From patchwork Mon Nov 11 20:54:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13871298 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F441D0BA4 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731358494; cv=none; b=gUEipm6Mfg1xvudkMsnIwdML1LS99gT0v/GpBk0uov/K3dETyepoJcoIGN0iUbnh1O4FhCkGTn5T1843H1cac8xqTSdABA5FckSdCrpXU+jbItCaD2VwjTqlme8UG6G40U1FlaNl73s9PnKQseG20GzNlrvwxJmSLSI/xQNFc3Y= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731358494; c=relaxed/simple; bh=elnZdSg/Mdhx+oWdO+BSn6cOeDcANRVDvLp/buCG2zA=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=VHUeKA5FWKwS33h9MS7NcnSjdBQIjOJS4vebPTdt5NhbBipFazFTHmvv7eueC188BD5yghGdTnAH9wsbZzrvkfDM6dOI7x5ETYcuBpP3yFyobzoBW2trVotacUeULl5s/fqcCjVtHP/ZUs9IzB+ISSAVmE4lp3jaU6hSudMWk24= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=iVsXNAyw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="iVsXNAyw" Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7f3f1849849so3350468a12.1 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1731358492; x=1731963292; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GP0I58BLUE60FYcCdRZWgegjor4Rhw7u4n7VUbDEgHI=; b=iVsXNAywoOdkF7drOZaiOSlrn/rssX89UXZMC+6oak+N3bo2qb9Lf5/hA0mO2SDL78 0rCc3wqfqEXAaLU/k0yWh8oEia5/FAXInbAwCyb+2r4Q9YZ/ywwokXO4iAmrhBddMCqx 0616AHIw/TacVHbKsRMdNSoDgHVVYhZzA1mFGkEoAdpslwiOH47POucEeoMRMgbkFThe MGX4I4QMOYaneUW6uznDeayj6itYpbHVHo05PIb+kBJC9OaRNoiZjFjp+JqaNdsSqK0c xubmy7eBnZ89zH2rntZ9oC9wFrkvprU5oymAA+2VcFU7lYqSpGrowei/d9iZj3bvxHbZ /svQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731358492; x=1731963292; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GP0I58BLUE60FYcCdRZWgegjor4Rhw7u4n7VUbDEgHI=; b=tm4petWyTw5pvQ5CXw9G5DKZTHna4rd8gnCHZYCfvEzgAUu/OrJ3TLBQfLcsgt8rWN 4ZTMjNJNSkA6Msty/dvVYvnKMlVToXlm/0aNbNmTOvSSyCeBeXhGU8JwTOswHRxXIHy9 ABSPcvtnW1BfPwYghI6amrxrUeEsnRx7FA05AcVIImoHN9VlnKff6B2jCoHCb/VPGX1W u2MycvDgZ7G0A2LUgBj5qVFDPD1bUogbFmpd2U5Fx0gRD07qLZNHVlOflX7GHVwXOy5+ RoOhiDWL+d7eX8AVKxNd3CgNZfO7a2RDjwxkGdeM4rM0Szil/zsceYflmfboREMuwO/j zWZw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWhYTiaOPCmBp3/dJJofo0EQYKOpsZPtPVMBPDw4/AKj9CsYaZLX4rI8UnRRpqWmDmYuZr+Nrp2N5HV2k/zWb4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyvK0LFAX+J6BOl20jYcDxRq053lMgUjn0jgmVHuP8IxYmoquCA wyLTZg8IAFQf0lTOJcFf+lKIAW2aTe8/BRxOohJHD40UNDaqhdVgGN0UJL7rIAY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEIBfOZ1jmuiPm63k8prxDErgx1l4b0Xg9s/9vxhWpYcoduBzr4Dyzk8y8uGrWaFpzc99rxZg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a49:b0:2e2:92dc:6fd4 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9e4c73b28mr403622a91.23.1731358491799; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9a5fd1534sm9059974a91.42.2024.11.11.12.54.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:51 -0800 (PST) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:54:06 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 21/29] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-21-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> References: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-0-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20241111-v5_user_cfi_series-v8-0-dce14aa30207@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Expose a new register type NT_RISCV_USER_CFI for risc-v cfi status and state. Intentionally both landing pad and shadow stack status and state are rolled into cfi state. Creating two different NT_RISCV_USER_XXX would not be useful and wastage of a note type. Enabling or disabling of feature is not allowed via ptrace set interface. However setting `elp` state or setting shadow stack pointer are allowed via ptrace set interface. It is expected `gdb` might have use to fixup `elp` state or `shadow stack` pointer. