@@ -6,20 +6,22 @@
#ifndef _NOLIBC_COMPILER_H
#define _NOLIBC_COMPILER_H
+#if defined(__has_attribute)
+# define __nolibc_has_attribute(attr) __has_attribute(attr)
+#else
+# define __nolibc_has_attribute(attr) 0
+#endif
+
#if defined(__SSP__) || defined(__SSP_STRONG__) || defined(__SSP_ALL__) || defined(__SSP_EXPLICIT__)
#define _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
#endif /* defined(__SSP__) ... */
-#if defined(__has_attribute)
-# if __has_attribute(no_stack_protector)
-# define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((no_stack_protector))
-# else
-# define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))
-# endif
+#if __nolibc_has_attribute(no_stack_protector)
+# define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((no_stack_protector))
#else
# define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))
-#endif /* defined(__has_attribute) */
+#endif /* __nolibc_has_attribute(no_stack_protector) */
#endif /* _NOLIBC_COMPILER_H */
Recent compilers support __has_attribute() to check if a certain compiler attribute is supported. Unfortunately we have to first check if __has_attribute is supported in the first place and then if a specific attribute is present. These two checks can't be folded into a single condition as that would lead to errors. Nesting the two conditions like below works, but becomes ugly as soon as #else blocks are used as those need to be duplicated for both levels of #if. #if defined __has_attribute # if __has_attribute (nonnull) # define ATTR_NONNULL __attribute__ ((nonnull)) # endif #endif Introduce a new helper which makes the usage of __has_attribute() nicer and migrate the current user to it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> --- tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)