diff mbox series

[v2,5/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree(NULL) a no-op to match kfree()

Message ID 20220722171534.3576419-5-dlatypov@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 185d57797c5ea82e941befc2489dba0cf162b9c4
Delegated to: Brendan Higgins
Headers show
Series [v2,1/5] kunit: string-stream: Simplify resource use | expand

Commit Message

Daniel Latypov July 22, 2022, 5:15 p.m. UTC
The real kfree() function will silently return when given a NULL.
So a user might reasonably think they can write the following code:
  char *buffer = NULL;
  if (param->use_buffer) buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 10, GFP_KERNEL);
  ...
  kunit_kfree(test, buffer);

As-is, kunit_kfree() will mark the test as FAILED when buffer is NULL.
(And in earlier times, it would segfault).

Let's match the semantics of kfree().

Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: add this patch to the series.
---
 lib/kunit/test.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

David Gow July 23, 2022, 6:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 1:15 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> The real kfree() function will silently return when given a NULL.
> So a user might reasonably think they can write the following code:
>   char *buffer = NULL;
>   if (param->use_buffer) buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 10, GFP_KERNEL);
>   ...
>   kunit_kfree(test, buffer);
>
> As-is, kunit_kfree() will mark the test as FAILED when buffer is NULL.
> (And in earlier times, it would segfault).
>
> Let's match the semantics of kfree().
>
> Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: add this patch to the series.
> ---

Thanks! This looks good to me, and worked with a basic test.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David

>  lib/kunit/test.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index c7ca87484968..879c8db36cb5 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
>
>  void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
>  {
> +       if (!ptr)
> +               return;
> +
>         if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
>                 KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
>  }
> --
> 2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog
>
Brendan Higgins Oct. 5, 2022, 8:40 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:15 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> The real kfree() function will silently return when given a NULL.
> So a user might reasonably think they can write the following code:
>   char *buffer = NULL;
>   if (param->use_buffer) buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 10, GFP_KERNEL);
>   ...
>   kunit_kfree(test, buffer);
>
> As-is, kunit_kfree() will mark the test as FAILED when buffer is NULL.
> (And in earlier times, it would segfault).
>
> Let's match the semantics of kfree().
>
> Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index c7ca87484968..879c8db36cb5 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -698,6 +698,9 @@  static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
 
 void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
 {
+	if (!ptr)
+		return;
+
 	if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
 		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
 }