| Message ID | 31680D47D9533D91+20230904023236.GA12494@xgk8823 (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 474d9f32766a104fc8703c9a76815769139edd60 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/1] tools/testing/selftests/iommu:Fixed spelling errors in comments | expand |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:32:36AM +0800, GuokaiXu wrote: > From c4e404036e0a7ffcaedc5760bee234713ccfe4a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: GuokaiXu <xuguokai@ucas.com.cn> > Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 10:18:04 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix the spelling errors in comments > > Signed-off-by: GuokaiXu <xuguokai@ucas.com.cn> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied to for-next, thanks Jason
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c index 33d08600be13..b7249ffc6750 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ TEST_F(vfio_compat_mock_domain, map) ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap_cmd)); ASSERT_EQ(BUFFER_SIZE, unmap_cmd.size); - /* UNMAP_FLAG_ALL requres 0 iova/size */ + /* UNMAP_FLAG_ALL requires 0 iova/size */ ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA, &map_cmd)); unmap_cmd.flags = VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL; EXPECT_ERRNO(EINVAL, ioctl(self->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap_cmd)); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c index a220ca2a689d..36e7aa4f615c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static bool fail_nth_next(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, /* * This is just an arbitrary limit based on the current kernel - * situation. Changes in the kernel can dramtically change the number of + * situation. Changes in the kernel can dramatically change the number of * required fault injection sites, so if this hits it doesn't * necessarily mean a test failure, just that the limit has to be made * bigger.