diff mbox series

[v3,2/3] kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig repeatable, blindly concat

Message ID 20220627221446.82157-2-dlatypov@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Brendan Higgins
Headers show
Series [v3,1/3] kunit: tool: refactor internal kconfig handling, allow overriding | expand

Commit Message

Daniel Latypov June 27, 2022, 10:14 p.m. UTC
It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig
be repeatable [1][2].

This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g.
  $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \
    ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
or equivalently:
  $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \
    ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin

But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.

And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more
config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML
coverage [2], variants of tests [3].
There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple
--kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).

Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be
incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case
where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values,
but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be
potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.

Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you
either have to do to specify the current build_dir
> --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
or
> --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir,
doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.

Example with conflicting values:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> EOF
> ...
> kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig:
> CONFIG_KUNIT=y
>   vs from /dev/stdin
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
>
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y
>   vs from /dev/stdin
> # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set

[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
v1 -> v3: merge with kunitconfig refactor patch, rename
differing_options() to conflicting_options()
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py           | 13 ++++---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py    | 11 +++++-
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py    | 38 ++++++++++++------
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Comments

Brendan Higgins July 6, 2022, 8:30 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:14 PM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
<kunit-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig
> be repeatable [1][2].
>
> This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g.
>   $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \
>     ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
> or equivalently:
>   $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \
>     ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
>
> But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.
>
> And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more
> config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML
> coverage [2], variants of tests [3].
> There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple
> --kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).
>
> Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be
> incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case
> where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values,
> but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be
> potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.
>
> Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you
> either have to do to specify the current build_dir
> > --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
> or
> > --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
> each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir,
> doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.
>
> Example with conflicting values:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF
> > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> > EOF
> > ...
> > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig:
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> >   vs from /dev/stdin
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> >
> > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y
> >   vs from /dev/stdin
> > # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set
>
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index 13bd72e47da8..163f6b8ac464 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -291,8 +291,9 @@  def add_common_opts(parser) -> None:
 	parser.add_argument('--kunitconfig',
 			     help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests.'
 			     ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" '
-			     'will get  automatically appended.',
-			     metavar='PATH')
+			     'will get  automatically appended. If repeated, the files '
+			     'blindly concatenated, which might not work in all cases.',
+			     action='append', metavar='PATHS')
 	parser.add_argument('--kconfig_add',
 			     help='Additional Kconfig options to append to the '
 			     '.kunitconfig, e.g. CONFIG_KASAN=y. Can be repeated.',
@@ -414,7 +415,7 @@  def main(argv, linux=None):
 
 		if not linux:
 			linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
-					kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
+					kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
 					kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
 					arch=cli_args.arch,
 					cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
@@ -440,7 +441,7 @@  def main(argv, linux=None):
 
 		if not linux:
 			linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
-					kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
+					kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
 					kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
 					arch=cli_args.arch,
 					cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
@@ -457,7 +458,7 @@  def main(argv, linux=None):
 	elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build':
 		if not linux:
 			linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
-					kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
+					kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
 					kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
 					arch=cli_args.arch,
 					cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
@@ -476,7 +477,7 @@  def main(argv, linux=None):
 	elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec':
 		if not linux:
 			linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
-					kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
+					kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
 					kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
 					arch=cli_args.arch,
 					cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
index 898b2a35eb29..48b5f34b2e5d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ 
 
 from dataclasses import dataclass
 import re
-from typing import Dict, Iterable, Set
+from typing import Dict, Iterable, List, Set, Tuple
 
 CONFIG_IS_NOT_SET_PATTERN = r'^# CONFIG_(\w+) is not set$'
 CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+|".*")$'
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@  class Kconfig:
 				return False
 		return True
 
