@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ Yes, well, mostly.
For the most part, the KUnit core framework (what you use to write the tests)
can compile to any architecture; it compiles like just another part of the
-kernel and runs when the kernel boots. However, there is some infrastructure,
+kernel and runs when the kernel boots, or when built as a module, when the
+module is loaded. However, there is some infrastructure,
like the KUnit Wrapper (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that does not support
other architectures.
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ to a standalone program that can be run like any other program directly inside
of a host operating system; to be clear, it does not require any virtualization
support; it is just a regular program.
+Alternatively, kunit and kunit tests can be built as modules and tests will
+run when the test module is loaded.
+
KUnit is fast. Excluding build time, from invocation to completion KUnit can run
several dozen tests in only 10 to 20 seconds; this might not sound like a big
deal to some people, but having such fast and easy to run tests fundamentally
@@ -539,6 +539,22 @@ Interspersed in the kernel logs you might see the following:
Congratulations, you just ran a KUnit test on the x86 architecture!
+In a similar manner, kunit and kunit tests can also be built as modules,
+so if you wanted to run tests in this way you might add the following config
+options to your ``.config``:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+ CONFIG_KUNIT=m
+ CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m
+
+Once the kernel is built and installed, a simple
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+ modprobe example-test
+
+...will run the tests.
+
Writing new tests for other architectures
-----------------------------------------
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ config DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE
config PM_QOS_KUNIT_TEST
bool "KUnit Test for PM QoS features"
- depends on KUNIT
+ depends on KUNIT=y
config HMEM_REPORTING
bool
@@ -114,4 +114,4 @@ static struct kunit_suite pm_qos_test_module = {
.name = "qos-kunit-test",
.test_cases = pm_qos_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(pm_qos_test_module);
+kunit_test_suites(&pm_qos_test_module);
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG
echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug
config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS
- bool "KUnit tests for ext4"
+ tristate "KUnit tests for ext4"
select EXT4_FS
depends on KUNIT
help
@@ -13,5 +13,6 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \
ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o
ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o
-ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o
+ext4-inode-test-objs += inode-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += ext4-inode-test.o
ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o
@@ -269,4 +269,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = {
.test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&ext4_inode_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
@@ -9,10 +9,11 @@
#ifndef _KUNIT_ASSERT_H
#define _KUNIT_ASSERT_H
-#include <kunit/string-stream.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
struct kunit;
+struct string_stream;
/**
* enum kunit_assert_type - Type of expectation/assertion.
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <kunit/assert.h>
#include <kunit/try-catch.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -197,31 +198,47 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name);
int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
/**
- * kunit_test_suite() - used to register a &struct kunit_suite with KUnit.
+ * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
+ * with KUnit.
*
- * @suite: a statically allocated &struct kunit_suite.
+ * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
*
- * Registers @suite with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
+ * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
* more information.
*
- * NOTE: Currently KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
+ * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
* that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init
* phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit
* cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase;
* another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in
* an earlier init phase.
*
+ * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules
+ * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an
+ * array of suites for a module.
+ *
* TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as
* late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit
* tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after
* everything else is definitely initialized.
*/
-#define kunit_test_suite(suite) \
- static int kunit_suite_init##suite(void) \
- { \
- return kunit_run_tests(&suite); \
- } \
- late_initcall(kunit_suite_init##suite)
+#define kunit_test_suites(...) \
+ static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \
+ static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \
+ { \
+ unsigned int i; \
+ for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) \
+ kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); \
+ return 0; \
+ } \
+ late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \
+ static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \
+ { \
+ return; \
+ } \
+ module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit)
+
+#define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite)
/*
* Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource
@@ -53,11 +53,6 @@ struct kunit_try_catch {
void *context;
};
-void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
- struct kunit *test,
- kunit_try_catch_func_t try,
- kunit_try_catch_func_t catch);
-
void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context);
void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch);
@@ -67,9 +62,4 @@ static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)
return try_catch->try_result;
}
-/*
- * Exposed for testing only.
- */
-void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch);
-
#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */
@@ -389,4 +389,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite sysctl_test_suite = {
.test_cases = sysctl_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(sysctl_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&sysctl_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
@@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ config TEST_SYSCTL
If unsure, say N.
config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
- bool "KUnit test for sysctl"
+ tristate "KUnit test for sysctl"
depends on KUNIT
help
This builds the proc sysctl unit test, which runs on boot.
