From patchwork Wed Oct 9 20:40:34 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Aleksa Sarai X-Patchwork-Id: 13829218 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E8E1E2303; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728506478; cv=none; b=ARwmx1lzrlvMiOX9Xs65cK18p3mElTpQK/fTUxLODhAkXPG4vVTrR0UnADr06aeo6sXFeqxMfrDS4mLUz/FySZObVY6UBQTDXfptm09hcVk4BcRJJn3dDhG/yqrW82JFkjrvk6ecqJ+VD2Pc/zi/nM2es7MH2IPEaqK0M9yLRIY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728506478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fw6NmghdWQJRbb6RKSne5chbZWIJNjzAVYycSf77biE=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=kivOxU8eQFwbFfDwzFxbxWTJ8g5KFCMHesNRiJGS2FbpeLxCXEvS27REcuI/R/PaNaaG5rEkKG5tC/SpX7/3t702lIMoHqYa5RHKAeC6OWuwYorwrtsDU414qNx5qaroHyrSP2IqOZcad5mpvYoJsECOuFBtAa/F+P4X7AS2f20= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cyphar.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cyphar.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cyphar.com header.i=@cyphar.com header.b=d0cusp5a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cyphar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cyphar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cyphar.com header.i=@cyphar.com header.b="d0cusp5a" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XP4Y468Xwz9t71; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 22:41:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cyphar.com; s=MBO0001; t=1728506472; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1P8cNzAS3QpRLvITBT/YZAmoxZc69iafbOErsnmv8M8=; b=d0cusp5aOQS+zxTKsiY9G0oBNEDsP4r+JvUychTD/xubem40zbjVR/80wQyZu2nScva925 rRpzaGPGTPUOsEPvfnFmF+wan2C/PY71r1HeG8atgeB6efo4q1wWezk5i2x/nvcdkDcmtg MkOPsTjPuHbC/J6lGKg7LCzgd6tfQDeKJ6mtgSIvF3FKwmF3mM2OrTasu6GsJ4fFKKcB0d v3HzOFT/TWeJb4Ng73ySvVvR+6BlBEGPlbHqfALx0zN8NTf7tdMlMal8B2pylTV339QqFw t/RTblGjTmY67L2XEYTCqHp5Q9Q3QMAEsUwQ5XgxitYse3EikyUn1OvDO96tLw== From: Aleksa Sarai Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 07:40:34 +1100 Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 01/10] uaccess: add copy_struct_to_user helper Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241010-extensible-structs-check_fields-v3-1-d2833dfe6edd@cyphar.com> References: <20241010-extensible-structs-check_fields-v3-0-d2833dfe6edd@cyphar.com> In-Reply-To: <20241010-extensible-structs-check_fields-v3-0-d2833dfe6edd@cyphar.com> To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Arnd Bergmann , Shuah Khan Cc: Kees Cook , Florian Weimer , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=7216; i=cyphar@cyphar.com; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=fw6NmghdWQJRbb6RKSne5chbZWIJNjzAVYycSf77biE=; b=owGbwMvMwCWmMf3Xpe0vXfIZT6slMaSzvQrcbnDvTVP9j1cv7glL3+eWvKi+6HTI5nyJuZqGG /XKJZ2lO0pZGMS4GGTFFFm2+XmGbpq/+Eryp5VsMHNYmUCGMHBxCsBEbm5j+F98NpFV6tguZcum sy+2rd9wt7thu6T186OfrU00b+svYtFmZJjFJHFNlO3MG9H1S5fovVuXvklLtEk0zffhSr6/kww f32ICAA== X-Developer-Key: i=cyphar@cyphar.com; a=openpgp; fpr=C9C370B246B09F6DBCFC744C34401015D1D2D386 This is based on copy_struct_from_user(), but there is one additional case to consider when creating a syscall that returns an extensible-struct to userspace -- how should data in the struct that cannot fit into the userspace struct be handled (ksize > usize)? There are three possibilies: 1. The interface is like sched_getattr(2), where new information will be silently not provided to userspace. This is probably what most interfaces will want to do, as it provides the most possible backwards-compatibility. 2. The interface is like lsm_list_modules(2), where you want to return an error like -EMSGSIZE if not providing information could result in the userspace program making a serious mistake (such as one that could lead to a security problem) or if you want to provide some flag to userspace so they know that they are missing some information. 3. The interface is like statx(2), where there some kind of a request mask that indicates what data userspace would like. One could imagine that statx2(2) (using extensible structs) would want to return -EMSGSIZE if the user explicitly requested a field that their structure is too small to fit, but not return an error if the field was not explicitly requested. This is kind of a mix between (1) and (2) based on the requested mask. The copy_struct_to_user() helper includes a an extra argument that is used to return a boolean flag indicating whether there was a non-zero byte in the trailing bytes that were not copied to userspace. This can be used in the following ways to handle all three cases, respectively: 1. Just pass NULL, as you don't care about this case. 2. Return an error (say -EMSGSIZE) if the argument was set to true by copy_struct_to_user(). 