+	def conflicting_options(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]:
+		diff = []  # type: List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]
+		for name, value in self._entries.items():
+			b = other._entries.get(name)
+			if b and value != b:
+				pair = (KconfigEntry(name, value), KconfigEntry(name, b))
+				diff.append(pair)
+		return diff
+
 	def merge_in_entries(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> None:
 		for name, value in other._entries.items():
 			self._entries[name] = value
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
index 4115781185e1..f65c996127c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
@@ -176,6 +176,30 @@  def get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
 def get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
 	return os.path.join(build_dir, OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
 
+def get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir: str,
+			   kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
+	if not kunitconfig_paths:
+		path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
+		if not os.path.exists(path):
+			shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, path)
+		return kunit_config.parse_file(path)
+
+	merged = kunit_config.Kconfig()
+
+	for path in kunitconfig_paths:
+		if os.path.isdir(path):
+			path = os.path.join(path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
+		if not os.path.exists(path):
+			raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({path}) does not exist')
+
+		partial = kunit_config.parse_file(path)
+		diff = merged.conflicting_options(partial)
+		if diff:
+			diff_str = '\n\n'.join(f'{a}\n  vs from {path}\n{b}' for a, b in diff)
+			raise ConfigError(f'Multiple values specified for {len(diff)} options in kunitconfig:\n{diff_str}')
+		merged.merge_in_entries(partial)
+	return merged
+
 def get_outfile_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
 	return os.path.join(build_dir, OUTFILE_PATH)
 
@@ -221,7 +245,7 @@  class LinuxSourceTree:
 	      self,
 	      build_dir: str,
 	      load_config=True,
-	      kunitconfig_path='',
+	      kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None,
 	      kconfig_add: Optional[List[str]]=None,
 	      arch=None,
 	      cross_compile=None,
@@ -237,17 +261,7 @@  class LinuxSourceTree:
 		if not load_config:
 			return
 
-		if kunitconfig_path:
-			if os.path.isdir(kunitconfig_path):
-				kunitconfig_path = os.path.join(kunitconfig_path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
-			if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path):
-				raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({kunitconfig_path}) does not exist')
-		else:
-			kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
-			if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path):
-				shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path)
-
-		self._kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kunitconfig_path)
+		self._kconfig = get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir, kunitconfig_paths)
 		if kconfig_add:
 			kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string('\n'.join(kconfig_add))
 			self._kconfig.merge_in_entries(kconfig)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 0fbca18b6e65..0c5ba3ed35e6 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -356,17 +356,46 @@  class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
 
 	def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self):
 		with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'):
-			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file')
+			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file'])
 
 	def test_valid_kunitconfig(self):
 		with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig:
-			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name)
+			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name])
 
 	def test_dir_kunitconfig(self):
 		with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
 			with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'):
 				pass
-			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
+			kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir])
+
+	def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self):
+		want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
+		want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y')
+		want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm')
+
+		with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
+			other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig')
+			with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f:
+				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+			with open(other, 'w') as f:
+				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m')
+				pass
+
+			tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other])
+			self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig)
+
+
+	def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self):
+		with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
+			other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig')
+			with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f:
+				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+			with open(other, 'w') as f:
+				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m')
+
+			with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'):
+				kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other])
+
 
 	def test_kconfig_add(self):
 		want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
@@ -637,7 +666,7 @@  class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
 		kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig'])
 		# Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
 		mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
-							kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
+							kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'],
 							kconfig_add=None,
 							arch='um',
 							cross_compile=None,
@@ -649,19 +678,32 @@  class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
 		kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig'])
 		# Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
 		mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
-							kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
+							kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'],
 							kconfig_add=None,
 							arch='um',
 							cross_compile=None,
 							qemu_config_path=None)
 
+	@mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
+	def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init):
+		mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock
+		kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other'])
+		# Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
+		mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
+							kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'],
+							kconfig_add=None,
+							arch='um',
+							cross_compile=None,
+							qemu_config_path=None)
+
+
 	@mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
 	def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init):
 		mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock
 		kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y'])
 		# Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
 		mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
-							kunitconfig_path=None,
+							kunitconfig_paths=None,
 							kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'],
 							arch='um',
 							cross_compile=None,