diff mbox series

lib: kunit: Fix compilation test when using TEST_BIT_FIELD_COMPILE

Message ID 20201015120851.229242-1-vitor@massaru.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 294a7f1613ee49a608361bd319519561c0ca7e72
Headers show
Series lib: kunit: Fix compilation test when using TEST_BIT_FIELD_COMPILE | expand

Commit Message

Vitor Massaru Iha Oct. 15, 2020, 12:08 p.m. UTC
A build condition was missing around a compilation test, this compilation
test comes from the original test_bitfield code.

And removed unnecessary code for this test.

Fixes: d2585f5164c2 ("lib: kunit: add bitfield test conversion to KUnit")
Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20201015163056.56fcc835@canb.auug.org.au/
---
 lib/bitfield_kunit.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


base-commit: d2585f5164c298aaaed14c2c8d313cbe7bd5b253

Comments

Brendan Higgins Oct. 16, 2020, 6:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:08 AM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> wrote:
>
> A build condition was missing around a compilation test, this compilation
> test comes from the original test_bitfield code.
>
> And removed unnecessary code for this test.
>
> Fixes: d2585f5164c2 ("lib: kunit: add bitfield test conversion to KUnit")
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20201015163056.56fcc835@canb.auug.org.au/

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

Thanks for taking care of this so quickly!
Shuah Khan Oct. 16, 2020, 7:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/16/20 12:42 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:08 AM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> wrote:
>>
>> A build condition was missing around a compilation test, this compilation
>> test comes from the original test_bitfield code.
>>
>> And removed unnecessary code for this test.
>>
>> Fixes: d2585f5164c2 ("lib: kunit: add bitfield test conversion to KUnit")
>> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20201015163056.56fcc835@canb.auug.org.au/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> 
> Thanks for taking care of this so quickly!
> 

Thank you both.

Applied to linux-kselftest kunit branch
I will send the pull request with this in a day or two.

Added Reported-by for Stephen. Thanks for finding the problem.

thanks,
-- Shuah
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/bitfield_kunit.c b/lib/bitfield_kunit.c
index d63a2be5aff8..1473d8b4bf0f 100644
--- a/lib/bitfield_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/bitfield_kunit.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@  static void __init test_bitfields_variables(struct kunit *context)
 	CHECK(u64, 0x0000001f8000000ull);
 }
 
-
+#ifdef TEST_BITFIELD_COMPILE
 static void __init test_bitfields_compile(struct kunit *context)
 {
 	/* these should fail compilation */
@@ -135,13 +135,11 @@  static void __init test_bitfields_compile(struct kunit *context)
 	/* this should at least give a warning */
 	u16_encode_bits(0, 0x60000);
 }
+#endif
 
 static struct kunit_case __refdata bitfields_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_bitfields_constants),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_bitfields_variables),
-#ifdef TEST_BITFIELD_COMPILE
-	KUNIT_CASE(test_bitfields_compile),
-#endif
 	{}
 };