| Message ID | 20230815061546.3556083-2-li.meng@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | AMD Pstate Preferred Core | expand |
On 8/15/2023 01:15, Meng Li wrote: > Drop CPU_SUP_INTE from SCHED_MC_PRIO, and it can be used by X86_AMD_PSTATE. s/CPU_SUP_INTE/CPU_SUP_INTEL/ Also I think this should have a wider description. Something like: "amd-pstate also uses SCHED_MC_PRIO, so decouple the requirement of CPU_SUP_INTEL from the dependencies to allow compilation in kernels without Intel CPU support." > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index e36261b4ea14..03322d2840fa 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -1052,8 +1052,9 @@ config SCHED_MC > > config SCHED_MC_PRIO > bool "CPU core priorities scheduler support" > - depends on SCHED_MC && CPU_SUP_INTEL > + depends on SCHED_MC > select X86_INTEL_PSTATE > + select X86_AMD_PSTATE Thinking about it further I wonder if what we actually want is something like this: select X86_INTEL_PSTATE if CPU_SUP_INTEL select X86_INTEL_PSTATE if CPU_SUP_AMD Then it will work functionally the same for Intel systems but now you can compile the kernel with support for one or both and get the right combination included. > select CPU_FREQ > default y > help
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index e36261b4ea14..03322d2840fa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -1052,8 +1052,9 @@ config SCHED_MC config SCHED_MC_PRIO bool "CPU core priorities scheduler support" - depends on SCHED_MC && CPU_SUP_INTEL + depends on SCHED_MC select X86_INTEL_PSTATE + select X86_AMD_PSTATE select CPU_FREQ default y help
Drop CPU_SUP_INTE from SCHED_MC_PRIO, and it can be used by X86_AMD_PSTATE. Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)