diff mbox

[RFCv2,2/2] dma-buf: add helpers for sharing attacher constraints with dma-parms

Message ID 1421813807-9178-3-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sumit Semwal Jan. 21, 2015, 4:16 a.m. UTC
Add some helpers to share the constraints of devices while attaching
to the dmabuf buffer.

At each attach, the constraints are calculated based on the following:
- dma_mask, coherent_dma_mask from struct device,
- max_segment_size, max_segment_count, segment_boundary_mask from
   device_dma_parameters.

In case the attaching device's constraints don't match up, attach() fails.

At detach, the constraints are recalculated based on the remaining
attached devices.

Two helpers are added:
- dma_buf_get_constraints - which gives the current constraints as calculated
      during each attach on the buffer till the time,
- dma_buf_recalc_constraints - which recalculates the constraints for all
      currently attached devices for the 'paranoid' ones amongst us.

The idea of this patch is largely taken from Rob Clark's RFC at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/19/285, and the comments received on it.

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  22 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Russell King - ARM Linux Jan. 21, 2015, 5:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:46:47AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> +static int calc_constraints(struct device *dev,
> +			    struct dma_buf_constraints *calc_cons)
> +{
> +	struct dma_buf_constraints cons = *calc_cons;
> +
> +	cons.dma_mask &= dma_get_mask(dev);

I don't think this makes much sense when you consider that the DMA
infrastructure supports buses with offsets.  The DMA mask is th
upper limit of the _bus_ specific address, it is not a mask per-se.

What this means is that &= is not the right operation.  Moreover,
simply comparing masks which could be from devices on unrelated
buses doesn't make sense either.

However, that said, I don't have an answer for what you want to
achieve here.
Sumit Semwal Jan. 27, 2015, 7:04 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Russell!

On 21 January 2015 at 23:01, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:46:47AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
>> +static int calc_constraints(struct device *dev,
>> +                         struct dma_buf_constraints *calc_cons)
>> +{
>> +     struct dma_buf_constraints cons = *calc_cons;
>> +
>> +     cons.dma_mask &= dma_get_mask(dev);
>
> I don't think this makes much sense when you consider that the DMA
> infrastructure supports buses with offsets.  The DMA mask is th
> upper limit of the _bus_ specific address, it is not a mask per-se.
>
> What this means is that &= is not the right operation.  Moreover,
> simply comparing masks which could be from devices on unrelated
> buses doesn't make sense either.
>
> However, that said, I don't have an answer for what you want to
> achieve here.

Thanks for your comments! I suppose in that case, I will leave out the
*dma_masks from this constraints information for now; we can re-visit
it when a specific use case really needs information about the
dma-masks of the attached devices.

I will post an updated patch-set soon.
>
> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 5be225c..3781f43 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -264,6 +264,77 @@  static inline int is_dma_buf_file(struct file *file)
 	return file->f_op == &dma_buf_fops;
 }
 
+static inline void init_constraints(struct dma_buf_constraints *cons)
+{
+	cons->coherent_dma_mask = (u64)-1;
+	cons->dma_mask = (u64)-1;
+	cons->dma_parms.max_segment_count = (unsigned int)-1;
+	cons->dma_parms.max_segment_size = (unsigned int)-1;
+	cons->dma_parms.segment_boundary_mask = (unsigned int)-1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * calc_constraints - calculates if the new attaching device's constraints
+ * match, with the constraints of already attached devices; if yes, returns
+ * the constraints; else return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
+ */
+static int calc_constraints(struct device *dev,
+			    struct dma_buf_constraints *calc_cons)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_constraints cons = *calc_cons;
+
+	cons.dma_mask &= dma_get_mask(dev);
+	/* TODO: Check if this is the right way for coherent_mask ? */
+	cons.coherent_dma_mask &= dev->coherent_dma_mask;
+
+	cons.dma_parms.max_segment_count =
+			min(cons.dma_parms.max_segment_count,
+			    dma_get_max_seg_count(dev));
+	cons.dma_parms.max_segment_size =
+			min(cons.dma_parms.max_segment_size,
+			    dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));
+	cons.dma_parms.segment_boundary_mask &=
+			dma_get_seg_boundary(dev);
+
+	if (!cons.dma_parms.max_segment_count ||
+	    !cons.dma_parms.max_segment_size ||
+	    !cons.dma_parms.segment_boundary_mask ||
+	    !cons.dma_mask ||
+	    !cons.coherent_dma_mask) {
+		pr_err("Dev: %s's constraints don't match\n", dev_name(dev));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	*calc_cons = cons;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * recalc_constraints - recalculates constraints for all attached devices;
+ *  useful for detach() recalculation, and for dma_buf_recalc_constraints()
+ *  helper.
+ *  Returns recalculated constraints in recalc_cons, or error in the unlikely
+ *  case when constraints of attached devices might have changed.
+ */
+static int recalc_constraints(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+			      struct dma_buf_constraints *recalc_cons)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_constraints calc_cons;
+	struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	init_constraints(&calc_cons);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node) {
+		ret = calc_constraints(attach->dev, &calc_cons);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	*recalc_cons = calc_cons;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * dma_buf_export_named - Creates a new dma_buf, and associates an anon file
  * with this buffer, so it can be exported.
@@ -313,6 +384,9 @@  struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export_named(void *priv, const struct dma_buf_ops *ops,
 	dmabuf->ops = ops;
 	dmabuf->size = size;
 	dmabuf->exp_name = exp_name;
+
+	init_constraints(&dmabuf->constraints);
+
 	init_waitqueue_head(&dmabuf->poll);
 	dmabuf->cb_excl.poll = dmabuf->cb_shared.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
 	dmabuf->cb_excl.active = dmabuf->cb_shared.active = 0;
@@ -422,7 +496,7 @@  struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
 					  struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -436,6 +510,9 @@  struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
 
