From patchwork Tue Nov 1 09:43:41 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shaopeng Tan X-Patchwork-Id: 13026827 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0753FA3743 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 09:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230437AbiKAJtZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 05:49:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55610 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229511AbiKAJsy (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 05:48:54 -0400 Received: from esa2.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com (esa2.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com [207.54.90.48]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E72E1902A; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 02:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10517"; a="94348500" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,230,1661785200"; d="scan'208";a="94348500" Received: from unknown (HELO yto-r2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com) ([218.44.52.218]) by esa2.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2022 18:48:51 +0900 Received: from yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (yto-nat-yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com [192.168.83.65]) by yto-r2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A59D63B6; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:48:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from oym-om4.fujitsu.com (oym-om4.o.css.fujitsu.com [10.85.58.164]) by yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587B1D35F3; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:48:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from cn-r05-10.example.com (n3235113.np.ts.nmh.cs.fujitsu.co.jp [10.123.235.113]) by oym-om4.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376CF40164011; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:48:49 +0900 (JST) From: Shaopeng Tan To: Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:43:41 +0900 Message-Id: <20221101094341.3383073-6-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20221101094341.3383073-1-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20221101094341.3383073-1-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Before exiting each test function(run_cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test()), test results("ok","not ok") are printed by ksft_test_result() and then temporary result files are cleaned by function cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test_cleanup(). However, before running ksft_test_result(), function cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test_cleanup() has been run in each test function as follows: cmt_resctrl_val() cat_perf_miss_val() mba_schemata_change() mbm_bw_change() Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file. Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c index df0d8d8526fc..8732cf736528 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ static void run_mbm_test(bool has_ben, char **benchmark_cmd, int span, ksft_test_result(!res, "MBM: bw change\n"); if ((get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) && res) ksft_print_msg("Intel MBM may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n"); - mbm_test_cleanup(); } static void run_mba_test(bool has_ben, char **benchmark_cmd, int span, @@ -107,7 +106,6 @@ static void run_mba_test(bool has_ben, char **benchmark_cmd, int span, sprintf(benchmark_cmd[1], "%d", span); res = mba_schemata_change(cpu_no, bw_report, benchmark_cmd); ksft_test_result(!res, "MBA: schemata change\n"); - mba_test_cleanup(); } static void run_cmt_test(bool has_ben, char **benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no) @@ -126,7 +124,6 @@ static void run_cmt_test(bool has_ben, char **benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no) ksft_test_result(!res, "CMT: test\n"); if ((get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) && res) ksft_print_msg("Intel CMT may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n"); - cmt_test_cleanup(); } static void run_cat_test(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits) @@ -142,7 +139,6 @@ static void run_cat_test(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits) res = cat_perf_miss_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, "L3"); ksft_test_result(!res, "CAT: test\n"); - cat_test_cleanup(); } int main(int argc, char **argv)