@@ -60,16 +60,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_remove_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_
return 0;
}
-int mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
-{
- pr_debug("msk=%p, rm_list_nr=%d", msk, rm_list->nr);
-
- spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, rm_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
/* path manager event handlers */
void mptcp_pm_new_connection(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk, int server_side)
@@ -857,8 +857,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, &msk->pm.rm_list_rx, MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR);
}
-void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
+static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+ const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
{
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list, MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
}
@@ -1471,7 +1471,9 @@ static int mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr(struct net *net,
!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT));
if (remove_subflow) {
- mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(msk, &list);
+ spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
+ mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &list);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
} else if (entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW) {
/* If the subflow has been used, but now closed */
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
@@ -1617,18 +1619,14 @@ static void mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
alist.ids[alist.nr++] = entry->addr.id;
}
+ spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
if (alist.nr) {
- spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
msk->pm.add_addr_signaled -= alist.nr;
mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &alist);
- spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
-
if (slist.nr)
- mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(msk, &slist);
-
+ mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &slist);
/* Reset counters: maybe some subflows have been removed before */
- spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
bitmap_fill(msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
msk->pm.local_addr_used = 0;
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
@@ -1026,7 +1026,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr,
bool echo);
int mptcp_pm_remove_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);
-int mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);
void mptcp_pm_remove_addrs(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct list_head *rm_list);
void mptcp_free_local_addr_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
@@ -1133,8 +1132,6 @@ static inline u8 subflow_get_local_id(const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflo
void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void);
void mptcp_pm_nl_work(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
-void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);
unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
This helper is confusing. It is in pm.c, but it is specific to the in-kernel PM and it cannot be used by the userspace one. Also, it simply calls one in-kernel specific function with the PM lock, while the similar mptcp_pm_remove_addr() helper requires the PM lock. What's left is the pr_debug(), which is not that useful, because a similar one is present in the only function called by this helper: mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received() After these modifications, this helper can be marked as 'static', and the lock can be taken only once in mptcp_pm_flush_addrs_and_subflows(). Note that it is not a bug fix, but it will help backporting the following commits. Fixes: 0ee4261a3681 ("mptcp: implement mptcp_pm_remove_subflow") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> --- net/mptcp/pm.c | 10 ---------- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 16 +++++++--------- net/mptcp/protocol.h | 3 --- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)