diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,3/3] selftests/bpf: add testcase for FENTRY/FEXIT with 6+ arguments

Message ID 20230607125911.145345-4-imagedong@tencent.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING | expand

Commit Message

Menglong Dong June 7, 2023, 12:59 p.m. UTC 
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>

Add test9/test10 in fexit_test.c and fentry_test.c to test the fentry
and fexit whose target function have 7/12 arguments.

Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
bpf_testmod_fentry_test12() to bpf_testmod.c

And the testcases passed:

./test_progs -t fexit
Summary: 5/12 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

./test_progs -t fentry
Summary: 3/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
---
v3:
- move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to
  bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile
- get return value by bpf_get_func_ret() in
  "fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12", as we don't change ___bpf_ctx_cast()
  in this version
---
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |  4 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c    |  2 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c     |  2 ++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 21 ++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov June 7, 2023, 8:10 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:59:11PM +0800, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> 
> Add test9/test10 in fexit_test.c and fentry_test.c to test the fentry
> and fexit whose target function have 7/12 arguments.
> 
> Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
> bpf_testmod_fentry_test12() to bpf_testmod.c
> 
> And the testcases passed:
> 
> ./test_progs -t fexit
> Summary: 5/12 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> ./test_progs -t fentry
> Summary: 3/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to
>   bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile
> - get return value by bpf_get_func_ret() in
>   "fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12", as we don't change ___bpf_ctx_cast()
>   in this version
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++++++++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |  4 ++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c    |  2 ++
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c     |  2 ++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 21 ++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> index cf216041876c..66615fdbe3df 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,19 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
>  	return a + b + c;
>  }
>  
> +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
> +				      void *e, u64 f, u64 g)
> +{
> +	return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test12(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
> +				       void *e, u64 f, u64 g, u64 h,
> +				       u64 i, u64 j, u64 k, u64 l)

Please switch args to a combination of u8,u16,u32,u64.
u64 only args might hide bugs.
Menglong Dong June 8, 2023, 4:39 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:10 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:59:11PM +0800, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> >
> > Add test9/test10 in fexit_test.c and fentry_test.c to test the fentry
> > and fexit whose target function have 7/12 arguments.
> >
> > Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
> > bpf_testmod_fentry_test12() to bpf_testmod.c
> >
> > And the testcases passed:
> >
> > ./test_progs -t fexit
> > Summary: 5/12 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> >
> > ./test_progs -t fentry
> > Summary: 3/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to
> >   bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile
> > - get return value by bpf_get_func_ret() in
> >   "fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12", as we don't change ___bpf_ctx_cast()
> >   in this version
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++++++++-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |  4 ++-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c    |  2 ++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c     |  2 ++
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 21 ++++++++++++
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> > index cf216041876c..66615fdbe3df 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> > @@ -191,6 +191,19 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
> >       return a + b + c;
> >  }
> >
> > +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
> > +                                   void *e, u64 f, u64 g)
> > +{
> > +     return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g;
> > +}
> > +
> > +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test12(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
> > +                                    void *e, u64 f, u64 g, u64 h,
> > +                                    u64 i, u64 j, u64 k, u64 l)
>
> Please switch args to a combination of u8,u16,u32,u64.
> u64 only args might hide bugs.

Okay, that makes sense.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index cf216041876c..66615fdbe3df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -191,6 +191,19 @@  noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
 	return a + b + c;
 }
 
+noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
+				      void *e, u64 f, u64 g)
+{
+	return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g;
+}
+
+noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test12(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
+				       void *e, u64 f, u64 g, u64 h,
+				       u64 i, u64 j, u64 k, u64 l)
+{
+	return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g + h + i + j + k + l;
+}
+
 __diag_pop();
 
 int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
@@ -245,7 +258,11 @@  bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
 
 	if (bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(1) != 2 ||
 	    bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(2, 3) != 5 ||
-	    bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15)
+	    bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15 ||
+	    bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
+				     21, 22) != 133 ||
+	    bpf_testmod_fentry_test12(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
+				      21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) != 258)
 		goto out;
 
 	bpf_testmod_fentry_ok = 1;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
index 130f5b82d2e6..5b99e6ce7dd2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
@@ -31,10 +31,12 @@  void test_fentry_fexit(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "ipv6 test_run");
 	ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "ipv6 test retval");
 
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
+
 	fentry_res = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss;
 	fexit_res = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss;
 	printf("%lld\n", fentry_skel->bss->test1_result);
-	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 		ASSERT_EQ(fentry_res[i], 1, "fentry result");
 		ASSERT_EQ(fexit_res[i], 1, "fexit result");
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
index c0d1d61d5f66..e1c0ce40febf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@  static int fentry_test(struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
 	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
 
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
+
 	result = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss;
 	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*fentry_skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64); i++) {
 		if (!ASSERT_EQ(result[i], 1, "fentry_result"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
index 101b7343036b..ea81fa913ec6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@  static int fexit_test(struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
 	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
 
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
+
 	result = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss;
 	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*fexit_skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64); i++) {
 		if (!ASSERT_EQ(result[i], 1, "fexit_result"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
index 52a550d281d9..e5fb79e4a147 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
@@ -77,3 +77,24 @@  int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
 		test8_result = 1;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+__u64 test9_result = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7")
+int BPF_PROG(test9, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f,
+	     __u64 g)
+{
+	test9_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+		e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test10_result = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12")
+int BPF_PROG(test10, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f,
+	     __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k, __u64 l)
+{
+	test10_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+		e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+		i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && l == 27;
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c
index 8f1ccb7302e1..6279c535a1e8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c
@@ -78,3 +78,36 @@  int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
 		test8_result = 1;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+__u64 test9_result = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7")
+int BPF_PROG(test9, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f,
+	     __u64 g, int ret)
+{
+	test9_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+		e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && ret == 133;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test10_result = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12")
+int BPF_PROG(test10, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f,
+	     __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k, __u64 l)
+{
+	__u64 ret;
+	int err;
+
+	/* BPF_PROG() don't support 14 arguments, and ctx[12] can't be
+	 * accessed yet. So we get the return value by bpf_get_func_ret()
+	 * for now.
+	 */
+	err = bpf_get_func_ret(ctx, &ret);
+	if (err)
+		return 0;
+
+	test10_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+		e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+		i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && l == 27 &&
+		(int)ret == 258;
+	return 0;
+}