From patchwork Wed Oct 16 20:27:46 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Samuel Holland X-Patchwork-Id: 13838886 Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E2921830D for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.52 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729110509; cv=none; b=rIxLcq7XptMjP/xBI2E8Kw1sYxnSYPgDcoRcdhWb9eLQh4dZxZPmTw2mbF/QHF8kO3CgY3SLh2Pivs4kiyeif5/AW8nKL+Wr51tSX3hoMDnq5bi6kP0IFMXqPKb1h2uhYuBtcKvW7/f1KCRnWCToTK3zHf9kYtZollYC0scNJmA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729110509; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j0p0ED/8LXESHBqg/9/dyKnKtGsz3FrHPIMu2L+0CLI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KKKJPOkirF2lC0eq9ax814B7BjdCuZ2bjE5VKjLx/eM9gjryvgdhQOoJyOVn0l86gHkAWKK1RJVvE2+2HtmZoze50TzTacu8LcTdfYAevwDTvGPhFj0hIDHQ39TKoElpqtGHVwJNZ+TQMr6KcKKS0swyVUSvxPyCUVCGowMJ6uE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=sifive.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sifive.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b=lpEgArYI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sifive.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="lpEgArYI" Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2eb9dde40so180957a91.0 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; t=1729110506; x=1729715306; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5hzxLyRKZWecSXP6tI9h1HTyfXmIADQzaZQzgJ3j2CQ=; b=lpEgArYIAqbkwXPOevuOWZSQnZ4IxGWdAriu2cO5DPYm6GQ6hUd2RmgnaSbrSz2rBc RZjcHRvxRJcd7hR1Sl0PJZCrg34A3pQan6eF/tBRCnd18pDIDt7GRjLUqJHWfehWTo4q Id9rbswBBIo0YDnPWXEk+SDhpi8ZAtr0NJyC9yyup/7YlfAdFD7gZbjTvP6vDOKgz6d7 carE5m4XrgpellLlhEDTncgfZl02RMcT7X7mRYToaJ1BtlQ7BlJUR1SZ6x9OX5P/Krof XLS7YqnCXEwrADy7/m4RRtFVFMd12xQX09mXf1KgvaZkMVnj5mkiOoUlqCwn5jJUsn3+ OhaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729110506; x=1729715306; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5hzxLyRKZWecSXP6tI9h1HTyfXmIADQzaZQzgJ3j2CQ=; b=mRxKfSCPmDPr93ALS024JGBMISgfdbR3A8Q2HHgsiAKVKuclmf2gxSH0et4AFbKATA 98gZmwY//6ZxMPkGLohWwmmezYW28TXTMnz4zr1si17pxnl4HBjLkEBOPuAEjmaNr6QD nrqFIrUxdsf7YZV8G1300Tl2I1iYQfF/P1xZXHxBP9PnvzAn/3Hc/LXV0JZhwdeYr3TL NEq8l9gG09qtFnRYRlTIS/sSYL/pMd0Dlm4RmiTLqoO0f7auf82hZ0hLpwLhTSmvSlD+ WYKKduH3jGsUpxNhxYiKp+264gJNSkifFMLpb/9q82iP+3Nxkv6QwPCE20lcQyCPWgPj FiZw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUgs6m6CgJnSC/CmUTFFbIH0aR1Yr5XHGsYnqIVDfOQnLqbuqAGebGibIjSqr5OYz1bkknniOlt3remO6IfgeM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxWmxm/J/P+RdDW3W9eKOjCXH41WD6hG+6oX/O7/QC0aLwmew6c ad0xjzBmjedeQgQsXp2l8pi6L8r6gmmEYC3E0rH2oKK10CCvg5rll8k/VLPHrL4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFnjAPJU0IcE6m0OnO9BM4DhGT2dYippkidkXhanCK5egb88+8yVh8V5s7oJvYjk8930oXQ7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b8e:b0:2e2:eaa0:7103 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2f0dccf55mr20844968a91.39.1729110506230; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sw06.internal.sifive.com ([4.53.31.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e3e08f8f89sm228613a91.38.2024.10.16.13.28.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:28:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Samuel Holland To: Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Catalin Marinas , Atish Patra , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Shuah Khan , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Evgenii Stepanov , Charlie Jenkins , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Samuel Holland Subject: [PATCH v5 05/10] riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:27:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20241016202814.4061541-6-samuel.holland@sifive.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1 In-Reply-To: <20241016202814.4061541-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com> References: <20241016202814.4061541-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 When pointer masking is enabled for userspace, the kernel can accept tagged pointers as arguments to some system calls. Allow this by untagging the pointers in access_ok() and the uaccess routines. The uaccess routines must peform untagging in software because U-mode and S-mode have entirely separate pointer masking configurations. In fact, hardware may not even implement pointer masking for S-mode. Since the number of tag bits is variable, untagged_addr_remote() needs to know what PMLEN to use for the remote mm. Therefore, the pointer masking mode must be the same for all threads sharing an mm. Enforce this with a lock flag in the mm context, as x86 does for LAM. The flag gets reset in init_new_context() during fork(), as the new mm is no longer multithreaded. Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland --- Changes in v5: - Document that the RISC-V tagged address ABI is the same as AArch64 Changes in v4: - Combine __untagged_addr() and __untagged_addr_remote() Changes in v3: - Use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef when possible - Implement mm_untag_mask() - Remove pmlen from struct thread_info (now only in mm_context_t) Changes in v2: - Implement untagged_addr_remote() - Restrict PMLEN changes once a process is multithreaded Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst | 4 ++ arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h | 7 +++ arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 13 +++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 43 ++++++++++++++-- arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst index ddb8359a46ed..243e40062e34 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst @@ -80,3 +80,7 @@ number of mask/tag bits needed by the application. ``PR_PMLEN`` is interpreted as a lower bound; if the kernel is unable to satisfy the request, the ``PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL`` operation will fail. The actual number of tag bits is returned in ``PR_PMLEN`` by the ``PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL`` operation. + +Additionally, when pointer masking is enabled (``PR_PMLEN`` is greater than 0), +a tagged address ABI is supported, with the same interface and behavior as +documented for AArch64 (Documentation/arch/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst). diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h index c9e03e9da3dc..1cc90465d75b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h @@ -25,9 +25,16 @@ typedef struct { #ifdef CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC unsigned long exec_fdpic_loadmap; unsigned long interp_fdpic_loadmap; +#endif + unsigned long flags; +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM + u8 pmlen; #endif } mm_context_t; +/* Lock the pointer masking mode because this mm is multithreaded */ +#define MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN 0 + #define cntx2asid(cntx) ((cntx) & SATP_ASID_MASK) #define cntx2version(cntx) ((cntx) & ~SATP_ASID_MASK) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h index 7030837adc1a..8c4bc49a3a0f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next) { +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM + next->context.pmlen = 0; +#endif switch_mm(prev, next, NULL); } @@ -30,11 +33,21 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, #ifdef CONFIG_MMU atomic_long_set(&mm->context.id, 0); #endif + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM)) + clear_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &mm->context.flags); return 0; } DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM +#define mm_untag_mask mm_untag_mask +static inline unsigned long mm_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + return -1UL >> mm->context.pmlen; +} +#endif + #include #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h index 72ec1d9bd3f3..fee56b0c8058 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -9,8 +9,41 @@ #define _ASM_RISCV_UACCESS_H #include +#include #include /* for TASK_SIZE */ +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM +static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) +{ + if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPM)) { + u8 pmlen = mm->context.pmlen; + + /* Virtual addresses are sign-extended; physical addresses are zero-extended. */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU)) + return (long)(addr << pmlen) >> pmlen; + else + return (addr << pmlen) >> pmlen; + } + + return addr; +} + +#define untagged_addr(addr) ({ \ + unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \ + (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(current->mm, __addr); \ +}) + +#define untagged_addr_remote(mm, addr) ({ \ + unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \ + mmap_assert_locked(mm); \ + (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(mm, __addr); \ +}) + +#define access_ok(addr, size) likely(__access_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)) +#else +#define untagged_addr(addr) (addr) +#endif + /* * User space memory access functions */ @@ -130,7 +163,7 @@ do { \ */ #define __get_user(x, ptr) \ ({ \ - const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = (ptr); \ + const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = untagged_addr(ptr); \ long __gu_err = 0; \ \ __chk_user_ptr(__gu_ptr); \ @@ -246,7 +279,7 @@ do { \ */ #define __put_user(x, ptr) \ ({ \ - __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = (ptr); \ + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = untagged_addr(ptr); \ __typeof__(*__gu_ptr) __val = (x); \ long __pu_err = 0; \ \ @@ -293,13 +326,13 @@ unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_from_user(void *to, static inline unsigned long raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - return __asm_copy_from_user(to, from, n); + return __asm_copy_from_user(to, untagged_addr(from), n); } static inline unsigned long raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { - return __asm_copy_to_user(to, from, n); + return __asm_copy_to_user(untagged_addr(to), from, n); } extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count); @@ -314,7 +347,7 @@ unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n) { might_fault(); return access_ok(to, n) ? - __clear_user(to, n) : n; + __clear_user(untagged_addr(to), n) : n; } #define __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index 200d2ed64dfe..58b6482c2bf6 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -213,6 +213,10 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) unsigned long tls = args->tls; struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p); + /* Ensure all threads in this mm have the same pointer masking mode. */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM) && p->mm && (clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) + set_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &p->mm->context.flags); + memset(&p->thread.s, 0, sizeof(p->thread.s)); /* p->thread holds context to be restored by __switch_to() */ @@ -258,10 +262,16 @@ enum { static bool have_user_pmlen_7; static bool have_user_pmlen_16; +/* + * Control the relaxed ABI allowing tagged user addresses into the kernel. + */ +static unsigned int tagged_addr_disabled; + long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long arg) { - unsigned long valid_mask = PR_PMLEN_MASK; + unsigned long valid_mask = PR_PMLEN_MASK | PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE; struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(task); + struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm; unsigned long pmm; u8 pmlen; @@ -276,16 +286,41 @@ long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long arg) * in case choosing a larger PMLEN has a performance impact. */ pmlen = FIELD_GET(PR_PMLEN_MASK, arg); - if (pmlen == PMLEN_0) + if (pmlen == PMLEN_0) { pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_0; - else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_7 && have_user_pmlen_7) + } else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_7 && have_user_pmlen_7) { + pmlen = PMLEN_7; pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7; - else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_16 && have_user_pmlen_16) + } else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_16 && have_user_pmlen_16) { + pmlen = PMLEN_16; pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_16; - else + } else { return -EINVAL; + } + + /* + * Do not allow the enabling of the tagged address ABI if globally + * disabled via sysctl abi.tagged_addr_disabled, if pointer masking + * is disabled for userspace. + */ + if (arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE && (tagged_addr_disabled || !pmlen)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!(arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE)) + pmlen = PMLEN_0; + + if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm)) + return -EINTR; + + if (test_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &mm->context.flags) && mm->context.pmlen != pmlen) { + mmap_write_unlock(mm); + return -EBUSY; + } envcfg_update_bits(task, ENVCFG_PMM, pmm); + mm->context.pmlen = pmlen; + + mmap_write_unlock(mm); return 0; } @@ -298,6 +333,10 @@ long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task) if (is_compat_thread(ti)) return -EINVAL; + /* + * The mm context's pmlen is set only when the tagged address ABI is + * enabled, so the effective PMLEN must be extracted from envcfg.PMM. + */ switch (task->thread.envcfg & ENVCFG_PMM) { case ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7: ret = FIELD_PREP(PR_PMLEN_MASK, PMLEN_7); @@ -307,6 +346,9 @@ long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task) break; } + if (task->mm->context.pmlen) + ret |= PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE; + return ret; } @@ -316,6 +358,24 @@ static bool try_to_set_pmm(unsigned long value) return (csr_read_clear(CSR_ENVCFG, ENVCFG_PMM) & ENVCFG_PMM) == value; } +/* + * Global sysctl to disable the tagged user addresses support. This control + * only prevents the tagged address ABI enabling via prctl() and does not + * disable it for tasks that already opted in to the relaxed ABI. + */ + +static struct ctl_table tagged_addr_sysctl_table[] = { + { + .procname = "tagged_addr_disabled", + .mode = 0644, + .data = &tagged_addr_disabled, + .maxlen = sizeof(int), + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax, + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, + }, +}; + static int __init tagged_addr_init(void) { if (!riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPM)) @@ -329,6 +389,9 @@ static int __init tagged_addr_init(void) have_user_pmlen_7 = try_to_set_pmm(ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7); have_user_pmlen_16 = try_to_set_pmm(ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_16); + if (!register_sysctl("abi", tagged_addr_sysctl_table)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; } core_initcall(tagged_addr_init);