| Message ID | 1567687896-19996-3-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | replace code with FIELD_SIZEOF | expand |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:51:35PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > It's more clear to use FIELD_SIZEOF instead of its implementation. > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c index 51b9127..eebea91 100644 --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c @@ -2637,7 +2637,7 @@ struct v4l2_ioctl_info { /* Zero struct from after the field to the end */ #define INFO_FL_CLEAR(v4l2_struct, field) \ ((offsetof(struct v4l2_struct, field) + \ - sizeof(((struct v4l2_struct *)0)->field)) << 16) + FIELD_SIZEOF(struct v4l2_struct, field)) << 16) #define INFO_FL_CLEAR_MASK (_IOC_SIZEMASK << 16) #define DEFINE_V4L_STUB_FUNC(_vidioc) \
It's more clear to use FIELD_SIZEOF instead of its implementation. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> --- drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)