@@ -62,7 +62,9 @@ int test_wait_fd(int sk, time_t sec, bool write)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- if (getsockopt(sk, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, &ret, &slen) || ret)
+ if (getsockopt(sk, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, &ret, &slen))
+ return -errno;
+ if (ret)
return -ret;
return 0;
}
@@ -584,9 +586,11 @@ int test_client_verify(int sk, const size_t msg_len, const size_t nr,
{
size_t buf_sz = msg_len * nr;
char *buf = alloca(buf_sz);
+ ssize_t ret;
randomize_buffer(buf, buf_sz);
- if (test_client_loop(sk, buf, buf_sz, msg_len, timeout_sec) != buf_sz)
- return -1;
- return 0;
+ ret = test_client_loop(sk, buf, buf_sz, msg_len, timeout_sec);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return (int)ret;
+ return ret != buf_sz ? -1 : 0;
}
@@ -1,10 +1,33 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* Author: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> */
+/*
+ * The test checks that both active and passive reset have correct TCP-AO
+ * signature. An "active" reset (abort) here is procured from closing
+ * listen() socket with non-accepted connections in the queue:
+ * inet_csk_listen_stop() => inet_child_forget() =>
+ * => tcp_disconnect() => tcp_send_active_reset()
+ *
+ * The passive reset is quite hard to get on established TCP connections.
+ * It could be procured from non-established states, but the synchronization
+ * part from userspace in order to reliably get RST seems uneasy.
+ * So, instead it's procured by corrupting SEQ number on TIMED-WAIT state.
+ *
+ * It's important to test both passive and active RST as they go through
+ * different code-paths:
+ * - tcp_send_active_reset() makes no-data skb, sends it with tcp_transmit_skb()
+ * - tcp_v*_send_reset() create their reply skbs and send them with
+ * ip_send_unicast_reply()
+ *
+ * In both cases TCP-AO signatures have to be correct, which is verified by
+ * (1) checking that the TCP-AO connection was reset and (2) TCP-AO counters.
+ *
+ * Author: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
+ */
#include <inttypes.h>
#include "../../../../include/linux/kernel.h"
#include "aolib.h"
const size_t quota = 1000;
+const size_t packet_sz = 100;
/*
* Backlog == 0 means 1 connection in queue, see:
* commit 64a146513f8f ("[NET]: Revert incorrect accept queue...")
@@ -59,26 +82,6 @@ static void close_forced(int sk)
close(sk);
}
-static int test_wait_for_exception(int sk, time_t sec)
-{
- struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = sec };
- struct timeval *ptv = NULL;
- fd_set efds;
- int ret;
-
- FD_ZERO(&efds);
- FD_SET(sk, &efds);
-
- if (sec)
- ptv = &tv;
-
- errno = 0;
- ret = select(sk + 1, NULL, NULL, &efds, ptv);
- if (ret < 0)
- return -errno;
- return ret ? sk : 0;
-}
-
static void test_server_active_rst(unsigned int port)
{
struct tcp_ao_counters cnt1, cnt2;
@@ -155,17 +158,16 @@ static void test_server_passive_rst(unsigned int port)
test_fail("server returned %zd", bytes);
}
- synchronize_threads(); /* 3: chekpoint/restore the connection */
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 3: checkpoint the client */
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 4: close the server, creating twsk */
if (test_get_tcp_ao_counters(sk, &ao2))
test_error("test_get_tcp_ao_counters()");
-
- synchronize_threads(); /* 4: terminate server + send more on client */
- bytes = test_server_run(sk, quota, TEST_RETRANSMIT_SEC);
close(sk);
+
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 5: restore the socket, send more data */
test_tcp_ao_counters_cmp("passive RST server", &ao1, &ao2, TEST_CNT_GOOD);
- synchronize_threads(); /* 5: verified => closed */
- close(sk);
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 6: server exits */
}
static void *server_fn(void *arg)
@@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ static void test_client_active_rst(unsigned int port)
test_error("test_wait_fds(): %d", err);
synchronize_threads(); /* 3: close listen socket */
- if (test_client_verify(sk[0], 100, quota / 100, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC))
+ if (test_client_verify(sk[0], packet_sz, quota / packet_sz, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC))
test_fail("Failed to send data on connected socket");
else
test_ok("Verified established tcp connection");
@@ -323,7 +325,6 @@ static void test_client_passive_rst(unsigned int port)
struct tcp_sock_state img;
sockaddr_af saddr;
int sk, err;
- socklen_t slen = sizeof(err);
sk = socket(test_family, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
if (sk < 0)
@@ -337,18 +338,51 @@ static void test_client_passive_rst(unsigned int port)
test_error("failed to connect()");
synchronize_threads(); /* 2: accepted => send data */
- if (test_client_verify(sk, 100, quota / 100, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC))
+ if (test_client_verify(sk, packet_sz, quota / packet_sz, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC))
test_fail("Failed to send data on connected socket");
else
test_ok("Verified established tcp connection");
- synchronize_threads(); /* 3: chekpoint/restore the connection */
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 3: checkpoint the client */
test_enable_repair(sk);
test_sock_checkpoint(sk, &img, &saddr);
test_ao_checkpoint(sk, &ao_img);
- test_kill_sk(sk);
+ test_disable_repair(sk);
- img.out.seq += quota;
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 4: close the server, creating twsk */
+
+ /*
+ * The "corruption" in SEQ has to be small enough to fit into TCP
+ * window, see tcp_timewait_state_process() for out-of-window
+ * segments.
