diff mbox series

[2/3] rust: macros: add macro to easily run KUnit tests

Message ID 20230720-rustbind-v1-2-c80db349e3b5@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series rust: kunit: Support KUnit tests with a user-space like syntax | expand

Commit Message

David Gow July 20, 2023, 6:38 a.m. UTC
From: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>

Add a new procedural macro (`#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]`) to
run KUnit tests using a user-space like syntax.

The macro, that should be used on modules, transforms every `#[test]`
in a `kunit_case!` and adds a `kunit_unsafe_test_suite!` registering
all of them.

The only difference with user-space tests is that instead of using
`#[cfg(test)]`, `#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]` is used.

Note that `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` is added so the test module is not
compiled when `CONFIG_KUNIT` is set to `n`.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS          |   1 +
 rust/kernel/kunit.rs |  11 ++++
 rust/macros/kunit.rs | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/macros/lib.rs   |  29 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+)

Comments

Boqun Feng July 30, 2023, 9:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:38:53PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> From: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
> 
> Add a new procedural macro (`#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]`) to
> run KUnit tests using a user-space like syntax.
> 
> The macro, that should be used on modules, transforms every `#[test]`
> in a `kunit_case!` and adds a `kunit_unsafe_test_suite!` registering
> all of them.
> 
> The only difference with user-space tests is that instead of using
> `#[cfg(test)]`, `#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]` is used.
> 
> Note that `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` is added so the test module is not
> compiled when `CONFIG_KUNIT` is set to `n`.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS          |   1 +
>  rust/kernel/kunit.rs |  11 ++++
>  rust/macros/kunit.rs | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  rust/macros/lib.rs   |  29 ++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 190 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 2a942fe59144..c32ba6b29a96 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -11373,6 +11373,7 @@ F:	Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/
>  F:	include/kunit/
>  F:	lib/kunit/
>  F:	rust/kernel/kunit.rs
> +F:	rust/macros/kunit.rs
>  F:	scripts/rustdoc_test_*
>  F:	tools/testing/kunit/
>  
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
> index 4cffc71e463b..44ea67028316 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ pub fn info(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
>      }
>  }
>  
> +use macros::kunit_tests;
> +
>  /// Asserts that a boolean expression is `true` at runtime.
>  ///
>  /// Public but hidden since it should only be used from generated tests.
> @@ -253,3 +255,12 @@ macro_rules! kunit_unsafe_test_suite {
>          };
>      };
>  }
> +
> +#[kunit_tests(rust_kernel_kunit)]
> +mod tests {
> +    #[test]
> +    fn rust_test_kunit_kunit_tests() {
> +        let running = true;
> +        assert_eq!(running, true);
> +    }
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/macros/kunit.rs b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..69dac253232f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Procedural macro to run KUnit tests using a user-space like syntax.
> +//!
> +//! Copyright (c) 2023 José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
> +
> +use proc_macro::{Delimiter, Group, TokenStream, TokenTree};
> +use std::fmt::Write;
> +
> +pub(crate) fn kunit_tests(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> +    if attr.to_string().is_empty() {
> +        panic!("Missing test name in #[kunit_tests(test_name)] macro")
> +    }
> +
> +    let mut tokens: Vec<_> = ts.into_iter().collect();
> +
> +    // Scan for the "mod" keyword.
> +    tokens
> +        .iter()
> +        .find_map(|token| match token {
> +            TokenTree::Ident(ident) => match ident.to_string().as_str() {
> +                "mod" => Some(true),
> +                _ => None,
> +            },
> +            _ => None,
> +        })
> +        .expect("#[kunit_tests(test_name)] attribute should only be applied to modules");
> +
> +    // Retrieve the main body. The main body should be the last token tree.
