| Message ID | 20220906151303.2780789-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | bpf-core changes for preparation of | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>: On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:12:56 +0200 you wrote: > Hi, > > well, given that the HID changes haven't moved a lot in the past > revisions and that I am cc-ing a bunch of people, I have dropped them > while we focus on the last 2 requirements in bpf-core changes. > > I'll submit a HID targeted series when we get these in tree, which > would make things a lore more independent. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v11,1/7] selftests/bpf: regroup and declare similar kfuncs selftests in an array https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/012ba1156e4a - [bpf-next,v11,2/7] bpf: split btf_check_subprog_arg_match in two https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/95f2f26f3cac - [bpf-next,v11,3/7] bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/15baa55ff5b0 - [bpf-next,v11,4/7] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fb66223a244f - [bpf-next,v11,5/7] bpf/btf: bump BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f9b348185f4d - [bpf-next,v11,6/7] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/eb1f7f71c126 - [bpf-next,v11,7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/22ed8d5a4652 You are awesome, thank you!
Hi, well, given that the HID changes haven't moved a lot in the past revisions and that I am cc-ing a bunch of people, I have dropped them while we focus on the last 2 requirements in bpf-core changes. I'll submit a HID targeted series when we get these in tree, which would make things a lore more independent. For reference, the whole reasons for these 2 main changes are at https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902132938.2409206-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com/ Compared to v10 (in addition of dropping the HID changes), I have changed the selftests so we can test both light skeletons and libbbpf calls. Cheers, Benjamin Benjamin Tissoires (7): selftests/bpf: regroup and declare similar kfuncs selftests in an array bpf: split btf_check_subprog_arg_match in two bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type bpf/btf: bump BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 + include/linux/btf.h | 10 + kernel/bpf/btf.c | 149 ++++++++++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 66 +++-- net/bpf/test_run.c | 37 +++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 5 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c | 160 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 71 ++++++ 10 files changed, 678 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c