 	mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
 
+	if (calc_constraints(dev, &dmabuf->constraints))
+		goto err_constraints;
+
 	if (dmabuf->ops->attach) {
 		ret = dmabuf->ops->attach(dmabuf, dev, attach);
 		if (ret)
@@ -448,6 +525,7 @@  struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
 
 err_attach:
 	kfree(attach);
+err_constraints:
 	mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
@@ -470,6 +548,8 @@  void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 	if (dmabuf->ops->detach)
 		dmabuf->ops->detach(dmabuf, attach);
 
+	recalc_constraints(dmabuf, &dmabuf->constraints);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
 	kfree(attach);
 }
@@ -770,6 +850,56 @@  void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void *vaddr)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_vunmap);
 
+/**
+ * dma_buf_get_constraints - get the *current* constraints of the dmabuf,
+ *  as calculated during each attach(); returns error on invalid inputs
+ *
+ * @dmabuf:		[in]	buffer to get constraints of
+ * @constraints:	[out]	current constraints are returned in this
+ */
+int dma_buf_get_constraints(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+			    struct dma_buf_constraints *constraints)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !constraints))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
+	*constraints = dmabuf->constraints;
+	mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_get_constraints);
+
+/**
+ * dma_buf_recalc_constraints - *recalculate* the constraints for the buffer
+ *  afresh, from the list of currently attached devices; this could be useful
+ *  cross-check the current constraints, for exporters that might want to be
+ *  'paranoid' about the device constraints.
+ *
+ *  returns error on invalid inputs
+ *
+ * @dmabuf:		[in]	buffer to get constraints of
+ * @constraints:	[out]	recalculated constraints are returned in this
+ */
+int dma_buf_recalc_constraints(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+			    struct dma_buf_constraints *constraints)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_constraints calc_cons;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !constraints))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
+	ret = recalc_constraints(dmabuf, &calc_cons);
+	if (!ret)
+		*constraints = calc_cons;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_recalc_constraints);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static int dma_buf_describe(struct seq_file *s)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index 694e1fe..e1f7cbe 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -34,10 +34,28 @@ 
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 
 struct device;
+struct device_dma_parameters;
 struct dma_buf;
 struct dma_buf_attachment;
 
 /**
+ * struct dma_buf_constraints - holds constraints for the dma-buf
+ * @dma_mask:	dma_mask if the device is dma'able
+ * @coherent_dma_mask: like dma_mask, but for alloc_coherent mappings
+ * @dma_parms: collated dma_parms from all devices.
+ *
+ * This structure holds the constraints of the dma_buf, dependent on the
+ * currently attached devices. Semantics for each of the members are the same
+ * as defined in device.h
+ */
+struct dma_buf_constraints {
+	u64		dma_mask;
+	u64		coherent_dma_mask;
+	struct device_dma_parameters dma_parms;
+};
+
+
+/**
  * struct dma_buf_ops - operations possible on struct dma_buf
  * @attach: [optional] allows different devices to 'attach' themselves to the
  *	    given buffer. It might return -EBUSY to signal that backing storage
@@ -130,6 +148,7 @@  struct dma_buf {
 	void *vmap_ptr;
 	const char *exp_name;
 	struct list_head list_node;
+	struct dma_buf_constraints constraints;
 	void *priv;
 	struct reservation_object *resv;
 
@@ -211,4 +230,7 @@  void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *);
 void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *, void *vaddr);
 int dma_buf_debugfs_create_file(const char *name,
 				int (*write)(struct seq_file *));
+
+int dma_buf_get_constraints(struct dma_buf *, struct dma_buf_constraints *);
+int dma_buf_recalc_constraints(struct dma_buf *, struct dma_buf_constraints *);
 #endif /* __DMA_BUF_H__ */