@@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
If unsure, say N.
config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
- bool "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures"
+ tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures"
depends on KUNIT
help
This builds the linked list KUnit test suite.
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#
menuconfig KUNIT
- bool "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests"
+ tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests"
help
Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit
testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ menuconfig KUNIT
if KUNIT
config KUNIT_TEST
- bool "KUnit test for KUnit"
+ tristate "KUnit test for KUnit"
help
Enables the unit tests for the KUnit test framework. These tests test
the KUnit test framework itself; the tests are both written using
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ config KUNIT_TEST
expected.
config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST
- bool "Example test for KUnit"
+ tristate "Example test for KUnit"
help
Enables an example unit test that illustrates some of the basic
features of KUnit. This test only exists to help new users understand
@@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o
+
+kunit-objs += test.o \
string-stream.o \
assert.o \
try-catch.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += test-test.o \
- string-stream-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o
+
+# string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o
+endif
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST) += example-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST) += kunit-example-test.o
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
*/
#include <kunit/assert.h>
+#include "string-stream.h"
+
void kunit_base_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
{
@@ -24,6 +26,7 @@ void kunit_base_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
string_stream_add(stream, "%s FAILED at %s:%d\n",
expect_or_assert, assert->file, assert->line);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_base_assert_format);
void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -31,6 +34,7 @@ void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
if (assert->message.fmt)
string_stream_add(stream, "\n%pV", &assert->message);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_assert_print_msg);
void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -38,6 +42,7 @@ void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
string_stream_add(stream, "%pV", &assert->message);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_fail_assert_format);
void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -56,6 +61,7 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
unary_assert->condition);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_unary_assert_format);
void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -76,6 +82,7 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
}
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -97,6 +104,7 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -118,6 +126,7 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -139,3 +148,4 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format);
similarity index 97%
rename from lib/kunit/example-test.c
rename to lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
@@ -85,4 +85,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = {
* This registers the above test suite telling KUnit that this is a suite of
* tests that need to be run.
*/
-kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&example_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
similarity index 98%
rename from lib/kunit/test-test.c
rename to lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
*/
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include "try-catch-impl.h"
+
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context {
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch;
bool function_called;
@@ -100,7 +102,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = {
.init = kunit_try_catch_test_init,
.test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(kunit_try_catch_test_suite);
/*
* Context for testing test managed resources
@@ -328,4 +329,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
.exit = kunit_resource_test_exit,
.test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(kunit_resource_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
* Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
*/
-#include <kunit/string-stream.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include "string-stream.h"
+
static void string_stream_test_empty_on_creation(struct kunit *test)
{
struct string_stream *stream = alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -49,4 +50,4 @@ static struct kunit_suite string_stream_test_suite = {
.name = "string-stream-test",
.test_cases = string_stream_test_cases
};
-kunit_test_suite(string_stream_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&string_stream_test_suite);
@@ -6,11 +6,12 @@
* Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
*/
-#include <kunit/string-stream.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include "string-stream.h"
+
struct string_stream_fragment_alloc_context {
struct kunit *test;
int len;
similarity index 100%
rename from include/kunit/string-stream.h
rename to lib/kunit/string-stream.h
@@ -7,10 +7,12 @@
*/
#include <kunit/test.h>
-#include <kunit/try-catch.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
+#include "string-stream.h"
+#include "try-catch-impl.h"
+
static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
{
WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false);
@@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ void kunit_do_assertion(struct kunit *test,
if (assert->type == KUNIT_ASSERTION)
kunit_abort(test);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_do_assertion);
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name)
{
@@ -179,6 +182,7 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name)
test->name = name;
test->success = true;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test);
/*
* Initializes and runs test case. Does not clean up or do post validations.
