@@ -361,11 +361,11 @@ static void do_imc_mem_bw_test(void)
}
/*
- * get_mem_bw_imc - Memory band width as reported by iMC counters
+ * get_mem_bw_imc - Memory bandwidth as reported by iMC counters
* @bw_report: Bandwidth report type (reads, writes)
*
- * Memory B/W utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated using
- * iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
+ * Memory bandwidth utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated
+ * using iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
*
* Return: = 0 on success. < 0 on failure.
*/
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int get_mem_bw_imc(char *bw_report, float *bw_imc)
/*
* Get results which are stored in struct type imc_counter_config
- * Take over flow into consideration before calculating total b/w
+ * Take overflow into consideration before calculating total bandwidth.
*/
for (imc = 0; imc < imcs; imc++) {
struct imc_counter_config *r =
@@ -389,13 +389,13 @@ static int get_mem_bw_imc(char *bw_report, float *bw_imc)
if (read(r->fd, &r->return_value,
sizeof(struct membw_read_format)) == -1) {
- ksft_perror("Couldn't get read b/w through iMC");
+ ksft_perror("Couldn't get read bandwidth through iMC");
goto close_fds;
}
if (read(w->fd, &w->return_value,
sizeof(struct membw_read_format)) == -1) {
- ksft_perror("Couldn't get write bw through iMC");
+ ksft_perror("Couldn't get write bandwidth through iMC");
goto close_fds;
}
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static FILE *open_mem_bw_resctrl(const char *mbm_bw_file)
fp = fopen(mbm_bw_file, "r");
if (!fp)
- ksft_perror("Failed to open total bw file");
+ ksft_perror("Failed to open total memory bandwidth file");
return fp;
}
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report)
if (strcmp(bw_report, "total") == 0)
return 0;
- fprintf(stderr, "Requested iMC B/W report type unavailable\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "Requested iMC bandwidth report type unavailable\n");
return -1;
}
Resctrl selftests refer to "bandwidth" currently in two other forms in the code ("B/W" and "band width"). Use "bandwidth" consistently everywhere. While at it, fix also one "over flow" -> "overflow" on a line that is touched by the change. Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> --- v3: - New patch --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 14 +++++++------- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)