diff mbox series

[2/2] selftests: x86: vdso_restorer: Return correct exit statuses

Message ID 20240712073045.110014-2-usama.anjum@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series [1/2] selftests: x86: vdso_restorer: remove manual counting of pass/fail tests | expand

Commit Message

Muhammad Usama Anjum July 12, 2024, 7:30 a.m. UTC
Return correct exit status, KSFT_SKIP if the pre-conditions aren't met.
Return KSFT_FAIL if error occurs. Use ksft_finished() which will
compmare the total planned tests with passed tests to return the exit
value.

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Shuah Khan July 16, 2024, 10:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Return correct exit status, KSFT_SKIP if the pre-conditions aren't met.
> Return KSFT_FAIL if error occurs. Use ksft_finished() which will
> compmare the total planned tests with passed tests to return the exit
> value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>

Same comment - here. Include before and after output to show
how this change improves the report.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Muhammad Usama Anjum July 18, 2024, 7:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On 7/17/24 3:01 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Return correct exit status, KSFT_SKIP if the pre-conditions aren't met.
>> Return KSFT_FAIL if error occurs. Use ksft_finished() which will
>> compmare the total planned tests with passed tests to return the exit
>> value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> 
> Same comment - here. Include before and after output to show
> how this change improves the report.
Following results have been generated in the case when both tests fail:

# selftests: x86: vdso_restorer_32
# ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so' from
LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64): ignored.
# [RUN]	Raise a signal, SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL
# [FAIL]	SA_SIGINFO handler was not called
# [RUN]	Raise a signal, !SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL
# [FAIL]	!SA_SIGINFO handler was not called
not ok 21 selftests: x86: vdso_restorer_32 # exit=2

# selftests: x86: vdso_restorer_32
# ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so' from
LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64): ignored.
# TAP version 13
# 1..2
# [RUN]	Raise a signal, SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL
# not ok 1 SA_SIGINFO handler returned
# [RUN]	Raise a signal, !SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL
# not ok 2 SA_SIGINFO handler returned
# # Totals: pass:0 fail:2 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 21 selftests: x86: vdso_restorer_32 # exit=1

Please let me know what you think?
> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c
index 8e173d71291f6..54f33e8cda5cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@  int main()
 			      RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_NOLOAD);
 	if (!vdso) {
 		printf("[SKIP]\tFailed to find vDSO.  Tests are not expected to work.\n");
-		return 0;
+		return KSFT_SKIP;
 	}
 
 	ksft_set_plan(2);
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@  int main()
 	printf("[RUN]\tRaise a signal, SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n");
 
 	if (syscall(SYS_rt_sigaction, SIGUSR1, &sa, NULL, 8) != 0)
-		err(1, "raw rt_sigaction syscall");
+		err(KSFT_FAIL, "raw rt_sigaction syscall");
 
 	raise(SIGUSR1);
 
@@ -80,10 +80,12 @@  int main()
 	sa.flags = 0;
 	sa.handler = handler_without_siginfo;
 	if (syscall(SYS_sigaction, SIGUSR1, &sa, 0) != 0)
-		err(1, "raw sigaction syscall");
+		err(KSFT_FAIL, "raw sigaction syscall");
 	handler_called = 0;
 
 	raise(SIGUSR1);
 
 	ksft_test_result(handler_called, "SA_SIGINFO handler returned\n");
+
+	ksft_finished();
 }