@@ -317,6 +321,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test,
kunit_resource_init_t init,
@@ -342,6 +347,7 @@ struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test,
return res;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_alloc_and_get_resource);
static void kunit_resource_free(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res)
{
@@ -400,6 +406,7 @@ int kunit_resource_destroy(struct kunit *test,
kunit_resource_free(test, resource);
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_resource_destroy);
struct kunit_kmalloc_params {
size_t size;
@@ -435,6 +442,7 @@ void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
gfp,
¶ms);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kmalloc);
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
{
@@ -447,6 +455,7 @@ void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
WARN_ON(rc);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
{
@@ -476,3 +485,17 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
kunit_resource_free(test, resource);
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup);
+
+static int __init kunit_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(kunit_init);
+
+static void __exit kunit_exit(void)
+{
+}
+module_exit(kunit_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Internal kunit try catch implementation to be shared with tests.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
+ * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_IMPL_H
+#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_IMPL_H
+
+#include <kunit/try-catch.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct kunit;
+
+static inline void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
+ struct kunit *test,
+ kunit_try_catch_func_t try,
+ kunit_try_catch_func_t catch)
+{
+ try_catch->test = test;
+ try_catch->try = try;
+ try_catch->catch = catch;
+}
+
+#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_IMPL_H */
@@ -8,17 +8,18 @@
*/
#include <kunit/test.h>
-#include <kunit/try-catch.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
-#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
+
+#include "try-catch-impl.h"
void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)
{
try_catch->try_result = -EFAULT;
complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, -EFAULT);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_throw);
static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data)
{
@@ -31,8 +32,6 @@ static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data)
static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void)
{
- unsigned long timeout_msecs;
-
/*
* TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): We should probably have some type of
* variable timeout here. The only question is what that timeout value
@@ -49,22 +48,11 @@ static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void)
*
* For more background on this topic, see:
* https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html
+ *
+ * If tests timeout due to exceeding sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs,
+ * the task will be killed and an oops generated.
*/
- if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) {
- /*
- * If sysctl_hung_task is active, just set the timeout to some
- * value less than that.
- *
- * In regards to the above TODO, if we decide on variable
- * timeouts, this logic will likely need to change.
- */
- timeout_msecs = (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs - 1) *
- MSEC_PER_SEC;
- } else {
- timeout_msecs = 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */
- }
-
- return timeout_msecs;
+ return 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */
}
void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context)
@@ -106,13 +94,4 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context)
try_catch->catch(try_catch->context);
}
-
-void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
- struct kunit *test,
- kunit_try_catch_func_t try,
- kunit_try_catch_func_t catch)
-{
- try_catch->test = test;
- try_catch->try = try;
- try_catch->catch = catch;
-}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_run);
@@ -743,4 +743,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite list_test_module = {
.test_cases = list_test_cases,
};
-kunit_test_suite(list_test_module);
+kunit_test_suites(&list_test_module);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
@@ -68,3 +68,19 @@ config SECURITY_APPARMOR_DEBUG_MESSAGES
Set the default value of the apparmor.debug kernel parameter.
When enabled, various debug messages will be logged to
the kernel message buffer.
+
+config SECURITY_APPARMOR_KUNIT_TEST
+ bool "Build KUnit tests for policy_unpack.c"
+ depends on KUNIT=y && SECURITY_APPARMOR
+ help
+ This builds the AppArmor KUnit tests.
+
+ KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug log
+ in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devs
+ running KUnit test harness and are not for inclusion into a
+ production build.
+
+ For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
+ to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
@@ -1228,3 +1228,7 @@ int aa_unpack(struct aa_loaddata *udata, struct list_head *lh,
return error;
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_KUNIT_TEST
+#include "policy_unpack_test.c"
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_KUNIT_TEST */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,607 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for AppArmor's policy unpack.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include "include/policy.h"
+#include "include/policy_unpack.h"
+
+#define TEST_STRING_NAME "TEST_STRING"
+#define TEST_STRING_DATA "testing"
+#define TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (3 + strlen(TEST_STRING_NAME) + 1)
+
+#define TEST_U32_NAME "U32_TEST"
+#define TEST_U32_DATA ((u32)0x01020304)
+#define TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET + 3 + strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1)
+#define TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1)
+
+#define TEST_U16_OFFSET (TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + 3)
+#define TEST_U16_DATA ((u16)(TEST_U32_DATA >> 16))
+
+#define TEST_U64_NAME "U64_TEST"
+#define TEST_U64_DATA ((u64)0x0102030405060708)
+#define TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET (TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) + 1)
+#define TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1)
+
+#define TEST_BLOB_NAME "BLOB_TEST"
+#define TEST_BLOB_DATA "\xde\xad\x00\xbe\xef"
+#define TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE (ARRAY_SIZE(TEST_BLOB_DATA))
+#define TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET (TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u64) + 1)
+#define TEST_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 1)
+
+#define TEST_ARRAY_NAME "ARRAY_TEST"
+#define TEST_ARRAY_SIZE 16
+#define TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET + 5 + TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE)
+#define TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET \
+ (TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1)
+
+struct policy_unpack_fixture {
+ struct aa_ext *e;
+ size_t e_size;
+};
+
+struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
+ struct kunit *test, size_t buf_size)
+{
+ char *buf;
+ struct aa_ext *e;
+
+ buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, buf_size, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
+
+ e = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*e), GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, e);
+
+ e->start = buf;
+ e->end = e->start + buf_size;
