --git a/scripts/pahole-version.sh b/scripts/pahole-version.sh index f8a32ab93ad1..cdb80a3d6e4f 100755 --- a/scripts/pahole-version.sh +++ b/scripts/pahole-version.sh @@ -5,9 +5,33 @@ # # Prints pahole's version in a 3-digit form, such as 119 for v1.19. -if [ ! -x "$(command -v "$@")" ]; then - echo 0 +set -e +trap "echo 0; exit 1" EXIT + +if ! command -v "$@" >/dev/null; then + echo >&2 "***" + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' could not be found. pahole will not be used." + echo >&2 "***" + exit 1 +fi + +output=$("$@" --version 2>/dev/null) || code=$? +if [ -n "$code" ]; then + echo >&2 "***" + echo >&2 "*** Running '$@' to check the pahole version failed with" + echo >&2 "*** code $code. pahole will not be used." + echo >&2 "***" + exit 1 +fi + +output=$(echo "$output" | sed -nE 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/p') +if [ -z "${output}" ]; then + echo >&2 "***" + echo >&2 "*** pahole '$@' returned an unexpected version output." + echo >&2 "*** pahole will not be used." + echo >&2 "***" exit 1 fi -"$@" --version | sed -E 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/' +echo "${output}" +trap EXIT