3. If the argument was set to true by copy_struct_to_user(), check if there is a flag that implies a field larger than usize. This is the only case where callers of copy_struct_to_user() should check usize themselves. This will probably require scanning an array that specifies what flags were added for each version of the flags struct and returning an error if the request mask matches any of the flags that were added in versions of the struct that are larger than usize. At the moment we don't have any users of (3), so this patch doesn't include any helpers to make the necessary scanning easier, but it should be fairly easy to add some if necessary. Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai --- include/linux/uaccess.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h index d8e4105a2f21..cf0994605c10 100644 --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h @@ -387,6 +387,103 @@ copy_struct_from_user(void *dst, size_t ksize, const void __user *src, return 0; } +/** + * copy_struct_to_user: copy a struct to userspace + * @dst: Destination address, in userspace. This buffer must be @ksize + * bytes long. + * @usize: (Alleged) size of @dst struct. + * @src: Source address, in kernel space. + * @ksize: Size of @src struct. + * @ignored_trailing: Set to %true if there was a non-zero byte in @src that + * userspace cannot see because they are using an smaller struct. + * + * Copies a struct from kernel space to userspace, in a way that guarantees + * backwards-compatibility for struct syscall arguments (as long as future + * struct extensions are made such that all new fields are *appended* to the + * old struct, and zeroed-out new fields have the same meaning as the old + * struct). + * + * Some syscalls may wish to make sure that userspace knows about everything in + * the struct, and if there is a non-zero value that userspce doesn't know + * about, they want to return an error (such as -EMSGSIZE) or have some other + * fallback (such as adding a "you're missing some information" flag). If + * @ignored_trailing is non-%NULL, it will be set to %true if there was a + * non-zero byte that could not be copied to userspace (ie. was past @usize). + * + * While unconditionally returning an error in this case is the simplest + * solution, for maximum backward compatibility you should try to only return + * -EMSGSIZE if the user explicitly requested the data that couldn't be copied. + * Note that structure sizes can change due to header changes and simple + * recompilations without code changes(!), so if you care about + * @ignored_trailing you probably want to make sure that any new field data is + * associated with a flag. Otherwise you might assume that a program knows + * about data it does not. + * + * @ksize is just sizeof(*src), and @usize should've been passed by userspace. + * The recommended usage is something like the following: + * + * SYSCALL_DEFINE2(foobar, struct foo __user *, uarg, size_t, usize) + * { + * int err; + * bool ignored_trailing; + * struct foo karg = {}; + * + * if (usize > PAGE_SIZE) + * return -E2BIG; + * if (usize < FOO_SIZE_VER0) + * return -EINVAL; + * + * // ... modify karg somehow ... + * + * err = copy_struct_to_user(uarg, usize, &karg, sizeof(karg), + * &ignored_trailing); + * if (err) + * return err; + * if (ignored_trailing) + * return -EMSGSIZE: + * + * // ... + * } + * + * There are three cases to consider: + * * If @usize == @ksize, then it's copied verbatim. + * * If @usize < @ksize, then the kernel is trying to pass userspace a newer + * struct than it supports. Thus we only copy the interoperable portions + * (@usize) and ignore the rest (but @ignored_trailing is set to %true if + * any of the trailing (@ksize - @usize) bytes are non-zero). + * * If @usize > @ksize, then the kernel is trying to pass userspace an older + * struct than userspace supports. In order to make sure the + * unknown-to-the-kernel fields don't contain garbage values, we zero the + * trailing (@usize - @ksize) bytes. + * + * Returns (in all cases, some data may have been copied): + * * -EFAULT: access to userspace failed. + */ +static __always_inline __must_check int +copy_struct_to_user(void __user *dst, size_t usize, const void *src, + size_t ksize, bool *ignored_trailing) +{ + size_t size = min(ksize, usize); + size_t rest = max(ksize, usize) - size; + + /* Double check if ksize is larger than a known object size. */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ksize > __builtin_object_size(src, 1))) + return -E2BIG; + + /* Deal with trailing bytes. */ + if (usize > ksize) { + if (clear_user(dst + size, rest)) + return -EFAULT; + } + if (ignored_trailing) + *ignored_trailing = ksize < usize && + memchr_inv(src + size, 0, rest) != NULL; + /* Copy the interoperable parts of the struct. */ + if (copy_to_user(dst, src, size)) + return -EFAULT; + return 0; +} + bool copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed(const void *unsafe_src, size_t size); long copy_from_kernel_nofault(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size);