+ e->pos = e->start;
+
+ *buf = AA_NAME;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_STRING_NAME) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+
+ buf = e->start + TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET;
+ *buf = AA_STRING;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_DATA);
+
+ buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+ *buf = AA_NAME;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME);
+ *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32;
+ *((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA;
+
+ buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
+ *buf = AA_NAME;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME);
+ *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64;
+ *((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA;
+
+ buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
+ *buf = AA_NAME;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_BLOB_NAME);
+ *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 1) = AA_BLOB;
+ *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 2) = TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE;
+ memcpy(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 6,
+ TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);
+
+ buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET;
+ *buf = AA_NAME;
+ *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1;
+ strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME);
+ *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY;
+ *((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE;
+
+ return e;
+}
+
+static int policy_unpack_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ size_t e_size = TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u16) + 1;
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf;
+
+ puf = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*puf), GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, puf);
+
+ puf->e_size = e_size;
+ puf->e = build_aa_ext_struct(puf, test, e_size);
+
+ test->priv = puf;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_inbounds_when_inbounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, inbounds(puf->e, 0));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, inbounds(puf->e, puf->e_size / 2));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, inbounds(puf->e, puf->e_size));
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_inbounds_when_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, inbounds(puf->e, puf->e_size + 1));
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ u16 array_size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)TEST_ARRAY_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u16) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_ARRAY_NAME;
+ u16 array_size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)TEST_ARRAY_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u16) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_ARRAY_NAME;
+ u16 array_size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET;
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->start + TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u16);
+
+ array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *blob = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
+ size = unpack_blob(puf->e, &blob, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
+ memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *blob = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
+ size = unpack_blob(puf->e, &blob, TEST_BLOB_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
+ memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *blob = NULL;
+ void *start;
+ int size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
+ start = puf->e->pos;
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->start + TEST_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET
+ + TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE - 1;
+
+ size = unpack_blob(puf->e, &blob, TEST_BLOB_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char *string = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET;
+ size = unpack_str(puf->e, &string, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, string, TEST_STRING_DATA);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char *string = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ size = unpack_str(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, string, TEST_STRING_DATA);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char *string = NULL;
+ void *start = puf->e->pos;
+ int size;
+
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->pos + TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET
+ + strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) - 1;
+
+ size = unpack_str(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *string = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET;
+ size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test,
+ ((uintptr_t)puf->e->start <= (uintptr_t)string)
+ && ((uintptr_t)string <= (uintptr_t)puf->e->end));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, string, TEST_STRING_DATA);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *string = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test,
+ ((uintptr_t)puf->e->start <= (uintptr_t)string)
+ && ((uintptr_t)string <= (uintptr_t)puf->e->end));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, string, TEST_STRING_DATA);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ void *start = puf->e->pos;
+ char *string = NULL;
+ int size;
+
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->pos + TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET
+ + strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) - 1;
+
+ size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, (char *)NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_nameX(puf->e, AA_U32, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_wrong_code(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_nameX(puf->e, AA_BLOB, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_U32_NAME;
+ bool success;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_nameX(puf->e, AA_U32, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_wrong_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ static const char name[] = "12345678";
+ bool success;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_nameX(puf->e, AA_U32, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *chunk = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U16_OFFSET;
+ /*
+ * WARNING: For unit testing purposes, we're pushing puf->e->end past
+ * the end of the allocated memory. Doing anything other than comparing
+ * memory addresses is dangerous.
+ */
+ puf->e->end += TEST_U16_DATA;
+
+ size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (void *)chunk,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET + 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)TEST_U16_DATA);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (void *)(chunk + TEST_U16_DATA));
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *chunk = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos = puf->e->end - 1;
+
+ size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->end - 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_2(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ char *chunk = NULL;
+ size_t size;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U16_OFFSET;
+ /*
+ * WARNING: For unit testing purposes, we're pushing puf->e->end past
+ * the end of the allocated memory. Doing anything other than comparing
+ * memory addresses is dangerous.
