@@ -517,7 +517,14 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
/* No device driver attached */
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * Don't mess with the host during probe: wait until the loop in
+ * scan_add_host() completes
+ */
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&list_lock))
+ return -ERESTARTSYS;
ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
+ mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&icd->video_lock))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
@@ -548,7 +555,6 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
if (icl->reset)
icl->reset(icd->pdev);
- /* Don't mess with the host during probe */
mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
@@ -602,7 +608,9 @@ esfmt:
eresume:
__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
epower:
+ mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ici->ops->remove(icd);
+ mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
eiciadd:
icd->use_count--;
module_put(ici->ops->owner);
@@ -625,7 +633,9 @@ static int soc_camera_close(struct file *file)
if (ici->ops->init_videobuf2)
vb2_queue_release(&icd->vb2_vidq);
+ mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ici->ops->remove(icd);
+ mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
}
@@ -1050,7 +1060,7 @@ static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
{
struct soc_camera_device *icd;
- mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(icd, &devices, list) {
if (icd->iface == ici->nr) {
@@ -1059,7 +1069,7 @@ static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO
@@ -1146,7 +1156,9 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
if (icl->reset)
icl->reset(icd->pdev);
+ mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
+ mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
if (ret < 0)
goto eadd;
@@ -1218,7 +1230,9 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
icd->field = mf.field;
}
+ mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ici->ops->remove(icd);
+ mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
mutex_unlock(&icd->video_lock);
@@ -1240,7 +1254,9 @@ eadddev:
video_device_release(icd->vdev);
icd->vdev = NULL;
evdc:
+ mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
ici->ops->remove(icd);
+ mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
eadd:
ereg:
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&icd->ctrl_handler);
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct soc_camera_device {
struct soc_camera_host {
struct v4l2_device v4l2_dev;
struct list_head list;
- struct mutex host_lock; /* Protect during probing */
+ struct mutex host_lock; /* Protect pipeline modifications */
unsigned char nr; /* Host number */
u32 capabilities;
void *priv;
The recently introduced host_lock causes lockdep warnings, besides, list enumeration in scan_add_host() must be protected by holdint the list_lock. OTOH, holding .video_lock in soc_camera_open() isn't enough to protect the host during its building of the pipeline, because .video_lock is per soc-camera device. If, e.g. more than one sensor can be attached to a host and the user tries to open both device nodes simultaneously, host's .add() method can be called simultaneously for both sensors. Fix these problems by holding list_lock instead of .host_lock in scan_add_host() and taking it shortly at the beginning of soc_camera_open(), and using .host_lock to protect host's .add() and .remove() operations only. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> --- drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- include/media/soc_camera.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)