[RESEND,0/5] atomisp: Fixes and cleanups

Message

Alex Dewar Sept. 21, 2020, 9:53 p.m. UTC

Hi Mauro,

Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)

Best,
Alex

Comments

Mauro Carvalho Chehab Sept. 22, 2020, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #1

Em Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:53:49 +0100
Alex Dewar <[e-mail]> escreveu:

> Hi Mauro,
> 
> Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
> warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
> cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
> review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)

Usually, there's no need to re-send the patches, as we pick them
from a patchwork queue.

However, only one of the patches actually applied against the
linux-media tree.

So, please rebased the remaining patches on the top of it.

Thanks,
Mauro

Alex Dewar Sept. 22, 2020, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #2

On 22/09/2020 09:11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:53:49 +0100
> Alex Dewar <[e-mail]> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
>> warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
>> cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
>> review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)
> Usually, there's no need to re-send the patches, as we pick them
> from a patchwork queue.
>
> However, only one of the patches actually applied against the
> linux-media tree.
>
> So, please rebased the remaining patches on the top of it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
That's weird. They applied cleanly against yesterday's linux-next for 
me... I'll rebase on linux-media and resend.

Best,
Alex