From patchwork Mon Nov 11 20:53:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13871291 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02A241CC164 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731358474; cv=none; b=uIFj6svoR35wR2EKR0hdCEu0aa9QHalcE7vgwNbtPj0MY9Y9LjfOCvJiP8B+kmTtMfSTgQhOnSEnU+ZwKOCuZEsbKFbfK6nl9XX4jEUTPEOerj1X/dWNOAM+eqmpMKK9pBT8rZXvRv6bhe6CvZiWvevtESkXUUJPoxuWSg5WPcs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731358474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8ieZNrrEN/UnXHxT5XTWXtI/q5FYLE81gQuhQu8xHpA=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=sXY25pYfLC5VeKOmvDJ/wjbph7sqK02yyy8cI0g8LC9tki9TO2Vcbe4A19qrGnFfkDXtIaPnlbFiPKanpg9h2sqA5zh3EIQdcdK8+nx7o9hpDmTXoWrvB+BSFg/wz0Wls8slT+mKiLXmWmg+guL9syv/picyrCM/bgXMcmaItjM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=bU3Dszpm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="bU3Dszpm" Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2eb9dde40so3997705a91.0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1731358472; x=1731963272; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tXX3HktdfdUDYxlxepoMs9/t12X7ubBzoX+ktyscBn0=; b=bU3DszpmErapDO+xAOOCHpr5kIBJLc4RUBS05PNxNEXFasgiz8AVklzKmwvCDytsIR GsWl0WMILGYJ/m9vgomHSrGkmGJHO0DkhI1sp1SvpvrSrC3VGbnodBlbhc46Nwmeua3j IhhU5g1I81czdoWV0SDIqB6K9SWUtZ8gJHaXhIJSNBI0NYjBn6jSj81FOsjk+m06KctF LlWyqkM0f+0lmFwLM7Ye4rDAL3fcy+Th4OD2FRoHtLHUNDfwTEZquz4QWskXkOHRwhJi MBNoFUKQi59ZDsxq2iajnRGGTIIjRcMRr2eoWZkxOy5SbpBAWK0qvSFhNfEbUvy8kBlz pfYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731358472; x=1731963272; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tXX3HktdfdUDYxlxepoMs9/t12X7ubBzoX+ktyscBn0=; b=qNwgsbM9jW/Z3NykfEEBuHVheM/gqrTQgluSnYVcEtduJ8GhnNUr5uDZ6J7Kp/ya27 4lkwZg9b0U2cgxpyS4UL551NKj7VyJF+zFaOPEOfU6P4ERLqNO4Xle55wJb+dqXfzQ++ pKKiowbZNFfnIWKOHzeUWsHYPKojO5LolJRjJT86soyQWrJvP72sM3RoJHDcz9KGXMxW x2CGD3olUuyAjRZl8Ue8XqqkFKbhMH3BE/7tti8E9yHRvmgsUIphQ3KH38re1dIYnvUe DX5sogknU3y6K2OPzYtXbNaEFUW93ZJP83GhAS7n5Yt+KqLVP5mH60T04UMNQyMxKSxo RxvQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW6oxtLrzDqxFl1B1SEQuZSwfmUR1wLtOjgYqYTPKkrMHvN7Sc8VaHgoJ1Le6bZ9RLuQ09g0EwOnQb4UqiMshc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3O59mbW2tNr8d8PlxWOAvPnc5sUHwhczjfty5Qd3IHJFuyS3A efqH9Vi34PO5idKfDj0gi+xEUxKnzYQGIbohO/gpaXfZmn223R9XdPqUqSXUb6Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHq5Z7Xi/84uV65vfYB2LFlDXOy+r9mzEGPAb0M8IJd9siANoKs1hUvfB42yyVVA4FysR6vOw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:250f:b0:2e2:c421:894b with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9b1682496mr17398074a91.14.1731358472327; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9a5fd1534sm9059974a91.42.2024.11.11.12.54.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:32 -0800 (PST) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:53:59 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 14/29] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-14-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> References: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-0-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-0-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Three architectures (x86, aarch64, riscv) have support for indirect branch tracking feature in a very similar fashion. On a very high level, indirect branch tracking is a CPU feature where CPU tracks branches which uses memory operand to perform control transfer in program. As part of this tracking on indirect branches, CPU goes in a state where it expects a landing pad instr on target and if not found then CPU raises some fault (architecture dependent) x86 landing pad instr - `ENDBRANCH` aarch64 landing pad instr - `BTI` riscv landing instr - `lpad` Given that three major arches have support for indirect branch tracking, This patch makes `prctl` for indirect branch tracking arch agnostic. To allow userspace to enable this feature for itself, following prtcls are defined: - PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Gets current configured status for indirect branch tracking. - PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Sets a configuration for indirect branch tracking. Following status options are allowed - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE: Enables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE; Disables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Locks configured status for indirect branch tracking for user thread. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- include/linux/cpu.h | 4 ++++ include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sys.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index bdcec1732445..eff56aae05d7 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -203,4 +203,8 @@ static inline bool cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt(void) } #endif +int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status); +int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status); +int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status); + #endif /* _LINUX_CPU_H_ */ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h index c42ed44e86bc..8afd5cb70237 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h @@ -352,4 +352,31 @@ struct prctl_mm_map { */ #define PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS 76 +/* + * Get the current indirect branch tracking configuration for the current + * thread, this will be the value configured via PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS. + */ +#define PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 77 + +/* + * Set the indirect branch tracking configuration. PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE will + * enable cpu feature for user thread, to track all indirect branches and ensure + * they land on arch defined landing pad instruction. + * x86 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `ENDBRANCH` instruction. + * arch64 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `BTI` instruction. + * riscv - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `lpad` instruction. + * PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE will disable feature for user thread and indirect + * branches will no more be tracked by cpu to land on arch defined landing pad + * instruction. + */ +#define PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 78 +# define PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE (1UL << 0) + +/* + * Prevent further changes to the specified indirect branch tracking + * configuration. All bits may be locked via this call, including + * undefined bits. + */ +#define PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 79 + #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */ diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index 3d38a9c7c5c9..dafa31485584 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -2339,6 +2339,21 @@ int __weak arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long st return -EINVAL; } +int __weak arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE) #ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME @@ -2814,6 +2829,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3, return -EINVAL; error = arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(me, arg2); break; + case PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(me, (unsigned long __user *) arg2); + break; + case PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; + case PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error = arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; default: error = -EINVAL; break;