> +    let body = match tokens.pop() {
> +        Some(TokenTree::Group(group)) if group.delimiter() == Delimiter::Brace => group,
> +        _ => panic!("cannot locate main body of module"),
> +    };
> +
> +    // Get the functions set as tests. Search for `[test]` -> `fn`.
> +    let mut body_it = body.stream().into_iter();
> +    let mut tests = Vec::new();
> +    while let Some(token) = body_it.next() {
> +        match token {
> +            TokenTree::Group(ident) if ident.to_string() == "[test]" => match body_it.next() {
> +                Some(TokenTree::Ident(ident)) if ident.to_string() == "fn" => {
> +                    let test_name = match body_it.next() {
> +                        Some(TokenTree::Ident(ident)) => ident.to_string(),
> +                        _ => continue,
> +                    };
> +                    tests.push(test_name);
> +                }
> +                _ => continue,
> +            },
> +            _ => (),
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    // Add `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` before the module declaration.
> +    let config_kunit = "#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]".to_owned().parse().unwrap();
> +    tokens.insert(
> +        0,
> +        TokenTree::Group(Group::new(Delimiter::None, config_kunit)),
> +    );
> +
> +    // Generate the test KUnit test suite and a test case for each `#[test]`.
> +    // The code generated for the following test module:
> +    //
> +    // ```
> +    // #[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]
> +    // mod tests {
> +    //     #[test]
> +    //     fn foo() {
> +    //         assert_eq!(1, 1);
> +    //     }
> +    //
> +    //     #[test]
> +    //     fn bar() {
> +    //         assert_eq!(2, 2);
> +    //     }
> +    // ```
> +    //
> +    // Looks like:
> +    //
> +    // ```
> +    // unsafe extern "C" fn kunit_rust_wrapper_foo(_test: *mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {
> +    //     foo();
> +    // }
> +    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_FOO: kernel::bindings::kunit_case =
> +    //     kernel::kunit_case!(foo, kunit_rust_wrapper_foo);
> +    //
> +    // unsafe extern "C" fn kunit_rust_wrapper_bar(_test: * mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {
> +    //     bar();
> +    // }
> +    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_BAR: kernel::bindings::kunit_case =
> +    //     kernel::kunit_case!(bar, kunit_rust_wrapper_bar);
> +    //
> +    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_NULL: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!();
> +    //
> +    // static mut TEST_CASES : &mut[kernel::bindings::kunit_case] = unsafe {
> +    //     &mut [KUNIT_CASE_FOO, KUNIT_CASE_BAR, KUNIT_CASE_NULL]
> +    // };
> +    //
> +    // kernel::kunit_unsafe_test_suite!(kunit_test_suit_name, TEST_CASES);
> +    // ```
> +    let mut kunit_macros = "".to_owned();
> +    let mut test_cases = "".to_owned();
> +    for test in tests {
> +        let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test);
> +        let kunit_case_name = format!("KUNIT_CASE_{}", test.to_uppercase());
> +        let kunit_wrapper = format!(
> +            "unsafe extern \"C\" fn {}(_test: *mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {{ {}(); }}",
> +            kunit_wrapper_fn_name, test
> +        );
> +        let kunit_case = format!(
> +            "static mut {}: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!({}, {});",
> +            kunit_case_name, test, kunit_wrapper_fn_name
> +        );
> +        writeln!(kunit_macros, "{kunit_wrapper}").unwrap();
> +        writeln!(kunit_macros, "{kunit_case}").unwrap();
> +        writeln!(test_cases, "{kunit_case_name},").unwrap();
> +    }
> +
> +    writeln!(
> +        kunit_macros,
> +        "static mut KUNIT_CASE_NULL: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!();"
> +    )
> +    .unwrap();
> +
> +    writeln!(
> +        kunit_macros,
> +        "static mut TEST_CASES : &mut[kernel::bindings::kunit_case] = unsafe {{ &mut[{test_cases} KUNIT_CASE_NULL] }};"
> +    )
> +    .unwrap();
> +
> +    writeln!(
> +        kunit_macros,
> +        "kernel::kunit_unsafe_test_suite!({attr}, TEST_CASES);"
> +    )
> +    .unwrap();
> +
> +    let new_body: TokenStream = vec![body.stream(), kunit_macros.parse().unwrap()]
> +        .into_iter()
> +        .collect();
> +
> +    // Remove the `#[test]` macros.
> +    let new_body = new_body.to_string().replace("#[test]", "");

