Message ID | 20191212022711.10062-1-sjpark@amazon.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix nits in the kunit | expand |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 6:27 PM SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> wrote: > > This patchset contains trivial fixes for the kunit documentations and > the wrapper python scripts. > > > Baseline > -------- > > This patchset is based on 'kselftest/fixes' branch of > linux-kselftest[1]. A complete tree is available at my repo: > https://github.com/sjp38/linux/tree/kunit_fix/20191205_v6 Everything looks good to me. Shuah, feel free to pick this up at your convenience. SeongJae, Thanks for all your hard work on this. I really appreciate it!
On 12/12/19 2:31 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 6:27 PM SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This patchset contains trivial fixes for the kunit documentations and >> the wrapper python scripts. >> >> >> Baseline >> -------- >> >> This patchset is based on 'kselftest/fixes' branch of >> linux-kselftest[1]. A complete tree is available at my repo: >> https://github.com/sjp38/linux/tree/kunit_fix/20191205_v6 > > Everything looks good to me. Shuah, feel free to pick this up at your > convenience. > > SeongJae, Thanks for all your hard work on this. I really appreciate it! > Yup. I will pull these in early next week. thanks, -- Shuah
On 12/11/19 7:27 PM, SeongJae Park wrote: > This patchset contains trivial fixes for the kunit documentations and > the wrapper python scripts. > > > Baseline > -------- > > This patchset is based on 'kselftest/fixes' branch of > linux-kselftest[1]. A complete tree is available at my repo: > https://github.com/sjp38/linux/tree/kunit_fix/20191205_v6 > > > Version History > --------------- > > Changes from v5 > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191205093440.21824-1-sjpark@amazon.com): > - Rebased on kselftest/fixes > - Add 'Reviewed-by' and 'Tested-by' from Brendan Higgins > > Changes from v4 > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1575490683-13015-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com/): > - Rebased on Heidi Fahim's patch[2] > - Fix failing kunit_tool_test test > - Add 'build_dir' option test in 'kunit_tool_test.py' > > Changes from v3 > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191204192141.GA247851@google.com): > - Fix the 4th patch, "kunit: Place 'test.log' under the 'build_dir'" to > set default value of 'build_dir' as '' instead of NULL so that kunit > can run even though '--build_dir' option is not given. > > Changes from v2 > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1575361141-6806-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com): > - Make 'build_dir' if not exists (missed from v3 by mistake) > > Changes from v1 > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1575242724-4937-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com): > - Remove "docs/kunit/start: Skip wrapper run command" (A similar > approach is ongoing) > - Make 'build_dir' if not exists > > SeongJae Park (6): > docs/kunit/start: Use in-tree 'kunit_defconfig' > kunit: Remove duplicated defconfig creation > kunit: Create default config in '--build_dir' > kunit: Place 'test.log' under the 'build_dir' > kunit: Rename 'kunitconfig' to '.kunitconfig' > kunit/kunit_tool_test: Test '--build_dir' option run > > Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 13 +++++-------- > tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 18 +++++++++++------- > tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 10 +++++----- > tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 10 +++++++++- > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > Hi SeongJae Park, Please make sure your From and Signed-off-by addresses match. I tried applying these patches and I am seeing warnings. WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>' thanks, -- Shuah