+ */
+ img.out.seq += 5; /* 5 is more noticeable in tcpdump than 1 */
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: This is kind-of ugly and dirty, but it works.
+ *
+ * At this moment, the server has close'ed(sk).
+ * The passive RST that is being targeted here is new data after
+ * half-duplex close, see tcp_timewait_state_process() => TCP_TW_RST
+ *
+ * What is needed here is:
+ * (1) wait for FIN from the server
+ * (2) make sure that the ACK from the client went out
+ * (3) make sure that the ACK was received and processed by the server
+ *
+ * Otherwise, the data that will be sent from "repaired" socket
+ * post SEQ corruption may get to the server before it's in
+ * TCP_FIN_WAIT2.
+ *
+ * (1) is easy with select()/poll()
+ * (2) is possible by polling tcpi_state from TCP_INFO
+ * (3) is quite complex: as server's socket was already closed,
+ * probably the way to do it would be tcp-diag.
+ */
+ sleep(TEST_RETRANSMIT_SEC);
+
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 5: restore the socket, send more data */
+ test_kill_sk(sk);
sk = socket(test_family, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
if (sk < 0)
@@ -366,25 +400,33 @@ static void test_client_passive_rst(unsigned int port)
test_disable_repair(sk);
test_sock_state_free(&img);
- synchronize_threads(); /* 4: terminate server + send more on client */
- if (test_client_verify(sk, 100, quota / 100, 2 * TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC))
- test_ok("client connection broken post-seq-adjust");
+ /*
+ * This is how "passive reset" is acquired in this test from TCP_TW_RST:
+ *
+ * IP 10.0.254.1.7011 > 10.0.1.1.59772: Flags [P.], seq 901:1001, ack 1001, win 249,
+ * options [tcp-ao keyid 100 rnextkeyid 100 mac 0x10217d6c36a22379086ef3b1], length 100
+ * IP 10.0.254.1.7011 > 10.0.1.1.59772: Flags [F.], seq 1001, ack 1001, win 249,
+ * options [tcp-ao keyid 100 rnextkeyid 100 mac 0x104ffc99b98c10a5298cc268], length 0
+ * IP 10.0.1.1.59772 > 10.0.254.1.7011: Flags [.], ack 1002, win 251,
+ * options [tcp-ao keyid 100 rnextkeyid 100 mac 0xe496dd4f7f5a8a66873c6f93,nop,nop,sack 1 {1001:1002}], length 0
+ * IP 10.0.1.1.59772 > 10.0.254.1.7011: Flags [P.], seq 1006:1106, ack 1001, win 251,
+ * options [tcp-ao keyid 100 rnextkeyid 100 mac 0x1b5f3330fb23fbcd0c77d0ca], length 100
+ * IP 10.0.254.1.7011 > 10.0.1.1.59772: Flags [R], seq 3215596252, win 0,
+ * options [tcp-ao keyid 100 rnextkeyid 100 mac 0x0bcfbbf497bce844312304b2], length 0
+ */
+ err = test_client_verify(sk, packet_sz, quota / packet_sz, 2 * TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+ /* Make sure that the connection was reset, not timeouted */
+ if (err && err == -ECONNRESET)
+ test_ok("client sock was passively reset post-seq-adjust");
+ else if (err)
+ test_fail("client sock was not reset post-seq-adjust: %d", err);
else
- test_fail("client connection still works post-seq-adjust");
-
- test_wait_for_exception(sk, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC);
-
- if (getsockopt(sk, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, &err, &slen))
- test_error("getsockopt()");
- if (err != ECONNRESET && err != EPIPE)
- test_fail("client connection was not reset: %d", err);
- else
- test_ok("client connection was reset");
+ test_fail("client sock is yet connected post-seq-adjust");
if (test_get_tcp_ao_counters(sk, &ao2))
test_error("test_get_tcp_ao_counters()");
- synchronize_threads(); /* 5: verified => closed */
+ synchronize_threads(); /* 6: server exits */
close(sk);
test_tcp_ao_counters_cmp("client passive RST", &ao1, &ao2, TEST_CNT_GOOD);
}
@@ -410,6 +452,6 @@ static void *client_fn(void *arg)
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
- test_init(15, server_fn, client_fn);
+ test_init(14, server_fn, client_fn);
return 0;
}
Currently, the test is racy and seems to not pass anymore. In order to rectify it, aim on TCP_TW_RST. Doesn't seem way too good with this sleep() part, but it seems as a reasonable compromise for the test. There is a plan in-line comment on how-to improve it, going to do it on the top, at this moment I want it to run on netdev/patchwork selftests dashboard. It also slightly changes tcp_ao-lib in order to get SO_ERROR propagated to test_client_verify() return value. Fixes: c6df7b2361d7 ("selftests/net: Add TCP-AO RST test") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/lib/sock.c | 12 ++- tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/rst.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)