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 18 ++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h index 659ea3af5680..e6571fba8a8a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h @@ -131,6 +131,24 @@ struct __sc_riscv_cfi_state { unsigned long ss_ptr; /* shadow stack pointer */ }; +struct __cfi_status { + /* indirect branch tracking state */ + __u64 lp_en : 1; + __u64 lp_lock : 1; + __u64 elp_state : 1; + + /* shadow stack status */ + __u64 shstk_en : 1; + __u64 shstk_lock : 1; + + __u64 rsvd : sizeof(__u64) - 5; +}; + +struct user_cfi_state { + struct __cfi_status cfi_status; + __u64 shstk_ptr; +}; + #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_RISCV_PTRACE_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c index ea67e9fb7a58..1c546c01715e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include enum riscv_regset { REGSET_X, @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ enum riscv_regset { #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM REGSET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + REGSET_CFI, +#endif }; static int riscv_gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, @@ -184,6 +188,75 @@ static int tagged_addr_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *target, } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI +static int riscv_cfi_get(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + struct membuf to) +{ + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_en = is_indir_lp_enabled(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_lock = is_indir_lp_locked(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.elp_state = (regs->status & SR_ELP); + + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_en = is_shstk_enabled(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_lock = is_shstk_locked(target); + user_cfi.shstk_ptr = get_active_shstk(target); + + return membuf_write(&to, &user_cfi, sizeof(user_cfi)); +} + +/* + * Does it make sense to allowing enable / disable of cfi via ptrace? + * Not allowing enable / disable / locking control via ptrace for now. + * Setting shadow stack pointer is allowed. GDB might use it to unwind or + * some other fixup. Similarly gdb might want to suppress elp and may want + * to reset elp state. + */ +static int riscv_cfi_set(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, + const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf) +{ + int ret; + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, &user_cfi, 0, -1); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* + * Not allowing enabling or locking shadow stack or landing pad + * There is no disabling of shadow stack or landing pad via ptrace + * rsvd field should be set to zero so that if those fields are needed in future + */ + if (user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_en || user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_lock || + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_en || user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_lock || + !user_cfi.cfi_status.rsvd) + return -EINVAL; + + /* If lpad is enabled on target and ptrace requests to set / clear elp, do that */ + if (is_indir_lp_enabled(target)) { + if (user_cfi.cfi_status.elp_state) /* set elp state */ + regs->status |= SR_ELP; + else + regs->status &= ~SR_ELP; /* clear elp state */ + } + + /* If shadow stack enabled on target, set new shadow stack pointer */ + if (is_shstk_enabled(target)) + set_active_shstk(target, user_cfi.shstk_ptr); + + return 0; +} +#endif + static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { [REGSET_X] = { .core_note_type = NT_PRSTATUS, @@ -224,6 +297,16 @@ static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { .set = tagged_addr_ctrl_set, }, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + [REGSET_CFI] = { + .core_note_type = NT_RISCV_USER_CFI, + .align = sizeof(__u64), + .n = sizeof(struct user_cfi_state) / sizeof(__u64), + .size = sizeof(__u64), + .regset_get = riscv_cfi_get, + .set = riscv_cfi_set, + }, +#endif }; static const struct user_regset_view riscv_user_native_view = { diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h index a920cf8934dc..83d16bc61709 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ typedef struct elf64_shdr { #define NT_RISCV_CSR 0x900 /* RISC-V Control and Status Registers */ #define NT_RISCV_VECTOR 0x901 /* RISC-V vector registers */ #define NT_RISCV_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 0x902 /* RISC-V tagged address control (prctl()) */ +#define NT_RISCV_USER_CFI 0x903 /* RISC-V shadow stack state */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_CPUCFG 0xa00 /* LoongArch CPU config registers */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_CSR 0xa01 /* LoongArch control and status registers */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_LSX 0xa02 /* LoongArch Loongson SIMD Extension registers */