I've played this with some extra tests, one thing I notice is that
Span/code location information is lost if we do this, for example, if I
have a compile error in the test code (I introduced one on purpose in
the `rust_kernel_kunit` test), I will get information like:

	error[E0384]: cannot assign twice to immutable variable `running`
	   --> ../rust/kernel/kunit.rs:329:1
	    |
	329 | #[kunit_tests(rust_kernel_kunit)]
	    | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	    | |
	    | cannot assign twice to immutable variable
	    | help: consider making this binding mutable: `mut running`

the location information is not very usefull. However if we do the
following:

diff --git a/rust/macros/kunit.rs b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
index 69dac253232f..913879765d24 100644
--- a/rust/macros/kunit.rs
+++ b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
@@ -134,15 +134,29 @@ pub(crate) fn kunit_tests(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
     )
     .unwrap();
 
-    let new_body: TokenStream = vec![body.stream(), kunit_macros.parse().unwrap()]
-        .into_iter()
-        .collect();
-
     // Remove the `#[test]` macros.
-    let new_body = new_body.to_string().replace("#[test]", "");
+    let mut new_body = vec![];
+    let mut body_it = body.stream().into_iter();
+
+    while let Some(token) = body_it.next() {
+        match token {
+            TokenTree::Punct(ref c) if c.as_char() == '#' => {
+                match body_it.next() {
+                    Some(TokenTree::Group(g)) if g.to_string() == "[test]" => (),
+                    Some(next) => { new_body.extend([token, next]);},
+                    _ => {new_body.push(token);},
+                }
+            }
+            _ => { new_body.push(token); }
+        }
+    }
+
+    let mut new_body = TokenStream::from_iter(new_body);
+    new_body.extend::<TokenStream>(kunit_macros.parse().unwrap());
+
     tokens.push(TokenTree::Group(Group::new(
         Delimiter::Brace,
-        new_body.parse().unwrap(),
+        new_body
     )));
 
     tokens.into_iter().collect()


then we get better information:

	   --> ../rust/kernel/kunit.rs:335:13
	    |
	335 |         let running = true;
	    |             ^^^^^^^
	    |
	    = help: maybe it is overwritten before being read?
	    = note: `#[warn(unused_assignments)]` on by default

	error[E0384]: cannot assign twice to immutable variable `running`
	   --> ../rust/kernel/kunit.rs:336:9
	    |
	335 |         let running = true;
	    |             -------
	    |             |
	    |             first assignment to `running`
	    |             help: consider making this binding mutable: `mut running`
	336 |         running = false;
	    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot assign twice to immutable variable


Regards,
Boqun

> +    tokens.push(TokenTree::Group(Group::new(
> +        Delimiter::Brace,
> +        new_body.parse().unwrap(),
> +    )));
> +
> +    tokens.into_iter().collect()
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/macros/lib.rs b/rust/macros/lib.rs
> index 3fc74cb4ea19..cd0b720514ff 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/lib.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/lib.rs
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  mod quote;
>  mod concat_idents;
>  mod helpers;
> +mod kunit;
>  mod module;
>  mod pin_data;
>  mod pinned_drop;
> @@ -246,3 +247,31 @@ pub fn pin_data(inner: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
>  pub fn pinned_drop(args: TokenStream, input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
>      pinned_drop::pinned_drop(args, input)
>  }
> +
> +/// Registers a KUnit test suite and its test cases using a user-space like syntax.
> +///
> +/// This macro should be used on modules. If `CONFIG_KUNIT` (in `.config`) is `n`, the target module
> +/// is ignored.
> +///
> +/// # Examples
> +///
> +/// ```ignore
> +/// # use macros::kunit_tests;
> +///
> +/// #[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]
> +/// mod tests {
> +///     #[test]
> +///     fn foo() {
> +///         assert_eq!(1, 1);
> +///     }
> +///
> +///     #[test]
> +///     fn bar() {
> +///         assert_eq!(2, 2);
> +///     }
> +/// }
> +/// ```
> +#[proc_macro_attribute]
> +pub fn kunit_tests(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> +    kunit::kunit_tests(attr, ts)
> +}
> 
> -- 
> 2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog
>
Miguel Ojeda Aug. 1, 2023, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:40 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> The only difference with user-space tests is that instead of using
> `#[cfg(test)]`, `#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]` is used.

I may be missing something, but this does not appear to map the
`assert*!`s to the KUnit APIs, is that correct? (i.e. like we do for
`rustdoc`-tests).

I made an assertion fail, and it seems to use the standard library
macros, thus panicking and ending up in `BUG()` (rather than a failed
test):

    rust_kernel: panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
      left: `true`,
     right: `false`', rust/kernel/kunit.rs:329:1
    ------------[ cut here ]------------
    kernel BUG at rust/helpers.c:34!

