Message ID | 9c10d9f974f07fcb354a43a8eca67acb2fafc587.1715926605.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 6c8d7598dfed759bf1d9d0322b4c2b42eb7252d8 |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix prog numbers in test_sockmap | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>: On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:21:46 +0800 you wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > bpf_prog5 and bpf_prog7 are removed from progs/test_sockmap_kern.h in > commit d79a32129b21 ("bpf: Selftests, remove prints from sockmap tests"), > now there are only 9 progs in it, not 11: > > SEC("sk_skb1") > int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb) > SEC("sk_skb2") > int bpf_prog2(struct __sk_buff *skb) > SEC("sk_skb3") > int bpf_prog3(struct __sk_buff *skb) > SEC("sockops") > int bpf_sockmap(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops) > SEC("sk_msg1") > int bpf_prog4(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > SEC("sk_msg2") > int bpf_prog6(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > SEC("sk_msg3") > int bpf_prog8(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > SEC("sk_msg4") > int bpf_prog9(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > SEC("sk_msg5") > int bpf_prog10(struct sk_msg_md *msg) > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix prog numbers in test_sockmap https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6c8d7598dfed You are awesome, thank you!
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 06:20 PM GMT, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote: > Hello: > > This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) > by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>: > > On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:21:46 +0800 you wrote: >> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> >> >> bpf_prog5 and bpf_prog7 are removed from progs/test_sockmap_kern.h in >> commit d79a32129b21 ("bpf: Selftests, remove prints from sockmap tests"), >> now there are only 9 progs in it, not 11: >> >> SEC("sk_skb1") >> int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb) >> SEC("sk_skb2") >> int bpf_prog2(struct __sk_buff *skb) >> SEC("sk_skb3") >> int bpf_prog3(struct __sk_buff *skb) >> SEC("sockops") >> int bpf_sockmap(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops) >> SEC("sk_msg1") >> int bpf_prog4(struct sk_msg_md *msg) >> SEC("sk_msg2") >> int bpf_prog6(struct sk_msg_md *msg) >> SEC("sk_msg3") >> int bpf_prog8(struct sk_msg_md *msg) >> SEC("sk_msg4") >> int bpf_prog9(struct sk_msg_md *msg) >> SEC("sk_msg5") >> int bpf_prog10(struct sk_msg_md *msg) >> >> [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix prog numbers in test_sockmap > https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6c8d7598dfed > > You are awesome, thank you! We don't need prog_types and attach_types at all. I was too late too comment so here's a patch to address that: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240522080936.2475833-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c index 92752f5eeded..4499b3cfc3a6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int passed; int failed; int map_fd[9]; struct bpf_map *maps[9]; -int prog_fd[11]; +int prog_fd[9]; int txmsg_pass; int txmsg_redir; @@ -1793,8 +1793,6 @@ int prog_attach_type[] = { BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, - BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, - BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, }; int prog_type[] = { @@ -1807,8 +1805,6 @@ int prog_type[] = { BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, }; static int populate_progs(char *bpf_file)