From patchwork Wed Aug 14 07:14:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13762910 Received: from mail-oa1-f47.google.com (mail-oa1-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC0A139D12 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 07:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.47 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723619673; cv=none; b=RoQvfafHzMwOJcqFe6cQrSyBROKXuhCLvEazB+XHSl90dlGXz2zLILWy6/jO0MXFWkk6KhpLs3DrP1IcNGIID62KnAQIZItLfjsW569FXJ1ElnwXOolDuofwfj/7Gk7ZP+ipxtDTfeDFCdLSgzE1UYRwkSvIDc31NQGegitl+Ls= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723619673; c=relaxed/simple; bh=brPAjMdAxyVmTtvLRIgAXuSdAuoKek9fo+ninmBAJ3s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=BVxnOKbTuGVvOlsOsXsa2TfWUAV9cIlHwREvnMyPSf0S/a3C5R/91CCKJBdRVQ4jKpb0g2SLJzeKHL2AX9jqiM1yu5pOmrUm9R71qAVmuuUHqIPtFKwogerfJheplp0vfWYlYl1S79DaV8/PlBZwuyJ7VlopH8pQSf44dAM4Wqs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=mM4rHg8L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="mM4rHg8L" Received: by mail-oa1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-260e12aac26so3758364fac.0 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:14:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1723619670; x=1724224470; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VwReknVIrDSfw0EPNLA7Z9rOAS1qkGFQa9Wg0CMwvkc=; b=mM4rHg8LBJJ0dGlbU3RSKAYUnHCOdik2y0Z6E3RYL0yuzsIV/A+db3cruBzjJPzVPS tMv+jQdlxhxvmHKbjcSjbsfXkw0pdHOrJnjNyKw/6pYHQJnukWVIsdJAOeqrMooPemXZ GdUmJgqRkQddJ0O0bw0b2KAi2+gqpGNQAZs2s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723619670; x=1724224470; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=VwReknVIrDSfw0EPNLA7Z9rOAS1qkGFQa9Wg0CMwvkc=; b=O7exI9NK0+y9X9D52aUMTlnLuCQfwwLwGV+lVEu0V1Uj9Is35FbQ+CwyeoO3YaVNcy Cg5m9judKRrwc+qA5OgKcWeV3Z4SbwDqaawmRTceLQotMt0U/k17twZeZ245FlL2YdfA wiosIj4fCypCwajCnUb7Xj2RydMAIgGkEDhV0DLuLFYzFC2NmUFwTMLqJMniZGRALq3y foSj2/rYTYHwtr/UUHtineJR9R9Si0DcztMvcA/d/IsgMrqVADocArFqpi6P9qWTxvQs Sh3B9s54lszFdX69RiCTKCVsvs0PIwDoD41ObZ+MkWOGHQmxknTz0nxOEJOHtWXeCuzM E/JQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUpU+bbj3O6YCav+GECxXHEBo2FfFcUndGKBTYYu2X2wfgpF2tUnMOXOzOxuz5pu/gATm0OKz89wvJbzsi1GC2AN82ic3N8Yhgl1uEhzL87 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywe6WoqN26CSSgsyi4fMzIlVfFGe4GVIo+Rg3Lo5rI/d9x0TzS/ yCYBESoIA/ovFovNQQNWc2HvrloLV+ufjK9qS6rkqCiMy+JKcxBlIo1OfpXlvw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHYwRGCLISGoy8hJhOKkAgqX6DtlBOZAVZZqhX4BMHm8h57bmHw97vihcaDfkE2jw2NCAP0Jw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:3508:b0:268:9642:aa08 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-26fe59da324mr1981775fac.10.1723619670385; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (150.12.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.12.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-710e5873ad4sm6962870b3a.15.2024.08.14.00.14.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:14:29 -0700 (PDT) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, pedro.falcato@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, jeffxu@google.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, oliver.sang@intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz, keescook@chromium.org, Jeff Xu Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] mremap refactor: check src address for vma boundaries first. Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 07:14:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20240814071424.2655666-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jeff Xu mremap doesn't allow relocate, expand, shrink across VMA boundaries, refactor the code to check src address range before doing anything on the destination, i.e. destination won't be unmapped, if src address failed the boundaries check. This also allows us to remove can_modify_mm from mremap.c, since the src address must be single VMA, can_modify_vma is used. It is likely this will improve the performance on mremap, previously the code does sealing check using can_modify_mm for the src address range, and the new code removed the loop (used by can_modify_mm). In order to verify this patch doesn't regress on mremap, I added tests in mseal_test, the test patch can be applied before mremap refactor patch or checkin independently. Also this patch doesn't change mseal's existing schematic: if sealing fail, user can expect the src/dst address isn't updated. So this patch can be applied regardless if we decided to go with current out-of-loop approach or in-loop approach currently in discussion. Regarding the perf test report by stress-ng [1] title: 8be7258aad: stress-ng.pagemove.page_remaps_per_sec -4.4% regression The test is using below for testing: stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics --no-rand-seed --pagemove 64 I can't repro this using ChromeOS, the pagemove test shows large value of stddev and stderr, and can't reasonably refect the performance impact. For example: I write a c program [2] to run the above pagemove test 10 times and calculate the stddev, stderr, for 3 commits: 1> before mseal feature is added: Ops/sec: Mean : 3564.40 Std Dev : 2737.35 (76.80% of Mean) Std Err : 865.63 (24.29% of Mean) 2> after mseal feature is added: Ops/sec: Mean : 2703.84 Std Dev : 2085.13 (77.12% of Mean) Std Err : 659.38 (24.39% of Mean) 3> after current patch (mremap refactor) Ops/sec: Mean : 3603.67 Std Dev : 2422.22 (67.22% of Mean) Std Err : 765.97 (21.26% of Mean) The result shows 21%-24% stderr, this means whatever perf improvment/impact there might be won't be measured correctly by this test. This test machine has 32G memory, Intel(R) Celeron(R) 7305, 5 CPU. And I reboot the machine before each test, and take the first 10 runs with run_stress_ng 10 (I will run longer duration to see if test still shows large stdDev,StdErr) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202408041602.caa0372-oliver.sang@intel.com/ [2] https://github.com/peaktocreek/mmperf/blob/main/run_stress_ng.c Jeff Xu (2): mseal:selftest mremap across VMA boundaries. mseal: refactor mremap to remove can_modify_mm mm/internal.h | 24 ++ mm/mremap.c | 77 +++---- mm/mseal.c | 17 -- tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c | 293 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 353 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)