From patchwork Mon Apr 25 10:01:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch X-Patchwork-Id: 12825541 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9FC433F5 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241057AbiDYKFK (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:05:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239187AbiDYKFH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:05:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759891CB2A; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 23P7QCLO025750; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:59 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=qevLnLIOvhhbayXaWXIfbnUI5mDlCrzfPutLUoLwDtY=; b=rDohz94F4uxNz4BbHp9s0BfFqgM3wOSdDuyuU3+C67s95I5jHMjeC94q/ZlIbdUL8Bsx QL3XTq8tN4uJE68nVGz7ioQzHNSRuhn6oGRdzM4302G/Y4i4AVIMlAhta6x8j042CUAY m/I24fzh9stUZCf3NQ59Vqo6C9MOR6zxDVtKA2OVkFgze/93C4ON5xpL9wSlC5QpWrj/ OPeJLd9b0C03H36KOgVBctO35DEYIcsBmNoCPqIbinB4/TDtjcvpNFSmXvqekGPxau/7 V37Z2lEVPACzWFjGQ1Wjzem+1VuPy1dUJxzN13vK/fqzhSmfvyhxruDQPKnlPFQwuH27 3w== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fnq8k34e4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:59 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 23P9x7nw001111; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:58 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fnq8k34d8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:58 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 23P9rsDA002104; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:56 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3fm938t5xk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:56 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 23PA1rAp43319572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:53 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5C42041; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD6A42045; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:01:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch To: Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Sven Schnelle , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: selftest: Test suppression indication on key prot exception Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:01:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20220425100147.1755340-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20220425100147.1755340-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220425100147.1755340-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 1kaCC2R7GrN33q6ejhT2ceBGBaM6PGJG X-Proofpoint-GUID: Pnd6Od2VZiSgVPB7rr9Wp5c4a_7fZWAK X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-25_06,2022-04-22_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204250040 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Check that suppression is not indicated on injection of a key checked protection exception caused by a memop after it already modified guest memory, as that violates the definition of suppression. Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c index b04c2c1b3c30..ce176ad9f216 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int err_memop_ioctl(struct test_vcpu vcpu, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *ksmo) #define SIDA_OFFSET(o) ._sida_offset = 1, .sida_offset = (o) #define AR(a) ._ar = 1, .ar = (a) #define KEY(a) .f_key = 1, .key = (a) +#define INJECT .f_inject = 1 #define CHECK_N_DO(f, ...) ({ f(__VA_ARGS__, CHECK_ONLY); f(__VA_ARGS__); }) @@ -430,9 +431,18 @@ static void test_copy_key_fetch_prot(void) TEST_ASSERT(rv == 4, "Should result in protection exception"); \ }) +static void guest_error_key(void) +{ + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INITED); + set_storage_key_range(mem1, PAGE_SIZE, 0x18); + set_storage_key_range(mem1 + PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(mem1) - PAGE_SIZE, 0x98); + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_SKEYS_SET); + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_IDLED); +} + static void test_errors_key(void) { - struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot); + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key); HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED); HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET); @@ -446,6 +456,36 @@ static void test_errors_key(void) kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm); } +static void test_termination(void) +{ + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key); + uint64_t prefix; + uint64_t teid; + uint64_t psw[2]; + + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED); + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET); + + /* vcpu, mismatching keys after first page */ + ERR_PROT_MOP(t.vcpu, LOGICAL, WRITE, mem1, t.size, GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(1), INJECT); + /* + * The memop injected a program exception and the test needs to check the + * Translation-Exception Identification (TEID). It is necessary to run + * the guest in order to be able to read the TEID from guest memory. + * Set the guest program new PSW, so the guest state is not clobbered. + */ + prefix = t.run->s.regs.prefix; + psw[0] = t.run->psw_mask; + psw[1] = t.run->psw_addr; + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, WRITE, psw, sizeof(psw), GADDR(prefix + 464)); + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_IDLED); + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, READ, &teid, sizeof(teid), GADDR(prefix + 168)); + /* Bits 56, 60, 61 form a code, 0 being the only one allowing for termination */ + ASSERT_EQ(teid & 0x4c, 0); + + kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm); +} + static void test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(void) { struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot); @@ -668,6 +708,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) test_copy_key_fetch_prot(); test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override(); test_errors_key(); + test_termination(); test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(); test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled(); test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();