Then the test times out eventually and things break:

        # rust_test_kunit_kunit_tests: try timed out
    ------------[ cut here ]------------
    refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.

> +    // Add `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` before the module declaration.
> +    let config_kunit = "#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]".to_owned().parse().unwrap();
> +    tokens.insert(
> +        0,
> +        TokenTree::Group(Group::new(Delimiter::None, config_kunit)),
> +    );

I wonder about compile-time here with this approach. As far as I
understand, having the `cfg` explicitly outside the proc macro would
avoid invoking it.

Do we know the potential compile-time impact, especially when we will
have many tests?
ventually it would be ideal to have an approach closer to the
`rustdoc` one, where the compiler finds the tests for us and we
generate the needed code in the build system, i.e. outside a proc
macro.

Cheers,
Miguel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2a942fe59144..c32ba6b29a96 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11373,6 +11373,7 @@  F:	Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/
 F:	include/kunit/
 F:	lib/kunit/
 F:	rust/kernel/kunit.rs
+F:	rust/macros/kunit.rs
 F:	scripts/rustdoc_test_*
 F:	tools/testing/kunit/
 
diff --git a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
index 4cffc71e463b..44ea67028316 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@  pub fn info(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
     }
 }
 
+use macros::kunit_tests;
+
 /// Asserts that a boolean expression is `true` at runtime.
 ///
 /// Public but hidden since it should only be used from generated tests.
@@ -253,3 +255,12 @@  macro_rules! kunit_unsafe_test_suite {
         };
     };
 }
+
+#[kunit_tests(rust_kernel_kunit)]
+mod tests {
+    #[test]
+    fn rust_test_kunit_kunit_tests() {
+        let running = true;
+        assert_eq!(running, true);
+    }
+}
diff --git a/rust/macros/kunit.rs b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..69dac253232f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+//! Procedural macro to run KUnit tests using a user-space like syntax.
+//!
+//! Copyright (c) 2023 José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
+
+use proc_macro::{Delimiter, Group, TokenStream, TokenTree};
+use std::fmt::Write;
+
+pub(crate) fn kunit_tests(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
+    if attr.to_string().is_empty() {
+        panic!("Missing test name in #[kunit_tests(test_name)] macro")
+    }
+
+    let mut tokens: Vec<_> = ts.into_iter().collect();
+
+    // Scan for the "mod" keyword.
+    tokens
+        .iter()
+        .find_map(|token| match token {
+            TokenTree::Ident(ident) => match ident.to_string().as_str() {
+                "mod" => Some(true),
+                _ => None,
+            },
+            _ => None,
+        })
+        .expect("#[kunit_tests(test_name)] attribute should only be applied to modules");
+
+    // Retrieve the main body. The main body should be the last token tree.
+    let body = match tokens.pop() {
+        Some(TokenTree::Group(group)) if group.delimiter() == Delimiter::Brace => group,
+        _ => panic!("cannot locate main body of module"),
+    };
+
+    // Get the functions set as tests. Search for `[test]` -> `fn`.
+    let mut body_it = body.stream().into_iter();
+    let mut tests = Vec::new();
+    while let Some(token) = body_it.next() {
+        match token {
+            TokenTree::Group(ident) if ident.to_string() == "[test]" => match body_it.next() {
+                Some(TokenTree::Ident(ident)) if ident.to_string() == "fn" => {
+                    let test_name = match body_it.next() {
+                        Some(TokenTree::Ident(ident)) => ident.to_string(),
+                        _ => continue,
+                    };
+                    tests.push(test_name);
+                }
+                _ => continue,
+            },
+            _ => (),
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Add `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` before the module declaration.
+    let config_kunit = "#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]".to_owned().parse().unwrap();
+    tokens.insert(
+        0,
+        TokenTree::Group(Group::new(Delimiter::None, config_kunit)),
+    );
+
