@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ IPV4_TESTS="
ipv4_large_res_grp
ipv4_compat_mode
ipv4_fdb_grp_fcnal
+ ipv4_mpath_select
ipv4_torture
ipv4_res_torture
"
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ IPV6_TESTS="
ipv6_large_res_grp
ipv6_compat_mode
ipv6_fdb_grp_fcnal
+ ipv6_mpath_select
ipv6_torture
ipv6_res_torture
"
@@ -370,6 +372,27 @@ check_large_res_grp()
log_test $? 0 "Dump large (x$buckets) nexthop buckets"
}
+get_route_dev()
+{
+ local pfx="$1"
+ local out
+
+ if out=$($IP -j route get "$pfx" | jq -re ".[0].dev"); then
+ echo "$out"
+ fi
+}
+
+check_route_dev()
+{
+ local pfx="$1"
+ local expected="$2"
+ local out
+
+ out=$(get_route_dev "$pfx")
+
+ check_output "$out" "$expected"
+}
+
start_ip_monitor()
{
local mtype=$1
@@ -575,6 +598,112 @@ ipv4_fdb_grp_fcnal()
$IP link del dev vx10
}
+ipv4_mpath_select()
+{
+ local rc dev match h addr
+
+ echo
+ echo "IPv4 multipath selection"
+ echo "------------------------"
+ if [ ! -x "$(command -v jq)" ]; then
+ echo "SKIP: Could not run test; need jq tool"
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+
+ # Use status of existing neighbor entry when determining nexthop for
+ # multipath routes.
+ local -A gws
+ gws=([veth1]=172.16.1.2 [veth3]=172.16.2.2)
+ local -A other_dev
+ other_dev=([veth1]=veth3 [veth3]=veth1)
+
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 1 via ${gws["veth1"]} dev veth1"
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 2 via ${gws["veth3"]} dev veth3"
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 1001 group 1/2"
+ run_cmd "$IP ro add 172.16.101.0/24 nhid 1001"
+ rc=0
+ for dev in veth1 veth3; do
+ match=0
+ for h in {1..254}; do
+ addr="172.16.101.$h"
+ if [ "$(get_route_dev "$addr")" = "$dev" ]; then
+ match=1
+ break
+ fi
+ done
+ if (( match == 0 )); then
+ echo "SKIP: Did not find a route using device $dev"
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add ${gws[$dev]} dev $dev nud failed"
+ if ! check_route_dev "$addr" "${other_dev[$dev]}"; then
+ rc=1
+ break
+ fi
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh del ${gws[$dev]} dev $dev"
+ done
+ log_test $rc 0 "Use valid neighbor during multipath selection"
+
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add 172.16.1.2 dev veth1 nud incomplete"
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add 172.16.2.2 dev veth3 nud incomplete"
+ run_cmd "$IP route get 172.16.101.1"
+ # if we did not crash, success
+ log_test $rc 0 "Multipath selection with no valid neighbor"
+}
+
+ipv6_mpath_select()
+{
+ local rc dev match h addr
+
+ echo
+ echo "IPv6 multipath selection"
+ echo "------------------------"
+ if [ ! -x "$(command -v jq)" ]; then
+ echo "SKIP: Could not run test; need jq tool"
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+
+ # Use status of existing neighbor entry when determining nexthop for
+ # multipath routes.
+ local -A gws
+ gws=([veth1]=2001:db8:91::2 [veth3]=2001:db8:92::2)
+ local -A other_dev
+ other_dev=([veth1]=veth3 [veth3]=veth1)
+
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 1 via ${gws["veth1"]} dev veth1"
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 2 via ${gws["veth3"]} dev veth3"
+ run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 1001 group 1/2"
+ run_cmd "$IP ro add 2001:db8:101::/64 nhid 1001"
+ rc=0
+ for dev in veth1 veth3; do
+ match=0
+ for h in {1..65535}; do
+ addr=$(printf "2001:db8:101::%x" $h)
+ if [ "$(get_route_dev "$addr")" = "$dev" ]; then
+ match=1
+ break
+ fi
+ done
+ if (( match == 0 )); then
+ echo "SKIP: Did not find a route using device $dev"
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add ${gws[$dev]} dev $dev nud failed"
+ if ! check_route_dev "$addr" "${other_dev[$dev]}"; then
+ rc=1
+ break
+ fi
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh del ${gws[$dev]} dev $dev"
+ done
+ log_test $rc 0 "Use valid neighbor during multipath selection"
+
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add 2001:db8:91::2 dev veth1 nud incomplete"
+ run_cmd "$IP neigh add 2001:db8:92::2 dev veth3 nud incomplete"
+ run_cmd "$IP route get 2001:db8:101::1"
+ # if we did not crash, success
+ log_test $rc 0 "Multipath selection with no valid neighbor"
+}
+
################################################################################
# basic operations (add, delete, replace) on nexthops and nexthop groups
#
Add test cases for hash threshold (multipath) nexthop groups with invalid neighbors. Check that a nexthop with invalid neighbor is not selected when there is another nexthop with a valid neighbor. Check that there is no crash when there is no nexthop with a valid neighbor. The first test fails before the previous commit in this series. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)