mbox series

[0/3] ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes

Message ID 20191009175628.20570-1-bparrot@ti.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes | expand

Message

Benoit Parrot Oct. 9, 2019, 5:56 p.m. UTC
This patch series adds the needed clkctrl and ty-sysc nodes for VPE module.
We also document the VPE DT bindings.

Benoit Parrot (3):
  dt-bindings: media: ti-vpe: Document VPE driver
  ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe clkctrl node
  ARM: dts: dra7: Add ti-sysc node for VPE

 .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt      | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-l4.dtsi                | 30 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi          | 18 ++++++-
 drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c                      |  6 +++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/dra7.h              | 10 ++++
 6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt

Comments

Benoit Parrot Oct. 22, 2019, 4:27 p.m. UTC | #1
Tony,

Ping,

I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
sending a v2.

Regards,
Benoit

Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> wrote on Wed [2019-Oct-09 12:56:25 -0500]:
> This patch series adds the needed clkctrl and ty-sysc nodes for VPE module.
> We also document the VPE DT bindings.
> 
> Benoit Parrot (3):
>   dt-bindings: media: ti-vpe: Document VPE driver
>   ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe clkctrl node
>   ARM: dts: dra7: Add ti-sysc node for VPE
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt      | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-l4.dtsi                | 30 ++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi          | 18 ++++++-
>  drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c                      |  6 +++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/dra7.h              | 10 ++++
>  6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Tony Lindgren Oct. 22, 2019, 4:30 p.m. UTC | #2
* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:28]:
> Tony,
> 
> Ping,
> 
> I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
> sending a v2.

Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented
on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :)

Regards,

Tony
Benoit Parrot Oct. 22, 2019, 4:33 p.m. UTC | #3
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:30:48 -0700]:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:28]:
> > Tony,
> > 
> > Ping,
> > 
> > I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
> > sending a v2.
> 
> Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented
> on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :)

Would I need to split off the clk*.c/.h as well here though?

Benoit

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
Tony Lindgren Oct. 22, 2019, 4:37 p.m. UTC | #4
* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:34]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:30:48 -0700]:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:28]:
> > > Tony,
> > > 
> > > Ping,
> > > 
> > > I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
> > > sending a v2.
> > 
> > Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented
> > on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :)
> 
> Would I need to split off the clk*.c/.h as well here though?

Yeah please do patches with just drivers/clk/ti and
include/dt-bindings/clock changes in them. then Tero
can queue them into an immutable branch that I can merge
in too and use as a base for the dts changes.

Regards,

Tony
Benoit Parrot Oct. 22, 2019, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #5
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:37:54 -0700]:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:34]:
> > Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:30:48 -0700]:
> > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:28]:
> > > > Tony,
> > > > 
> > > > Ping,
> > > > 
> > > > I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
> > > > sending a v2.
> > > 
> > > Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented
> > > on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :)
> > 
> > Would I need to split off the clk*.c/.h as well here though?
> 
> Yeah please do patches with just drivers/clk/ti and
> include/dt-bindings/clock changes in them. then Tero
> can queue them into an immutable branch that I can merge
> in too and use as a base for the dts changes.

Although the .h is in include/dt-binding. Does it still belong in the same
patch as drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c then?

Just making sure....

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
Tony Lindgren Oct. 22, 2019, 4:46 p.m. UTC | #6
* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:45]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:37:54 -0700]:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:34]:
> > > Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 09:30:48 -0700]:
> > > > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> [191022 16:28]:
> > > > > Tony,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ping,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before
> > > > > sending a v2.
> > > > 
> > > > Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented
> > > > on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :)
> > > 
> > > Would I need to split off the clk*.c/.h as well here though?
> > 
> > Yeah please do patches with just drivers/clk/ti and
> > include/dt-bindings/clock changes in them. then Tero
> > can queue them into an immutable branch that I can merge
> > in too and use as a base for the dts changes.
> 
> Although the .h is in include/dt-binding. Does it still belong in the same
> patch as drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c then?
> 
> Just making sure....

Yes if it's needed to compile the drivers/clk/ti patch.
Otherwise it can stay with the dts changes.

Regards,

Tony