From patchwork Fri Sep 22 07:10:16 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13395069 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BF5E7D0D2 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230332AbjIVHLI (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46264 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230253AbjIVHLG (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:06 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F75C192 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RsNfS3BFjzrT09; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:08:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:57 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] kunit: Fix some bugs in kunit Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:16 +0800 Message-ID: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org The test_cases is not freed in kunit_free_suite_set(). And the copy pointer may be moved in kunit_filter_suites(). The filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases allocated in the last kunit_filter_attr_tests() in last inner for loop may be leaked if kunit_filter_suites() fails. If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed. Changes in v3: - Update the kfree_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() for 4th patch. - Update the commit message for the 4th patch. Changes in v2: - Add Reviewed-by. - Add the memory leak backtrace for the 4th patch. - Remove the unused func kernel test robot noticed for the 4th patch. - Update the commit message for the 4th patch. Jinjie Ruan (4): kunit: Fix missed memory release in kunit_free_suite_set() kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites() kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites() kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test lib/kunit/executor.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)