+    // Generate the test KUnit test suite and a test case for each `#[test]`.
+    // The code generated for the following test module:
+    //
+    // ```
+    // #[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]
+    // mod tests {
+    //     #[test]
+    //     fn foo() {
+    //         assert_eq!(1, 1);
+    //     }
+    //
+    //     #[test]
+    //     fn bar() {
+    //         assert_eq!(2, 2);
+    //     }
+    // ```
+    //
+    // Looks like:
+    //
+    // ```
+    // unsafe extern "C" fn kunit_rust_wrapper_foo(_test: *mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {
+    //     foo();
+    // }
+    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_FOO: kernel::bindings::kunit_case =
+    //     kernel::kunit_case!(foo, kunit_rust_wrapper_foo);
+    //
+    // unsafe extern "C" fn kunit_rust_wrapper_bar(_test: * mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {
+    //     bar();
+    // }
+    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_BAR: kernel::bindings::kunit_case =
+    //     kernel::kunit_case!(bar, kunit_rust_wrapper_bar);
+    //
+    // static mut KUNIT_CASE_NULL: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!();
+    //
+    // static mut TEST_CASES : &mut[kernel::bindings::kunit_case] = unsafe {
+    //     &mut [KUNIT_CASE_FOO, KUNIT_CASE_BAR, KUNIT_CASE_NULL]
+    // };
+    //
+    // kernel::kunit_unsafe_test_suite!(kunit_test_suit_name, TEST_CASES);
+    // ```
+    let mut kunit_macros = "".to_owned();
+    let mut test_cases = "".to_owned();
+    for test in tests {
+        let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test);
+        let kunit_case_name = format!("KUNIT_CASE_{}", test.to_uppercase());
+        let kunit_wrapper = format!(
+            "unsafe extern \"C\" fn {}(_test: *mut kernel::bindings::kunit) {{ {}(); }}",
+            kunit_wrapper_fn_name, test
+        );
+        let kunit_case = format!(
+            "static mut {}: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!({}, {});",
+            kunit_case_name, test, kunit_wrapper_fn_name
+        );
+        writeln!(kunit_macros, "{kunit_wrapper}").unwrap();
+        writeln!(kunit_macros, "{kunit_case}").unwrap();
+        writeln!(test_cases, "{kunit_case_name},").unwrap();
+    }
+
+    writeln!(
+        kunit_macros,
+        "static mut KUNIT_CASE_NULL: kernel::bindings::kunit_case = kernel::kunit_case!();"
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+
+    writeln!(
+        kunit_macros,
+        "static mut TEST_CASES : &mut[kernel::bindings::kunit_case] = unsafe {{ &mut[{test_cases} KUNIT_CASE_NULL] }};"
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+
+    writeln!(
+        kunit_macros,
+        "kernel::kunit_unsafe_test_suite!({attr}, TEST_CASES);"
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+
+    let new_body: TokenStream = vec![body.stream(), kunit_macros.parse().unwrap()]
+        .into_iter()
+        .collect();
+
+    // Remove the `#[test]` macros.
+    let new_body = new_body.to_string().replace("#[test]", "");
+    tokens.push(TokenTree::Group(Group::new(
+        Delimiter::Brace,
+        new_body.parse().unwrap(),
+    )));
+
+    tokens.into_iter().collect()
+}
diff --git a/rust/macros/lib.rs b/rust/macros/lib.rs
index 3fc74cb4ea19..cd0b720514ff 100644
--- a/rust/macros/lib.rs
+++ b/rust/macros/lib.rs
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ 
 mod quote;
 mod concat_idents;
 mod helpers;
+mod kunit;
 mod module;
 mod pin_data;
 mod pinned_drop;
@@ -246,3 +247,31 @@  pub fn pin_data(inner: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
 pub fn pinned_drop(args: TokenStream, input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
     pinned_drop::pinned_drop(args, input)
 }
+
+/// Registers a KUnit test suite and its test cases using a user-space like syntax.
+///
+/// This macro should be used on modules. If `CONFIG_KUNIT` (in `.config`) is `n`, the target module
+/// is ignored.
+///
+/// # Examples
+///
+/// ```ignore
+/// # use macros::kunit_tests;
+///
+/// #[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]
+/// mod tests {
+///     #[test]
+///     fn foo() {
+///         assert_eq!(1, 1);
+///     }
+///
+///     #[test]
+///     fn bar() {
+///         assert_eq!(2, 2);
+///     }
+/// }
+/// ```
+#[proc_macro_attribute]
+pub fn kunit_tests(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
+    kunit::kunit_tests(attr, ts)
+}