From patchwork Mon Jan 22 16:04:16 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 13525697 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702B463409; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705939471; cv=none; b=jpRZysHbtG5EFghgcMFL49F6TC2b5vnoMdHYLFk4SIi+pvPcBGBHclAoB6AVUkwsAkShhzlgxPA3HSBuz2z3aYucBlbCT/NzdEJi3UTCHdh7SZb/s8ZQv5VRuL/lPDi1bhD6DGTvffgLOkSGKS45ZafvmXRapGSvVZ6IgWgu/lE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705939471; c=relaxed/simple; bh=drSCH2vqjER5uFfaL/EFbAZqdSb/+RdMNKpIpIhecn4=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Ar5LRtg/3lm9Nhf5wHNDIvOWgkgMj9bKKvwyHTa4tadlFW/4rrQXUPnqClJrSn66qjUVPb78EtJ/0AqvpCSGLxq6NLY/AC+AZ6GQT8jhJ4IFRkRDjjAf8RDuUUlV2+e5V3+BV+iu93zl4OMoAH4bVAKZsPfcZYv6LVAiL6MzOZk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pcofZQaJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pcofZQaJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E29EC43390; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:04:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705939471; bh=drSCH2vqjER5uFfaL/EFbAZqdSb/+RdMNKpIpIhecn4=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=pcofZQaJjswkaya1B7aqa8ONUq/WwbpI6+Xw46D5tUEbdiSNnN9cVSbCkDQJJQ1aU lKJsBqc33gaWnbSzIElF8ZKQvjOY8zt2AYabsOaP8qrRRpNO5U459mkdh1h0W7aZ6l gXsRECGAwrVT6DrAk+GfBTxUzKSzOCU+QRMXM4baDBTIOiyoNyf3GEkcU0fVu5Oead M2L4SUmzoxVyz8mTdvsg6iB/E5s+fYk858eejen9piljHxzST+2hbFMQ09gOo5qea7 6cdZ9KCQSeicH3ICjF0kY9mi/Q8aIIagwoMwwSCDkKXbexROKS1sKTBMDr13LJD/QK 6VRCYlOyf1z2A== From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:04:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kselftest/seccomp: Report each expectation we assert as a KTAP test Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240122-b4-kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap-v2-2-aed137eaea41@kernel.org> References: <20240122-b4-kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap-v2-0-aed137eaea41@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240122-b4-kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap-v2-0-aed137eaea41@kernel.org> To: Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Anders Roxell X-Mailer: b4 0.13-dev-5c066 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=5022; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=drSCH2vqjER5uFfaL/EFbAZqdSb/+RdMNKpIpIhecn4=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBlrpIIANr/QODbYott0+MPNEx8QxfMi4WvaG/FAilk Rga98WKJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZa6SCAAKCRAk1otyXVSH0K0QB/ kBMl4FyvfS8KRKzKZ2ALUkyTOfNzgnzNgAEm0VmIfGIsLWeBdftXOfYY2Lc3Iwhn1QEMoslH/qCRVd +Ec1cay6W4Os5fO4xpgG1krUQihvFEQQgpmB8HPEz5O5uwRLOsB0oXibCkcb0XSMOJyKamP2Fufx/9 nOUy2InBk1+O4oZpDC7IpgHc/aBZYgfjE/nuTNJn0ICiQE8R0qtRR/1dO75wPZ7KAsFQOSQwMEdpTc hSVfBY8xmnnzNAwln/4pyqqUtJxMcGherYhV+G23oQDDnaBSK9tIZB1zlxnogvfEqk4R0VLS3jGxzc bhgY0BEN8GKJ90E4LgvtdioyulLlYE X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB The seccomp benchmark test makes a number of checks on the performance it measures and logs them to the output but does so in a custom format which none of the automated test runners understand meaning that the chances that anyone is paying attention are slim. Let's additionally log each result in KTAP format so that automated systems parsing the test output will see each comparison as a test case. The original logs are left in place since they provide the actual numbers for analysis. As part of this rework the flow for the main program so that when we skip tests we still log all the tests we skip, this is because the standard KTAP headers and footers include counts of the number of expected and run tests. Tested-by: Anders Roxell Acked-by: Kees Cook --- .../testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 62 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index 93168dd2c1e3..436a527b8235 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -98,24 +98,36 @@ bool le(int i_one, int i_two) } long compare(const char *name_one, const char *name_eval, const char *name_two, - unsigned long long one, bool (*eval)(int, int), unsigned long long two) + unsigned long long one, bool (*eval)(int, int), unsigned long long two, + bool skip) { bool good; + if (skip) { + ksft_test_result_skip("%s %s %s\n", name_one, name_eval, + name_two); + return 0; + } + ksft_print_msg("\t%s %s %s (%lld %s %lld): ", name_one, name_eval, name_two, (long long)one, name_eval, (long long)two); if (one > INT_MAX) { ksft_print_msg("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)one); - return 1; + good = false; + goto out; } if (two > INT_MAX) { ksft_print_msg("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)two); - return 1; + good = false; + goto out; } good = eval(one, two); printf("%s\n", good ? "✔️" : "❌"); +out: + ksft_test_result(good, "%s %s %s\n", name_one, name_eval, name_two); + return good ? 0 : 1; } @@ -142,9 +154,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) unsigned long long samples, calc; unsigned long long native, filter1, filter2, bitmap1, bitmap2; unsigned long long entry, per_filter1, per_filter2; + bool skip = false; setbuf(stdout, NULL); + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(7); + ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n"); ksft_print_msg(""); system("uname -a"); @@ -202,8 +218,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) #define ESTIMATE(fmt, var, what) do { \ var = (what); \ ksft_print_msg("Estimated " fmt ": %llu ns\n", var); \ - if (var > INT_MAX) \ - goto more_samples; \ + if (var > INT_MAX) { \ + skip = true; \ + ret |= 1; \ + } \ } while (0) ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter", calc, @@ -222,30 +240,34 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) (filter2 - native - entry) / 4); ksft_print_msg("Expectations:\n"); - ret |= compare("native", "≤", "1 bitmap", native, le, bitmap1); - bits = compare("native", "≤", "1 filter", native, le, filter1); + ret |= compare("native", "≤", "1 bitmap", native, le, bitmap1, + skip); + bits = compare("native", "≤", "1 filter", native, le, filter1, + skip); if (bits) - goto more_samples; + skip = true; ret |= compare("per-filter (last 2 diff)", "≈", "per-filter (filters / 4)", - per_filter1, approx, per_filter2); + per_filter1, approx, per_filter2, skip); bits = compare("1 bitmapped", "≈", "2 bitmapped", - bitmap1 - native, approx, bitmap2 - native); + bitmap1 - native, approx, bitmap2 - native, skip); if (bits) { ksft_print_msg("Skipping constant action bitmap expectations: they appear unsupported.\n"); - goto out; + skip = true; } - ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "1 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap1 - native); - ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "2 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap2 - native); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "1 bitmapped", entry, approx, + bitmap1 - native, skip); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "2 bitmapped", entry, approx, + bitmap2 - native, skip); ret |= compare("native + entry + (per filter * 4)", "≈", "4 filters total", - entry + (per_filter1 * 4) + native, approx, filter2); - if (ret == 0) - goto out; + entry + (per_filter1 * 4) + native, approx, filter2, + skip); -more_samples: - ksft_print_msg("Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?\n"); -out: - return 0; + if (ret) { + ksft_print_msg("Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?\n"); + } + + ksft_finished(); }