From patchwork Tue Oct 29 23:44:17 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13855667 Received: from mail-pg1-f177.google.com (mail-pg1-f177.google.com [209.85.215.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E528212EF7 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.177 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730245504; cv=none; b=KEobCG7cuBxP8QDxywGKxbkYmIOabZHW+PyMu7Rg3fncTOmSKUMnpY8iyFPOiH/EsPowuHC3oaDsQcyv5rL3k42rvvNIZsNBNO7LPtlMyMFTxAteCHHj+N1XiXpC1z3hEHK/zq43eiQhhiDUbiwTDwHsmijTGVEp7FlSqHbD2Eo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730245504; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ad5Fn/9iycXtQ7aeLb/pUVw3HzuYtXusEicZmHD5AZc=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=ceRQENiVU3Lmj7rU59olxZyDVOZ/msqaEfVBiHJHGO86MwlVZgc+lQCKETa8m6rSum7m/BkN/BXjL59M+NFgs715obIdCo3eKeeMkrMC2+lvaOkLato73SIgl32fDZSh1AqXjcBCTK9ErEBTIGBe2sBPLa5dU9ufpc+lg5AC4/I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=Jr21XiAJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Jr21XiAJ" Received: by mail-pg1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7ea76a12c32so4653600a12.1 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1730245501; x=1730850301; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GnRpg73oVkF58mc5nN4qjvbtKg9UllFNYh9JE289A1s=; b=Jr21XiAJjws6XeXIbxbMg6DCxwl7OnMnUaQFK2HZfAukYDwCYmkkvBw1UvyIyIg+BL tUZsf0ocWowwqiPBHPOLAFbOcU9dyQXYGF6ZJq050vjyVnBo41R8Iv8YsFkCyVrTF57P vMW5yGYjJJbJVKzedE7Op5WEZb4GpiT2a3/hnUyiSc3fKVS9cscIcNzUULvcfJZlDmYD eXqeUz+usMFUZ1+AjNKzx+YNti3CVPyp5cI4cw/Ut6nbQ0LkbrEU55Hce5tUD10XKf4b 8fpKBe71B53r2Xx6tl3MUJFME+UImHE0VTs14SXMMqfbMX3I/gNlJ+xCzvhLftsDUXHf S+VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730245501; x=1730850301; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GnRpg73oVkF58mc5nN4qjvbtKg9UllFNYh9JE289A1s=; b=LdenB3gYR6pzEjQjOrUrFfWYmacP1q7T9FMaJrncpiu/IJ3cGlPZCWypmUDcJcrxZ/ jUwfDTakIi9jXVNz/0EMyuCuZQYdoVPMdjb7YBvexP/SpNDYJ1SqEdstBoklS2JV952Q tHxVxCBUDVw4cCfpiPSnrdSqGKTlgf634unOOGmG6lfazHjJDJMATN5DrPELcUL59JiD 9NxMziYaYM//lWHkbMiCPmQLbvymqSsdiN0TPe0ESOAH0MIDqJDEgARRU5J8hr504Mlq nu923jjpKP8zkP3i5xd2VCMCdLET4G4JghMGIILMewqSD9AbmmdMPNalSu0Sf62H5yOV d9Nw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW3jVUK5wsQDXJVRV8l3dQmsFpjqcELHOCTk5FS8EYU1d9Ff8zLHOo1fJkqH9GxJpvGT2PjiaGCcV6Hj06A0oU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzzTbL4ubb2sppM6Menog7p0OjFMFXPxukjw0vIlsa27HrIzS4q cfF7Rtja9E4HxhU4TvOr7gMJ7dxoO1WvZjMyUdKC9etFaRHdxeDgqEQoPm3PuzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGC3Qid8/qIQwFQKJjq9xjWWIqVoJYycU5kLlngrCggKnSEPnv8BOJ9Ejv3TGwjaCoV88BMQg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:e30b:b0:1d9:2a76:e245 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1d9a83cabf0mr17942587637.16.1730245500871; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72057921863sm8157643b3a.33.2024.10.29.16.44.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:44:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v7 17/32] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-17-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> References: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-0-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-0-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Three architectures (x86, aarch64, riscv) have support for indirect branch tracking feature in a very similar fashion. On a very high level, indirect branch tracking is a CPU feature where CPU tracks branches which uses memory operand to perform control transfer in program. As part of this tracking on indirect branches, CPU goes in a state where it expects a landing pad instr on target and if not found then CPU raises some fault (architecture dependent) x86 landing pad instr - `ENDBRANCH` aarch64 landing pad instr - `BTI` riscv landing instr - `lpad` Given that three major arches have support for indirect branch tracking, This patch makes `prctl` for indirect branch tracking arch agnostic. To allow userspace to enable this feature for itself, following prtcls are defined: - PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Gets current configured status for indirect branch tracking. - PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Sets a configuration for indirect branch tracking. Following status options are allowed - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE: Enables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE; Disables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Locks configured status for indirect branch tracking for user thread. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- include/linux/cpu.h | 4 ++++ include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sys.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index bdcec1732445..eff56aae05d7 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -203,4 +203,8 @@ static inline bool cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt(void) } #endif +int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status); +int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status); +int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status); + #endif /* _LINUX_CPU_H_ */ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h index b8d7b6361754..41ffb53490a4 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h @@ -349,4 +349,31 @@ struct prctl_mm_map { */ #define PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS 76 +/* + * Get the current indirect branch tracking configuration for the current + * thread, this will be the value configured via PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS. + */ +#define PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 77 + +/* + * Set the indirect branch tracking configuration. PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE will + * enable cpu feature for user thread, to track all indirect branches and ensure + * they land on arch defined landing pad instruction. + * x86 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `ENDBRANCH` instruction. + * arch64 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `BTI` instruction. + * riscv - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `lpad` instruction. + * PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE will disable feature for user thread and indirect + * branches will no more be tracked by cpu to land on arch defined landing pad + * instruction. + */ +#define PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 78 +# define PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE (1UL << 0) + +/* + * Prevent further changes to the specified indirect branch tracking + * configuration. All bits may be locked via this call, including + * undefined bits. + */ +#define PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 79 + #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */ diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index 3d38a9c7c5c9..dafa31485584 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -2339,6 +2339,21 @@ int __weak arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long st return -EINVAL; } +int __weak arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE) #ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME @@ -2814,6 +2829,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3, return -EINVAL; error = arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(me, arg2); break; + case PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(me, (unsigned long __user *) arg2); + break; + case PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; + case PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; default: error = -EINVAL; break;