+ */
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->pos + TEST_U16_DATA - 1;
+
+ size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success;
+ u32 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_u32(puf->e, &data, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data, TEST_U32_DATA);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_U32_NAME;
+ bool success;
+ u32 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_u32(puf->e, &data, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data, TEST_U32_DATA);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_U32_NAME;
+ bool success;
+ u32 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->start + TEST_U32_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u32);
+
+ success = unpack_u32(puf->e, &data, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_with_null_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success;
+ u64 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_u64(puf->e, &data, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data, TEST_U64_DATA);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u64) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_with_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_U64_NAME;
+ bool success;
+ u64 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
+
+ success = unpack_u64(puf->e, &data, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data, TEST_U64_DATA);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u64) + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ const char name[] = TEST_U64_NAME;
+ bool success;
+ u64 data;
+
+ puf->e->pos += TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
+ puf->e->end = puf->e->start + TEST_U64_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u64);
+
+ success = unpack_u64(puf->e, &data, name);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
+ puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_code_match(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success = unpack_X(puf->e, AA_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, puf->e->pos == puf->e->start + 1);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_code_mismatch(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success = unpack_X(puf->e, AA_STRING);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, puf->e->pos == puf->e->start);
+}
+
+static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf = test->priv;
+ bool success;
+
+ puf->e->pos = puf->e->end;
+ success = unpack_X(puf->e, AA_NAME);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, success);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case apparmor_policy_unpack_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_inbounds_when_inbounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_inbounds_when_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_blob_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_wrong_code),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_nameX_with_wrong_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_str_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u32_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_with_null_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_with_name),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_u64_out_of_bounds),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_code_match),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_code_mismatch),
+ KUNIT_CASE(policy_unpack_test_unpack_X_out_of_bounds),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite apparmor_policy_unpack_test_module = {
+ .name = "apparmor_policy_unpack",
+ .init = policy_unpack_test_init,
+ .test_cases = apparmor_policy_unpack_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(apparmor_policy_unpack_test_module);
Hi Linus, Please pull the following Kselftest kunit update for Linux 5.6-rc1 This kunit update for Linux 5.6-rc1 consists of: -- Support for building kunit as a module from Alan Maguire -- AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack from Mike Salvatore diff is attached. thanks, -- Shuah ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following changes since commit c79f46a282390e0f5b306007bf7b11a46d529538: Linux 5.5-rc5 (2020-01-05 14:23:27 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest tags/linux-kselftest-5.6-rc1-kunit for you to fetch changes up to 35c57fc3f8eac81b38664a0fe160e267b908d8b8: kunit: building kunit as a module breaks allmodconfig (2020-01-10 14:36:37 -0700) ---------------------------------------------------------------- linux-kselftest-5.6-rc1-kunit This kunit update for Linux 5.6-rc1 consists of: -- Support for building kunit as a module from Alan Maguire -- AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack from Mike Salvatore ---------------------------------------------------------------- Alan Maguire (7): kunit: move string-stream.h to lib/kunit kunit: hide unexported try-catch interface in try-catch-impl.h kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module kunit: remove timeout dependence on sysctl_hung_task_timeout_seconds kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module kunit: update documentation to describe module-based build kunit: building kunit as a module breaks allmodconfig Mike Salvatore (1): apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 3 +- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 3 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 16 + drivers/base/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/base/power/qos-test.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 2 +- fs/ext4/Makefile | 3 +- fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 4 +- include/kunit/assert.h | 3 +- include/kunit/test.h | 37 +- include/kunit/try-catch.h | 10 - kernel/sysctl-test.c | 4 +- lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 +- lib/kunit/Kconfig | 6 +- lib/kunit/Makefile | 14 +- lib/kunit/assert.c | 10 + lib/kunit/{example-test.c => kunit-example-test.c} | 4 +- lib/kunit/{test-test.c => kunit-test.c} | 7 +- lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c | 5 +- lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 3 +- {include => lib}/kunit/string-stream.h | 0 lib/kunit/test.c | 25 +- lib/kunit/try-catch-impl.h | 27 + lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 37 +- lib/list-test.c | 4 +- security/apparmor/Kconfig | 16 + security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c | 4 + security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 607 +++++++++++++++++++++ 28 files changed, 788 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) rename lib/kunit/{example-test.c => kunit-example-test.c} (97%) rename lib/kunit/{test-test.c => kunit-test.c} (98%) rename {include => lib}/kunit/string-stream.h (100%) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/try-catch-impl.h create mode 100644 security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c ----------------------------------------------------------------